I so don't get how posts are ranked. Is it based on the amount of comments? Partially. But some posts are ranked best without many or any comments. Some of my posts that I think are dead interesting are only given a one. Some of them that are pretty bland or unoriginal get high rankings.
- Comments are way too low, and dont show on many posts
- It says 20 posts since June 20. That is incorrect as we publish around 5 each day!
- post rank seems incorrect, comparing my blog to other similar traffic ones.
The Top Post widget I added to my blog has been static (no updates at all). At first, I was confused about why. Now it appears that the problem is due to aideRSS not counting Haloscan comments in the PostRank. It would be great to have a solution for those of us using Haloscan for comments.
Although others report shwoing too much comments for their posts, my weblog (http://www.minitrue.nl) however does contain comments, but they are not shown on the AideRSS-page.
(Can it have something to do with using another language than English?)
Hi, PostRank for my blog www.minimarketing.it feed http://feeds.feedburner.com/minimarke... (with haloscan comments) has strange behaviour: for some posts (not all) the number of comments on haloscan is "0", even though comments are more than 10. SInce number of comments is heavy influencing PR I think you should give a look into the issue - not just for my blog, obviously :)
What services or sites does aiderss all check for tabulating blog comments? Aiderss shows comments for some of my blog postings that are not on my blog. Where are they?
My supposed top two blog posts have completely inaccurate data as to the number of comments they received - way in excess of what was submitted to me for moderation. I suspect you may be counting attempted spam comments
Are you all ever going to be able to get the comment thing correct? Since i first reported to you that your system was not picking up any of our comments, we have had more than 70,000 comments on our site. Aiderss has not reported even one of them. I received a first reply saying you were workign on it and then ever so often i have dropped you further mail on the topic and have not had a response to the 4-5 other notes i have passed you . I'm game to do whatever we need to do to get picked up and it is import6ant to us now that somehow you have convinced any number of sites that your technology is acculrate and they are determining other thigns based on it. i have to say i'm not convinced. thats a lot of comments to miss. Is there anything y ou can do about it?
I was truly a huge fan of what you were doing. ...a year ago. But the lack of interest in accuracy is telling.i will cheer for your success like all the rest but this is a major problem and i have a hard time believing it is limited.
I just joined AIDeRSS and I checked my blog feed ratings but it seems that I am seeing extra comments on some posts. For example in the "Help Drigg" post, it reports 48 comments but there's only 4.
I found some topics here where you say that the problem was fixed but it seems to be affecting me :-/
When checking my feed I notice that AideRSS claims comments that aren't their. And what's with those "comment" links, when I click on them they keep saying their is an error due to a bad link. Might that be feedburner related?
The Kotaku blog feed doesn't seem to be catching comments for posts... a cursory inspection of Kotaku's code indicates it ought to be possible to count the comments (they nest them in a <ul>)
Loading Profile...
Melanie Baker (Official Rep)
last replied
on September 17, 2008 15:11
Andrew Baldwin (Employee)
last replied
on September 07, 2008 21:33
Ilya Grigorik (Official Rep)
last replied
on August 31, 2008 13:24
db0
last replied
on August 22, 2008 16:55
