Xmarks: Where's Opera support?
So Foxmarks has become Xmarks and intends to be cross-platform. Great! Except the announcement doesn't seem to mention Google Chrome or Opera. Any updates on either browser?
122
people have this question
I have this question, too!
Tell me when someone answers.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
The best answer from the company
-
Chrome is covered here: http://getsatisfaction.com/foxmarks/t...
Opera is mentioned in a couple topics, but seems to be mainly discussed here: http://getsatisfaction.com/foxmarks/t...
The company says
this answers the question
-
Inappropriate?Chrome is covered here: http://getsatisfaction.com/foxmarks/t...
Opera is mentioned in a couple topics, but seems to be mainly discussed here: http://getsatisfaction.com/foxmarks/t...
The company says
this answers the question
-
I understand, and appreciate the links. I actually came across those earlier, searching to make sure that I didn't miss anything before asking.
I was just hoping there was an update on the status of Chrome (or, in the case of Opera, a reconsideration), given the Xmarks announcement. So... is Chrome still in the cards? Thanks. :) -
Inappropriate?No update yet on Chrome; we're waiting until Google provides an extensions framework. We'll definitely post in our blog at http://blog.xmarks.com/ once there's an update!
-
As would I. -
Inappropriate?Chrome... not tried Opera (yet)
-
Inappropriate?Opera is a decent browser but it has the smallest market share of all the well-known browsers. This means it will be below IE, Safari and Chrome on the list. Bearing in mind that Xmarks will probably have to make changes when newer versions of their currently supported browsers come out I'm guessing it will be a while before they Provide Opera support. If at all... What's next? Konqueror?
I’m amused
-
Opera is one of the best most innovative browsers, Opera invented history, tabbing, and even pop up blockers, I think that they deserve Xmarks!!!! -
Props to Opera for inventing all that but unfortunately Xmarks is a business. If they were doing things based on how GOOD a browser was rather than how POPULAR then they wouldn't have picked IE as their second browser to support now, would they? Another factor is how easy it is to write plugins - which is why Firefox was their first browser, but I can't really comment on that as I don't know much about Opera's plugin support. -
Well... I think the problem is that tweaking XMarks to work with Opera isn't even on the "to do someday" list. If it were, people would probably undertand waiting in queue for it. But I wonder - since XMarks is Web-based, couldn't Opera write its own interface? I'd use Opera much more often for some specific things if I could coordinate bookmarks between browsers using 'XMarks. -
Konqueror is hardly comparable to Opera seeing as how the former has a market share of 0.05% while the latter boasts a market share of 2.04%. Chrome itself currently has a market share of 2.84% so if Chrome, why not Opera? -
The Konqueror comment was not exactly serious but you could say that in terms of market penetration Konqueror is to Opera what Opera is to Firefox/IE (depending on which statistics you read).
Your comparison to Chrome misses one important thing:
Chrome launched a year ago and has 2.84% of the market.
Opera launched to public 13 years ago and yet has 0.8% less.
I'm not knocking Opera. It's been a while since I've used it but I remember it being a decent browser (I particularly liked the pane view - I have a firefox plugin that does similar but isn't quite as good - and they had zoom way before anyone else) I'm just saying that these things go on popularity and market forces. Chrome has Google's name behind it and an average growth rate of about 2.84% a year so far. Opera doesn't have Google's name behind it and has an average growth rate of roughly 0.15% per year so far.
I personally don't share the pessimism of some other posters who think that Opera isn't even on Xmarks' list. I think it's there. It's just below Safari for Windows and Chrome and any updates needed when version changes are made in Firefox, IE, Safari and (possibly) Chrome. -
You raise some valid points. Nevertheless, the fact that Opera has been around for such a long time indicates staying power. In addition to that, as more and more people gain access to the internet, the userbase for each browser will increase, thus increasing the potential userbase for Xmarks. Even if the market share for each browser remains the same, the market itself will grow, meaning that more people will be using Opera. These people need to be catered to, preferably sooner than later. -
Re: Timothy's statement - I am sick of this so-called "profit" rationale that is supposed to work magically to explain everything, as if actually being concerned about and addressing an issue because of its meaning and importance is not even worthy of consideration. Would it be right for every business in the world to only care about short-term profit at the expense of why something is done? If the healthcare industry did that we'd have people dying... oh, wait! We do have people dying because they don't fit into corporate "profit" models!
Just because something is or isn't for profit doesn't mean it is better or worse, or should be done or should not be done. Things should be done because people need and want them. This forum is testament to a need/want to have Opera support. To hell with profit if it means disregarding people's needs. I would also guess that one Opera user is probably more valuable than 100 or even 1000 IE using drones whose level of knowledge of computing barely extends beyond drooling. Should every business cater to this simply because it represents "profit"? -
Althea, I hope more businesses jump on this idea soon. Need should be the only determinant, and these developers should be required to work for the good of others, rather than nastily considering themselves anywhere in the equation.
It certainly worked out flawlessly in Atlas Shrugged. -
Um... I can't find anyplace in Althaea's comment that says develoers should be required to work for the good of others. And bringing "Atlas Shrugged" into this like some sort of Biblical authority is just... bent, is the nicest word I can come up with. What Althaea said was that profit motive isn't the ONLY reason to do something, and commercial companies should respond to the needs of the community, not just to the bottom line. That makes sense to me. Citing "Atlas Shrugged" to disprove it makes no sense at all, and misquoting what Althaea said just seems... geez, did you READ the comment? I'll even add that doing things for the good of the community gains some of the best "buzz" a company can get. If you think the community's approval or disapproval is irrelevant to profits, ask Wal-Mart what happened when their anti-community policies started to drive off the people who bought big-ticket items. Serving one's customer community brings its own rewards, including not losing your best customers. -
Hey Craig,
Juan's comment was a sarcastic response to Althaea's silly rant. You look like a tool.
:)
(For the record, I do wish Xmarks had Opera support, but there's no urgent reason or market share for it. I'd probably even pay a small one-time fee to enable Opera support if that would provide financial encouragement for them to build it.) -
@Timothy - one of the biggest points you seem to be missing in your browser-market-share argument is that whilst Opera is marginally smaller than Chrome on the desktop, it's market share on the mobile is on par with Firefox on the desktop, and there is so much of a movement towards the mobile at the moment.
And you can't validly say that Chrome has had "an average growth rate of about 2.84% a year so far" when that's a startup. Practically all Google programs get a significant market share when they start up, but they don't all go somewhere with it. And secondly, most programs/services which have a good startup will acheive something similar in their first year... it doesn't really say anything significant. Chrome could easily soon plateau to 0.1% per year - who knows where it will go... -
Inappropriate?Uhh yeh...Google Xmarks needs to be done, fast. I use Chrome all the time (mainly for the omni bar and the speed in which it starts up). Maybe you can approach Google =). A bit far fetched, but IMHO you might be popular enough for them to consider.
I’m dying from a lack of bookmark sync in Chrome.
-
Inappropriate?Opera would be nice only in that bookmarks I make on Opera Mini on my phone are synchronized with Opera. Then I could sync my FF, IE on my desktop, and also Opera Mini on my phone.
And yes, I'd like Chrome too. Come on Google, get us add-ons. -
Inappropriate?Opera mini is the default browser on Sprint HTC Touch Diamond currently shipping, and I would assume it's also the default broswer on every HTC phone they sell.
-
Inappropriate?My mistake, it's opera mobile.
-
Inappropriate?People, Opera has had it's on bookmark syncing service built in for a while now.
-
"MKnight", please see the comment by "JoSch" below. That is the very crux of my whining, carping, and complaining here..... What I yearn for is a clean, seemless [to the end-user] bookmarks synching facility that will operate in the background. Opera has it's own syching service, but that service ONLY sychs what you have in your Opera install at that given moment. It pays no attention to any changes made in Firefox or IE [for those pitiful souls who still use it]. "We have the technology" [see .json backup of bookmarks in both FF and Opera -- I really don't follow IE], so let's make a uniform, portable solution where your bookmarks can "follow you anywhere" -- even to web-enabled phones and other devices. -
Just out of interest. I get round this on my iPhone by syncing my Firefox bookmarks with IE (which I otherwise pretty much don't use) then launching IE to sync just before I sync my mobile (an iPhone) which syncs with IE. I would say it's a safe bet that most mobiles would sync their bookmarks with IE when they sync with the computer (of course I might be wrong in this).
If this is the case you wouldn't have up-to-the-minute syncing but it'd be pretty regular. -
Inappropriate?More info here: http://www.opera.com/discover/browser...
-
Inappropriate?Well yes...
But the point would be to sync opera with Firefox and/or IE! -
Precisely. Opera is my primary web browser but I also use Firefox and Chrome on a regular basis. -
Inappropriate?Frustrated by the hideous Flash/shockwave plugin freezing my Firefox all the time, I had to install Chrome on my Work PC, well, I'm still using FireFox 64bit on my laptop, which is pretty smooth, so now I needed to sync between these two... and it sucks...
I really appreciate Google's appreciation for minimal design, which is pretty much supporting top performance, but they should consider practicallity as well, they should start supporting at least a very basic extension/addon system... heopefully very soon :(
I’m very sad I can't get my bookmarks with Chrome the way I want :(
-
Inappropriate?Opera has it's own bookmark syncronization solution.
Not as reliable as xmarks, but works pretty well.
Just don't want to modify bookmarks in different places at the same time. :) -
Inappropriate?Ohh... that one got out of my mind... I use xmarks for that too :)
I can understand that point. -
Inappropriate?I'll second (and third - and fourth) that comment!!
Now, let's hope someone on the Chrome "Team" and/or the Xmarks "Team" is paying attention.
I’m equally (possibly more) frustrated.
-
Inappropriate?http://www.blogsdna.com/3943/get-goog... describes a Chrome extension that supports syncing Chrome bookmarks with the Google Bookmarks service. It requires Google Chrome 3.0.192.x or later which you can get if you use the Dev channel. That means its not useful for most users yet, but implies the extensions framework is available that Xmarks needs.
-
Inappropriate?To say that the development rate at xmarks is glacial would be understating it.
I’m frustrated
-
Inappropriate?I was going to merge this topic into the original (and more popular) topic here:
http://www.getsatisfaction.com/foxmar...
...but then that's not really fair to those of you asking for Opera support, so I've simply updated the title to reflect that this thread is now about Opera. If you're interested in tracking updates regarding our Chrome efforts, feel free to check out the other topic, and thanks for your enthusiasm!
I’m glee-filled
-
Inappropriate?The reason I'm using Chrome is because Facebook loads faster than on Firefox and IE8, but it doesn't sync with either of them and doesn't have a lot of the bells and whistles I used on the other browsers. I realize that this was intentional because they were going for speed with functionality, but those add-ons are pretty darned useful and I miss them.
I’m bummed
-
Have you tried Firefox 3.5.1 at all? I've heard Tracemonkey makes it load those sites pretty quickly. -
Inappropriate?I'm not sure which version of Firefox we're running...I'll have to check and try out Tracemonkey! Thank you, Eric!
I’m thankful
-
Inappropriate?I'm sure looking forward to the support of both Chrome, and Opera. Doing web development, it's exceedingly handy to have all / proper bookmarks available in any given client I'm testing / developing for.
At the same time, I sure understand that Xmarks is working on it. Cross platform support for syncing to your own server (like the Firefox version has) would just be a bonus for IE, Safari, etc.
Thanks for the work.
I’m unconcerned
-
Inappropriate?With the release of Opera 10 which so far appears to be fantastic I certainly hope there is a way to get XMarks support in Opera. It's the only thing stopping me from switching to Opera as my primary browser (still have to use IE in some instances).
-
Inappropriate?Opera should be granted an xmarks plug-in as a reward for complying with the w3c standards. Come on xmarks, you've done some web development, help them help you. http://acid3.acidtests.org/.
I’m bummed that opera would be left out.
-
Great comment, that. Standards compliance helps everyone - I hope xmarks will change its mind about giving Opera the support they need. -
Inappropriate?Google seems to hate my Win 7 machine whether I use Firefox or IE so I've decided to go back to Opera. I was a huge fan of Opera before I started down the Firefox path. I would really like to be able to use X-Marks on Opera!
I’m disappointed
-
Inappropriate?Have to run Opera as it is the only browser that doesn't freeze my work Mac [OSX10.3.9] - but can't sync with my other FF browsers that have been running Fox- then X-marks for ages (at home). Also - developers, please bear in mind not all of us have machines that have OS's that can run the most recent versions of browsers like FF3 or Opera10 - so pleading for some help here too.
I’m sad
-
Inappropriate?I certainly agree that Opera should receive Xmarks support. Since Opera and Chrome don't differ that much in terms of market share, why one and not the other?
-
Inappropriate?Hi, I just installed Opera and will continue to use it if I can sync all my stuff as it is essential not to have to login to all my websites again, that and the bookmarks manager is neat
Always installed opera and quit using it after 3 minutes... but now I can use it if just the xmarks functionality or similar cross-firefox compatibility exists.
Thank you for everything guys!
I’m thankful
-
Inappropriate?Another hand in the air for Opera support here, both OS X and Windows. And while we're at it the Windows version of Safari, and the OS X version of Chrome if/when Google ever let us have a Mac version.
-
Inappropriate?I also used Opera for a long time before switching to Firefox. The new Opera is quite impressive and I'd like to switch back. But it is SUCH a hassle to wipe out all Opera's bookmarks and reimport Firefox's every time I switch back and forth.
Please please please do support Opera, or an open standard for bookmark synching, or something.
I’m very frustrated by both Opera and Xmarks
-
Inappropriate?The chrome Xmarks plugin is alive and kicking and works well for me so far.
Check the blog post about it and the signup page.
I’m happy
-
Inappropriate?Google's Chrome = Datamining = BAD.
Opera = no data mining, slim, speedy and, thus far, crash-resistant. I REALLY don't want to have to write a java app to sync my Xmarks with all my other bookmarks. Seems crazy. I understand why you guys would be hesitant to lose all that market share to Opera but... LOL.
I’m Still Frustrated
-
Inappropriate?Opera is still the best browser for power users, and power users are one part of the community which has a lot more weight than other parts. Microsoft lost because it alienated not the masses (well, it might have done that too) but because it alienated the aficionados, the people actually liked using computers and weren't just drooling drones. When you lose the community who actually enjoy and love the technology they are working with, you might as well consider the game itself lost. So Microsoft still has dominant market share - they have surely lost the heart and mind of every thinking, aware computer user in the world through atrocious actions and heinous policies which were insults to lovers of technology.
The argument that IE should get priority is therefore warped in my opinion, since it only adds momentum to the avalanche instead of finding a new path.
1 person says
this answers the question
-
Inappropriate?maybe i am a drone but i find the plugin-system of opera a pain in the a.s.s. and until i have decent built-in or plugin flash/ad/flashcookie etc-blockers i'll be droning with the fox.
-
Inappropriate?Current "Contra"'s against Xmarks:
The main reason I'm staying out of the Xmarks - I extensively use the most major browsers - Opera, Firefox, IE and relatively rarely - Safari from many work and home locations. Currently looking to test Google Android. That's related to my job tasks and couldn't be changed to, f.e., using only one or two browsers.
And, at all, I need the reliable tool capable to keep all that browser instances bookmarks and, optionally, home pages synchronised.
With Xmarks mission is not accomplished due to lacking support of Opera.
That's why I'm staying out from Xmarks, because it's simpler for me to stay with Opera bookmark syncronisation and organisation capabilities, supported by relatively big software company - Opera Software, and not to migrate to other solutions.
I'd be happy to that "Contra"'s to disappear at last.
I’m frustrated with Xmarks.
-
Inappropriate?Opera - Rocks....needs Xmarks.
FF sings and has Xmarks.
IE just came with the computer. I use it like the one above just to sync my bookmarks with my mobile. But, then again, I'm a Linux user that keeps Windows just for the mobile and occasional VPN at home.
I’m itchy
-
Inappropriate?Personally, I'd say the list of future extensions should be:
*Chrome (btw the current alpha is beastly)
*Opera (if possible)
*Safari for Windows
*Others -
Inappropriate?Developing a plugin/extension/widget for Opera shouldn't be too difficult. There appears to be a relatively large number of widgets and developers, despite the much smaller user-base. This suggests that there must be a pretty decent API, based on the large number of widgets available.
I’m waiting
-
Inappropriate?Widgets are primarily intended to be separate apps that run on Opera software, not extensions. That's not to say it can't be done, however. For example, there are different kinds of ways to extend Opera, such as Custom Buttons, Custom Searches, Custom Commands, and Power Buttons.
Someone also made a synchronizer for Opera on Linux using Python, so it is probably possible to write a program instead of an extension. Then a button can be used in Opera to call the program's functions.
Just a few ideas.
I’m disappointed there isn't extension support in Opera
Loading Profile...




EMPLOYEE









