Loading Profile...
Logging time is not very useful if you cannot see time cost reports
It's great that users can log their time spent on issues, but this is effectively useless if we cannot then view reports of the amount of time spent on issues.
Ideally you would be able to see a report of time spent on a per-project basis, and also on a per-user basis both across projects and within projects.
For more awesomeness, you'd also be able to filter these reports by other relevant fields, such as version and area if necessary, and also be able to specify date ranges.
Ideally you would be able to see a report of time spent on a per-project basis, and also on a per-user basis both across projects and within projects.
For more awesomeness, you'd also be able to filter these reports by other relevant fields, such as version and area if necessary, and also be able to specify date ranges.
I’m considering going up the 24-hour ASDA for a cornetto
1 person has this problem
I have this problem, too!
Tell me when someone solves it.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The company is working on this problem.
The best solution from the company
-
I definitely agree that there is a distinct lack of time-based reports in version 1. The basic time-logging feature went in to allow data collection and basic usage, while we worked on more of the advanced time reports in the next version.
And there will be awesomeness, as you guessed, as you will be able to filter time reports by key-related fields, albeit in a different filtering interface than issues.
The company says
this solves the problem
-
Inappropriate?I definitely agree that there is a distinct lack of time-based reports in version 1. The basic time-logging feature went in to allow data collection and basic usage, while we worked on more of the advanced time reports in the next version.
And there will be awesomeness, as you guessed, as you will be able to filter time reports by key-related fields, albeit in a different filtering interface than issues.
The company says
this solves the problem
EMPLOYEE