Proposed new procedure for dealing with gaming
To date we have dealt with gaming on a case by case basis. However it has become clear that we need to have a defined process for dealing with individuals that game. Therefore this is our proposed procedure:
First identified instance/set of instances: Email warning
Second identified instance/set of instances: Email warning, user placed on public watch list (for 2 weeks) and fined 50% of worth
Third instance/set of instances: Email warning, user placed on public watch list (for 2 weeks) and fined down to H$1,000
Any subsequent instance will result in their ability to create questions removed and potentially suspension of their account.
We propose to apply this procedure for all new instances of gaming however some users are on their first warning and one user is on their second warning.
First identified instance/set of instances: Email warning
Second identified instance/set of instances: Email warning, user placed on public watch list (for 2 weeks) and fined 50% of worth
Third instance/set of instances: Email warning, user placed on public watch list (for 2 weeks) and fined down to H$1,000
Any subsequent instance will result in their ability to create questions removed and potentially suspension of their account.
We propose to apply this procedure for all new instances of gaming however some users are on their first warning and one user is on their second warning.
Follow this discussion to get notifications on your dashboard.
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
Due to volume, only the 15 most recent replies are being displayed
-
Inappropriate?Oh really.
You are so wrong!
HD thing ...
I have yet to let go of any of my OBAMA's Out by 4/30 positions. Why do you think my net worth is dropping so fast. I'm on strike and not propping up that market. So, what drugs are you on ?
Why don't you speak truth?
You still haven't answered a very simple question that I posted awhile ago. If I DO have any funds that were because of a bug, then I will simply start over with a new username, and have jersjusttrolling blocked or deleted or whatever.
But I need proof! I need proof!
Why don't you answer my simple question?
" What bug are you referring to, and how did I use it? " -
Inappropriate?Read these:
http://www.hubdub.com/e/Market/When_w...
[comments 17,32]
http://www.hubdub.com/e/Market/how_ma...
[comment 6]
That's the bug I'm talkin about. I would have given you proof of that by a statement from Hubdub on getsatisfaction, but unfortunately my profile on it doesn't show the bug posts that far back. -
Inappropriate?Thank you for last post.
I've reviewed the comments.
I DO remember experiencing something akin to pics4d's where there were markets that had been active for a time, and then, all of a sudden their percentages seemed like someone must have dumped a busload of $H into them. So, I wagered on those markets. I thought, at that time that I happened to get in at a good price. Now I see that while I thought I had gotten in at a very opportune time, I just happened to run into a bug. hmmm.
Well, what to do now?
First of all, I owe a bagful of apologies to Rohan.
I also owe Rohan a truckload of thanks for digging this up.
What I abhore and deny is the 'cheating label'.
So,
jersjusttrolling is entering full and complete retirement.
I'll let the admins know that I won't be playing or commenting or anything with that account any longer. I'll make appropriate comments within my profile. I will be turning off all email alerts for that account as well.
And then, I start up with another username. Yes, I'm admitting now so no one accuses me of operating under multiple ids.
I'll let you know my new username once I'm ready.
I’m sad. I thought I was brilliant!
-
Inappropriate?Ok. My turn. The cheating label was wrong: I was pissed that you called me a cheater. Sorry. And you don't have to start a new account.
-
Inappropriate?Hi, jerry
I followed your controversial with rohan for a while. in my opinion, all of the early adopters have had advantages from biased market percentages. hubdub has corrected many of these behavioral inconsistencies in the past weeks.
I don't know if you yourself took advantage of these knowingly but i think others may have done so.
in this way it should be so that after the beta stage of the site all users should be reset in my opinion without the need to create new accounts.
i think your reaction to rohan is fair, not to say nobel. you take responsibility for what you said before.
I hope to see you again soon. -
Inappropriate?not wanting to take position solely for jerry here. your excuses are noble too, rohan :)
can we get back to work now?
-
Inappropriate?Thanks again.
However, I won't get any fun from the markets if my funds are tainted.
From what I've learned on this thread and others, simply resetting a users funds is somewhat problematic in that (for especially hubrich users), the market fluctuations would be severe.
btw: I'll have a lot of fun starting over.
kind of like most 'old men' dreams...
"if only I could be a teenager again and know what I know now"
I'm looking forward to testing the site (in beta) as a new user, but a new user with some experience. I expect to have a blast.
at you later folks!
I’m excited by the possibilities
-
Inappropriate?I am now hubdub user "cognos".
-
Inappropriate?Result of vote here: http://getsatisfaction.com/hubdub/top...
-
Inappropriate?It's interesting that there's no user at Hubdub called newscollecter or newscollector, and that they haven't disclosed their Hubdub name here. So they are able to accuse other players of cheating (with zero evidence), go on about making investigations (while preventing any investigation of who they are and their own question creation, prediction, and commenting history), and make a specious case for tolerating Satyaki (oh well, too little too late), all effectively anonymously.
Please disregard all comments made by this person unless they identify who they actually are (this goes doubly for the HD staff!).
Loading Profile...


EMPLOYEE


