Correcting six years' worth of downloaded financial data is crazy-making
I use Quicken 2006, and have used Quicken since 1993 and think I know the program. I cannot fix the following issue despite hours of trying. I set up the Renaming Rules for most of my Payees. I have all the right boxes checked in Preferences. Quicken is directed to atomatically use RRules when downloading transactions, and to make up RRules on the fly. Things went smoothly at first, so I know my copy of Quicken 2006 can do this, plus Quicken staff have twice emailed me a link to a new Q2006 program and I have reinstalled several times. The Support persons always have a different solution (delete and re-enter your Renaming Rules! "I know - you are using a MAC!!!" (No, one computer is an HP PC with Vista, the other is a laptop with Windows XP.), etc. for TWO YEARS.
When I download my data to Quicken, first: it goes directly into the Register and not into the holding area where I can check Transactions before Accepting them. Second: My data from, for example, my bank downloads into the Register using one Payee name for every transaction. I download, say, a month's worth of transactions and the same Payee name is used in each transaction; MBNA, Terasen (Gas) or whatever - there is a different Payee selected for the mass transactions every time I download. In the Memo box there is a lengthy entry which in addition to random numbers and letters does include a reference to the correct Payee, so I can go through the Register and correct the Payee information. I also have to enter the Category information because it doesn't download. Categories work with QuickFill. I have set up the RRules so that they are supposedly used whether the correct Payee reference is in the Payee or in the Memo box. I have tried RRules which select only Payee or only Memo for different names. I have deleted and re-entered a sample group in my RRules.
This problem occurs on both of my computers, and it occurs when I download from different institutions, e.g., my bank and Visa, so it's not the financial institution. Please do not suggest any solution which is referred to in Help or standard "Quicken how-to" books.
When I download my data to Quicken, first: it goes directly into the Register and not into the holding area where I can check Transactions before Accepting them. Second: My data from, for example, my bank downloads into the Register using one Payee name for every transaction. I download, say, a month's worth of transactions and the same Payee name is used in each transaction; MBNA, Terasen (Gas) or whatever - there is a different Payee selected for the mass transactions every time I download. In the Memo box there is a lengthy entry which in addition to random numbers and letters does include a reference to the correct Payee, so I can go through the Register and correct the Payee information. I also have to enter the Category information because it doesn't download. Categories work with QuickFill. I have set up the RRules so that they are supposedly used whether the correct Payee reference is in the Payee or in the Memo box. I have tried RRules which select only Payee or only Memo for different names. I have deleted and re-entered a sample group in my RRules.
This problem occurs on both of my computers, and it occurs when I download from different institutions, e.g., my bank and Visa, so it's not the financial institution. Please do not suggest any solution which is referred to in Help or standard "Quicken how-to" books.
1
person has this problem
I have this problem, too!
Tell me when someone solves it.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
-
Inappropriate?Hi Joan,
I am sorry you are having problems and will try to help. Is there some way we can contact you?
Thanks,
Colleen
I’m hopeful
-
Helllooooo! I've been giving you and Chelsea my contact information by return email, although I have not had a particularly good feeling about the efficacy of replying to an email that starts with "noreply.intuit@etc.". I get the feeling that - Whoops! Someone just answered my call to the phone number Intuit has on its website! My phone indicates I have been queued for 14:45 minutes.....hang on, brb.
(six minutes go by)
Well, that was pretty typical of what I've been up against for six years. A polite guy with a very strong accent (I only had to ask him to repeat one time, though - improvement!) answered and asked me what the problem was. Between you and me, I think I reached a call centre in India or Pakistan. Since either Chelsea or Colleen included a comment that she was in San Diego, I was dubious. But since the guy had said "how can I help you?", I explained my probable failure to contact Chelsea and Colleen, and requested contact with either one. I think I gave enough detail but not too much detail. In response, the guy asked for my name and phone number. I provided this information to him. Then he asked, "How may I help you?"
I said "I just told you how." I humoured him - gave a longer answer ...website...companies..customers...blog..questions commentsproblems....
The conversation continued until I'd been on the phone 20:07 minutes, when the guy said he had never heard of such a problem as mine, and asked me to take some action that sounded like it was going to take a long time and be really useless. I said, thanks, but I'll try a different route....
Hellllloooooo! are you there? I don't think you want me to post my telephone number on the blog, but I didn't figure out how to reply while I clicked everything that looked hopeful during the 14:45 minutes I was queued. There's probably an easy step I'm missing (blush).
Hellloooooo!.....
JEV -
Inappropriate?@JEV,
Hi there. You can go ahead and message your contact info here, and I can help get your problem fixed.
- Chelsea, Quicken
I’m hopeful too.
-
This reply was removed on 02/05/09.
see the change log
Loading Profile...



EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE