Loading Profile...
pgp
Sandy sends and receive messages without any kind of encryption. Therefore, third parties could be aware of the apointments. It might be a good idea for sandy to use PGP/GPG. She only needs to create a pair of keys and give away the public key, then the user would use his public key to sandy. This method is far from perfect, because, as it is not possible to verify the keys pesronally, there could be a man in the middle attack, but at least is better than nothing. Isn't it?
3
people like this idea
I like this idea!
Tell me when this idea gets some attention.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
-
Inappropriate?I was thinking the same thing as an option: right now, I'd be more please if Sandy didn't remember my key each as it if it was a todo item ;-)
So yes, adding support for public keys would be good: learning to ignore them would be better for now.
I’m amused
-
Inappropriate?Hi folks,
PQS, thanks for your thoughts on this: while it most likely isn't something we'll be working on in the near term, it's good to keep in mind.
Paul, if Sandy's confusing your key for a to-do (irony aside given PQS's request ;-), please can you provide an example (please do remove/change most of your key, naturally), we'll be glad to teach Sandy to avoid picking it (and those like it) up.
Happy Sunday to you both!
—Rael
The company thinks
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?Sandy would probably like something like http://www.certifiedmail.com, which would let her communicate privately without needing keys.
EMPLOYEE
