Loading Profile...
Discussing planned extensions as "pseudo-products"
Hi David! You'll note that GS allows you to create any number of "products" under the Mozilla banner.
Is it okay if we use this to seperate discussions about specific extensions being planned for TB? Meaning, we'd set-up planned extensions as "pseudo-products" under Mozilla?
I just think that'd make it easier for developers and "fans" to follow particular initiaitves.
Thanks!
Is it okay if we use this to seperate discussions about specific extensions being planned for TB? Meaning, we'd set-up planned extensions as "pseudo-products" under Mozilla?
I just think that'd make it easier for developers and "fans" to follow particular initiaitves.
Thanks!
I’m thankful
1 person has this question
I have this question, too!
Tell me when someone answers.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
-
Inappropriate?To keep things (more or less) under control, we'd just need to agree a naming convention, like "TB Extension: (Name)" of something like that...
I’m hopeful...
-
Inappropriate?Okay. I started a new TB thread Vote for TB extension/add-on ideas.
This is a set-up thread 'cause I'm thinking that just the moderator of this group should be allowed to set-up these extension/add-on "pseudo-products". This will focus dev efforts to the select few ideas the group really wants. Otherwise this group will become like all the other TB forums I've seen, with so many ideas going around nothing get's started!
The moderator would decide which ideas get created as pseudo-product based on how well they do in the voting stage.
What does everyone think?
I’m happy
EMPLOYEE