Is it better to create a 1.0 or a beta 2.0?
Hi ! I just created a wiki beta 2.0 for a group project to share informations, documents, schedule and discussions.
I would like to know if it is better to create a 1.0 to develop it rapidely (I have the impression that the beta 2.0 has fewer possibility now than the 1.0) or to wait for the beta 2.0?
The question is also: if I create a 1.0, is it going to become a 2.0 when this version will be available?
I would like to know if it is better to create a 1.0 to develop it rapidely (I have the impression that the beta 2.0 has fewer possibility now than the 1.0) or to wait for the beta 2.0?
The question is also: if I create a 1.0, is it going to become a 2.0 when this version will be available?
1
person has this question
I have this question, too!
Tell me when someone answers.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
-
Inappropriate?Eventually, all 1.0 wikis will have an opportunity to upgrade to a 2.0 wiki, but I can't give an exact time table on that. And of course, anybody can create a 2.0 wiki right now if you'd like to do that.
What "few possibilities" do you perceive 2.0 having compared to 1.0 at this point. Although it's a beta, I've been using it for a few tasks and it feels more fleshed-out to me than the 1.0 wikis, so I'd like to hear your opinion on that.
Thanks for your confidence!
1 person says
this answers the question
-
Inappropriate?I was wrong about the "few possibilities" of 2.0... It is far better than the 1.0
If my beta 2.0 simply become a 2.0 without big changes, it will be perfect for me !
I’m confident
-
Inappropriate?It would be nice to have some color options in 2.0 that last more than only 3 hours. The ability to add a little originality to everyone's wiki is always good.
I’m unsure of 2.0. Seems limited compared to 1.0 in some respects.
Loading Profile...




