@ggroovin's dashboard

A comment on the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

QUOTING...However, I'd argue there's fewer users who are interested in "Let me send messages to everyone that's at this place I'm at" and more who are into "Let me tell my friends but not my co-workers what I'm up to."

However, I'd argue there's fewer users who are interested in "Let me send messages to everyone that's at this place I'm at" and more who are into "Let me tell my friends but not my co-workers what I'm up to." – GS, on September 26, 2008 22:19

A comment on the discussion "Some nasty techniques used by Twitter Spammers" in Twitter:

I believe this feature no longer works, because I've seen people try to make (legitimate) links to it to make following them easier and they don't work. – Thomas, on August 07, 2008 17:31

Gail replied on August 07, 2008 14:10 to the discussion "Some nasty techniques used by Twitter Spammers" in Twitter:

Could Twitter block referrer info from their domain so when a person jumps to a site from a twitter page, the landing page won't have the referrer info? Also, would it help if Twitter used session variables on their site and when a user clicked on an external link, it would kill the session and not transfer any account info to the landing page?

A comment on the discussion "Some nasty techniques used by Twitter Spammers" in Twitter:

Yes, your user id stays with you forever, even if usernames are changed. Otherwise, we would lose our followers/friends with name changes. – mdy, on August 05, 2008 04:24

Ryan replied on August 05, 2008 03:11 to the discussion "Some nasty techniques used by Twitter Spammers" in Twitter:

What about spammers that change their identity? Isn't the Twitter ID (a number) unique?

Sean Percival replied on July 27, 2008 22:29 to the discussion "Some nasty techniques used by Twitter Spammers" in Twitter:

blogging about this here http://www.seanpercival.com/blog/2008...

A comment on the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

Perhaps if they're really buying Summize, they'll finally get behind the concept of hashtags. They are easy to use and don't require creating anything new. Summize + hashtags takes care of the scenario you describe here. (However, I think that's very separate from the concept of groups. Twitter would be smart to hop on that train; especially with FriendFeed and their "rooms.") – quepol, on July 09, 2008 22:42

Coby replied on June 19, 2008 18:17 to the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

I would like to understand how to use this better, but I am not happy with the "How it Works" portion. I want to invite people, then be able to address them directly. Once I have addressed them directly, will anyone else of my invites be able to see the message I have sent to 1 person? So confused!!!!!!!!!!! And How do I do a group send out? is this possible yet? – Coby

Todd Jones replied on June 12, 2008 03:23 to the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

when i think about groups for twitter, i think about sending an update as a kind of direct message to everyone in the group. to make sure they dont miss it.

judge mental replied on June 11, 2008 23:47 to the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

i mainly just want to be able to let my close circle of friends where i am, what i'm up to. i don't want an acquaintance or a frenemy or whatever knowing what's up and inviting themselves along.

A comment on the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

create a new twitter account for your inner circle and mark the updates as protected. sign up that account with http://grouptweet.com/ . you control who sees the updates (who is a member). – damon, on June 10, 2008 18:33

A comment on the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

For me, it's just a privacy thing. I'd like to let my closest friends know (geographically) where I am, without letting the whole world know where I am. So, I guess, a semi-private communication service; I could do it with multiple recipient SMS outside of Twitter, but I like and am now regularly using the twitter interface (and twitterberry) so it would be convenient to be able to tweet my inner circle in this way. – theclimbergirl, on June 10, 2008 18:10

Cameron Walters replied on June 10, 2008 17:58 to the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

Doesn't that somewhat defeat the purpose of having a public twitter stream? I'm trying to figure out if what people want in the groups feature is a way to not SMS-spam their "further" followers or actually some form of semi-private communications service.

Considering that Twitter sees itself as a "follow-based" or "recipient-based" service when each person chooses how much of the firehose they'd like pointed in their direction, my first conjecture about spamminess seems moot.

theclimbergirl replied on June 10, 2008 15:45 to the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

I really just would like to be able to identify an "inner circle" of real-life friends/family that I can send tweets to that don't go out to my whole follower list. E.g. if I want to tweet my "inner circle" that I'm doing dinner somewhere but don't want to tell my whole follower list.

A comment on the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

Privacy is definitely a must. I use two twitter accounts just because I use it so much for a private group (my band, we all use it via SMS) but I say things I would like to keep within that context. And I use another account via Twitterific just for regular twitter usage. If i could have one account where I could address a private group like this : dg myGroup ...

That would be awesome.

The conferencing ideas are pretty great as well, maybe a mixture of both features? – SweetMercury, on May 21, 2008 01:40

A comment on the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

Hi. You can do this now via a third-party service called GroupTweet. Each of you have your own individual Twitter accounts, and you just need to create an extra Twitter account that serves as the group account. Everyone can post to the group account; everyone can follow the group account. See http://www.grouptweet.com – mdy, on May 20, 2008 12:54

Ericson Smith replied on May 20, 2008 12:34 to the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

I'm not a crazy web 2.0 kind of guy really. Here, we just want to keep things simple. We're all gung-ho web developers and what we want is:

1. Setup a group of all 12 or 15 of us
2. Any one of us can tweet the group -- there is no leader or followers.

See, how much simpler can it be?

A comment on the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

Thanks for your thoughts, Chris. I haven't started using the hash tags yet. I'm not really sure how that works. Perhaps there's a post about it here on Get Satisfaction. :) – Amy Muller, on May 15, 2008 18:40

A comment on the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

Well, I don't give out my Twitter credentials lightly, and really, groups would only be marginally useful since it breaks the all-or-nothing paradigm of Twitter. While explicit groups have their place, hashtags have solved a part of the problem and otherwise I just use email. :1 – Chris Messina, on May 15, 2008 18:10

Amy Muller replied on May 15, 2008 17:53 to the question "When is Twitter going to get groups?" in Twitter:

Ah! Just noticed Chris Messina posted about jazzychad up above quite a while ago. Chris, did you ever try it?