Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
Arik replied on August 11, 2009 16:57 to the problem "Adding audio attachment does not work" in Socialcast:
Arik replied on August 11, 2009 14:34 to the problem "Adding audio attachment does not work" in Socialcast:
Arik reported a problem in Socialcast on August 11, 2009 12:45:
Adding audio attachment does not workWhen trying to add an audio file attachment to a post (less than 10 MB in size), the status bar shows "processing" and never completes.
Arik shared an idea in Socialcast on July 05, 2009 16:06:
Enable "permanent" information storageWe have been using socialcast now for about 2 months. It is serving well for improving our internal information flow by posting all kinds to information snippets and insights. Some of these posts are only relevant for a limited period of time. However, other posts contain valuable knowledge that ought to be preserved. Hence, I would consider it valuable, if a topic could be flagged (or proposed for flagging) as "permanent". Once a post is marked as permanent, a classification of the content should be requested (i.e. where it fits into the table of contents of the current information structure in the data repository) and subsequently be entered in a wiki-like repository, which allows further editing and adding of related/complementary information.
This approach may overcome the hurdle of traditional wiki systems, which initially are empty and thus it takes quite some work to get a wiki started. By allowing simple adding of content from socialcast, multiple starting points are naturally emerging and thus allow easy growing of wiki-like content around it. The only challenge remains in creating a proper structure that the content is entered into so that the data repository can be easily navigated. Categories (as defined for socialcast classifications) as well as tags could form the starting point for the structure. By enabling to add sub-categories, the category-approach could be further refined so that relevant information/topics can be found more easily.
Arik replied on July 05, 2009 15:51 to the idea "Enable refined filtering of live stream by category, team & groups" in Socialcast:
I recently noticed the option to create a customized real-time stream. This helps address some of the points I raised in my earlier proposal.
In order to make it really useful, I suggest adding the option to filter by teams. We have used your pre-defined "category" classification to reflect our team structure. Hence, we can associate posts by team (even though it is not as easy as it should be, since you have to edit the post manually to be able to select the category after having submitted the post). What is missing, however, is that people can be grouped into a team (or any other categories, which one may define; somewhat like in your group feature or the mail recipient grouping feature in Google Apps). This would allow someone from the marketing team to follow all posts by fellow marketing colleagues. Currently, one would need to follow all marketing colleagues or create a group to accomplish the same goal.
In general, we seek ways to improve communication in our organization and the more you enable us to customize socialcast to reflect our organization structure and processes, the more useful it becomes.
Arik shared an idea in Socialcast on June 07, 2009 17:11:
Enable easy identifying of unread postsI was on the road for a week. After coming back, I had trouble identifying, which post and comments I had already read. Hence, I suggest labeling both unread posts and comments. One way to reduce clutter could be to collapse already read comments (e.g. only showing name and posting date and "show" link; somewhat like how Digg collapses comments by importance rating) and posts (e.g. only showing first 3 lines).
Arik shared an idea in Socialcast on May 04, 2009 18:24:
Enable refined filtering of live stream by category, team & groupsInstead of the current filter methods, it would be helpful to be able to auto-filter the live stream by category (not only via drop-down, but permanent filter in live stream), team (not only following individuals, but groups of individuals, e.g. the marketing team consisting of 5 users) and content groups (i.e. any formed groups under your new groups feature). The intent is reducing the "clutter" of information that is not relevant to me as an individual, but to focus on the information topics (i.e. categories & content groups) and groups of individuals (i.e. teams) that I select.
In terms of implementation, I would consider it logical as a user to be able "to follow" any of these entities.
Loading Profile...
