Get your own customer support community

Recent activity

Subscribe to this feed
  • question

    atreiu asked a question in Songbird on July 31, 2009 13:32:

    atreiu
    Where is atreiu?
    I'm still here :o)

    I'm still in a hospital for some more weeks, and still (mostly) without internet/computer. I'll report back here, when I'm home.

    /(°v°)/=@
  • idea

    A comment on the idea "Starting a new Add-On Project" in Songbird:

    atreiu
    LOL, yeah, i love you too, guys... :>

    Hey LIB53, I see you are using GEdit, I used this in the beginning, too, but now I found Komodo Edit much better, and only use this now. You should take a look at it. I love the auto-complete for like every code (JS, XUL, CSS...), the project management and the powerful search & replace functions. And it's very easy and intuitive to use. – atreiu, on June 30, 2009 01:17
  • idea

    A comment on the idea "Awesome Library Bar!" in Songbird:

    atreiu
    @Murphy: Yeah, that's basically the way it will be done with Firefox, imho. I think that's the way, Ubiquity was meant from the beginning: to merge with the awesomebar/locationbar/searchbar to create a single and more powerful bar. But this may take another 1-2 years to work out well.
    However, to bring the ubiquity functionality to the awesomebar really seems to me the only thing that makes sense. An "awesome Library Bar" (ALB), as a "standalone-addon" will not work, imho. See: you guys are discussing a lot, what feature should be implemented in the ALB, which way the results should be displayed, if a websearch should be possible, or history, or how the results should be prioritized etc... All these questions wouldn't matter in a Ubiquity-Based Awesomebar (a.k.a.Taskfox), because all these features could be done as adjustable user-scripts, that the user can subscribe to or not. And these scripts can be done very easily, much easier & faster than creating an songbird-addon. Also Ubiquity has a powerful & improving linguistic backend, songbird- or songbird-addon-developers probably won't be able to code such things on their own, because of the lack of time.
    And you don't have to wait with the development of such user-scripts till Taskfox arrives, you can start right know using the Ubiquity.

    I just renew my 50Cent here: creating Ubiquity-Scripts for your features is the way to go, and when the time has come, integrate these scripts into Taskfox. Imho this is the only good way to realize your ideas. – atreiu, on June 29, 2009 16:40
  • idea

    A comment on the idea "Awesome Library Bar!" in Songbird:

    atreiu
    I don't see the "implemented label" here. It probably just was mis-tagged for a short time. There have been problems with these labels before, but they always got fixed after while. Nothing to worry about... – atreiu, on June 29, 2009 15:56
  • question
  • idea

    atreiu replied on June 28, 2009 22:37 to the idea "Starting a new Add-On Project" in Songbird:

    atreiu
    Hi Lib, I'm answering here, I think that makes sense ;)

    warning! long post! :>

    I can't help coding on this project (too busy with keeping all the other stuff up to date and still have a playlist for pure player to code), but maybe I can give you some advice on how to change the Layout.

    Basically, there are 3 ways to change the Layout:

    1.) XUL Overlays
    2.) Dynamical modifications via Javascript.
    3.) Using a complete new XUL-Layout.

    I have worked with all these: Pane Buttons are using 1), Q4 uses 2) and Pure Player uses 3). Here is my advice, but I discovered all this only by myself, though, I might wrong here and there. Anyway, what I found out:

    No 1.) Is best & easiest for adding things to Layout, but it was a mess, when I tried to move existing elements with it, especially the once that are "binded" (these have red children in the DOM-Inspector). If I tried to move the tab-bar for Q4 that way, it basically stopped working, I think because all the Listeners are broke by the movement. Also it is difficult to apply the Overlay only to a specific feather.

    No 2.) Is good for moving/changing & adding things to the Layout. One big benefit is, that you have more control over how and when things are moved, than with Overlays. But it's a lot more work than Overlays, so I wouldn't use it for just adding things. Also there might be modifications, that can't be done that way. Another reason i prefer this over No. 3 was, that I think it won't have to adept the skin very much, to get it to work with future Songbird-Version (if they add some buttons here and there, I don't have to repeat these changes. I would have, if I used No. 3)

    No 3.) Gives you full control over the look. Pure Player wouldn't be possible otherwise. However, it is very much work. Only the few elements I have in PP took quite a while for me, to understand them and get them to work. But this is the cleanest and most professional way, because Songbird doesn't have to change anything (that might go wrong), it just takes the new Layout-file and uses that one. You can do like everything with that.

    If I see your Mockups, No. 1) is not the best choice. I guess your changes might be possible with No. 2), but I think they are a little bit too complicated (status-bar under the progressbar, f.e.). So I think the way to do this right, would be No. 3. As I said, it's a lot of work, you might even have to change override some Bindings here and there. But it's possible.

    If I were you, I would take a really close look on the More Gonzo-Addon: It's "Alternate" view does pretty much exactly the ground-work you need: implementing a new Layout-XUL, that is basically the default XUL file, only with some small changes.
    That's what you should try to get to work in the first place: Create an extension that loads your own copy of Songbirds default XUL as a different layout. If you did this, start changing your layout-XUL slowly and try to adjust it step for step to your needs.
    For how to get a working AlbumArt into the Media-Pane, take a look at Pure Player or Medium Player (it requires some JS-Work, too).

    Besides the mdc (extremely useful!!!), what I found really helpful is the Search through Songbird source. It helped me a lot, to see how they do some things, and it helps with songbirds own functions & feature (that are not documented in mdc, and only a little bit on the SB-Wiki).

    Sorry for the long post, but it still would be nice, if a professional dev could comment it, to tell us if my post is completely nuts, or if I'm correct, at least here and there ;)
  • question

    atreiu replied on June 27, 2009 11:26 to the question "uninstall - all my custom stuff and add ons remain - why?" in Songbird:

    atreiu
    That behavior is very usual for applications based on Mozilla (like Firefox or Thunderbird).

    The reason is: all your data is stored in a Songbird-Profile, completely separated from the Application-Files. That's why reinstalling Songbird usually doesn't fix problems, but creating a new profile without reinstalling does.

    To do a complete uninstall of Songbird, that deletes the Profiles, too, check out this link:
    http://wiki.songbirdnest.com/Develope...

    To create a new profile (to fix problems), check out this link:
    http://wiki.songbirdnest.com/Getting_...

    This behavior is a little bit strange in the beginning, but if you get used to it, you will see that it has many advantages.

    If you have any further question, feel free to ask :-)
  • idea

    atreiu shared an idea in Songbird on June 27, 2009 09:47:

    atreiu
    How To: Make yourself a Songbird portable.
    I found an old tutorial on how to make yourself a Songbird portable on a famous german blog, and because it still seems to work and I think it might be useful for others too, here is my english translation.

    It's only for Windows, and of course it has some limitations regarding you music files (your music files have to be available through the same folders always), but it's still useful for a lot of tasks.

    For example if you have your music on an external storage device, then songbird can travel together with your music-storage, so you can just plug it into another computer. Songbird to go:

  • star

    atreiu marked one of Andrew Luecke's replies in Songbird as useful. Andrew Luecke replied to the question "songbird *really* slow".

  • question

    A comment on the question "songbird *really* slow" in Songbird:

    atreiu
    Thanks for this info, andrew!
    I always appreciate your up to date news. :-) – atreiu, on June 27, 2009 05:49
  • question

    atreiu replied on June 26, 2009 21:30 to the question "Why is the menu display a piece of garbage? I can't get anything done like this." in Songbird:

    atreiu
    Please let me know: did you have the YABS-Feather or Q4-Feather active?

    Because Saebekassebil had this problem with the last update of Q4, too, and I have a terrible apprehension... :>

    (I fear it might have something todo with my switch to jar-packaging)
  • praise

    atreiu replied on June 25, 2009 20:09 to the praise "Songbird Logo" in Songbird:

    atreiu
    I guess you are referring to the cute black birdies, and not the orange goldfish? ;)
    Yeah, these picture are sweeeet.

    You should contact Jonathan Koshi directly, afaik he did all the illustrations.

  • idea

    atreiu shared an idea in Songbird on June 25, 2009 17:11:

    atreiu
    "Create a new Profile"-Issue
    "Create a new Profile" - this is probably the most common advice & solution for many problems.

    While it is obviously in most cases the fastest or only way to get an ailing Songbird back on its little feet and therefore such an advice is very legitimate, it is also obviously a very unsatisfying solution, because the user probably looses a lot data & customization.

    There are some tools (like RatingFile or PlaylistExport), that can help to migrate at least some of the data. But still there is data you can't migrate (like settings, bookmarks, smart playlists, etc..). If you don't use "metadata writing", you even might loose your whole database.

    Here some suggestions (by priority):

    1.) Instead mainly curing the symptoms (create a new profile), there could be a greater effort to track down the causes, that lead to the problem in the first place. But I don't know, how this could be done...

    2.) Many problems appear after updating Songbird. On installation of a new Version, Songbird updates the profile, too, so there is no "way back", I can't just install the earlier version and use my working profile there. Maybe during the update process, Songbird should offer an option to backup the profile, to keep this backdoor open. (I do this manually, but many people don't.) Also it would be nice, if we could download older Songbird-Versions from the website (or is this possible already?).

    3.) It would be really nice to have a single & reliable tool, that allows to migrate as much stuff as possible from one profile to another (without migrating the problems, that might be the crux).

    In all the years I'm using Firefox, I only once created a new Profile (on switch to v 3.0), and could migrate most of my data.
    In Songbird, I myself haven't been able to use a single Profile for longer than one Songbird-Release and often lost more or less data. Because I know about this issue, I'm cautious with spending to much work on data, that might get lost anyway. It's sad, to not use the full ability of the bird, because of the fear of loosing data... an improvement here would really be appreciated :-)
  • idea

    atreiu replied on June 25, 2009 16:18 to the idea "Awesome Library Bar!" in Songbird:

    atreiu
    If anyone wants to work on the realization of this great idea:

    Probably the fastes & best way to implement it, is to write a user script for the Ubiquity-Addon (about:ubiquity). I can think only of Pros:

    1.) You don't have to worry much about interface implementation & add-on management stuff. You only need Javascript.
    2.) It would be available right now through Ubiquity.
    3.) Some time after Taskfox hits Firefox final, it probably will be available in Songbird, too. Ubiquity & Taskfox are very similar, so the script probably don't need many adjustments => voilà, we have our tuned awesomebar.
  • star

    atreiu marked one of Calydalyrymple's replies in Songbird as useful. Calydalyrymple replied to the question "How to use podcast on Songbird ?".

  • star

    atreiu marked one of Chris Wood's replies in Songbird as useful. Chris Wood replied to the question "How to use podcast on Songbird ?". atreiu and 3 other people think it's one of the best replies.

  • star

    atreiu marked one of Clamm's replies in Songbird as useful. Clamm replied to the question "Different questions about rating".

  • star

    atreiu marked one of Clamm's replies in Songbird as useful. Clamm replied to the question "Different questions about rating".

  • question

    atreiu replied on June 24, 2009 19:58 to the question "Equalizer in service pane" in Songbird:

    atreiu
    Pimp your Pony, Season 1:

    You can show it in the Bottom-Pane (and hopefully in the AlbumArt-Pane in the servicepane, soon, too):
    http://addons.songbirdnest.com/addon/...

    And you can pimp it with Presets, too (if you didn't already know that):
    http://addons.songbirdnest.com/addon/...

    Also spec the Pane Buttons - Addon, in the next version it will give you a Button to show/hide the Equalizer-Window. The update is probably coming out in the next few days...
    http://addons.songbirdnest.com/addon/...

  • star

    Ergil99's reply to "Where can I find the Songbird version-number (in Songbird 1.2)?" was just promoted to the most useful! atreiu and 3 other people think it's one of the best replies.

    Ergil99
    Isn't that just in Help -> About SongBird ?

    When I do that, at the top of the popup I get it says:
    Version: Songbird 1.2.0, Build 1146 (20090616030043)

    Is that what you're looking for?

    (FYI, I just downloaded Soungbird about an hour ago)
next » « previous