Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
DennisG replied on September 25, 2008 22:03 to the discussion "Recording internet radio cuts out speakers" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
Daniel Sandler replied on September 21, 2008 14:55 to the discussion "Recording internet radio cuts out speakers" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
audio person replied on September 17, 2008 19:16 to the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
yep, i'd echo the above comments, i'm also an audio engineer who uses various high end tools such as Pro Tools & Wavelab. Tapedeck is a great simple recording program that can be used in conjunction with these other programs. It currently is suitable for voice recording, but high quality music recording needs a lossless format.
I suggest FLAC
A comment on the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
I will buy TapeDeck the day it includes lossless audio. – jdueck, on August 24, 2008 05:30
A comment on the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
I will buy TapeDeck the day it includes lossless audio. – jdueck, on August 24, 2008 05:30
strangenotez replied on August 23, 2008 12:47 to the idea "Apple Remote control??" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
iRedLight can already do it. I hate having to use other apps to make the first one behave how I want, but iRedLight can control any program just about, and it's built to do it. This would leave the wonderful developer of this software more time to (please) tackle getting some BWF, WAV support going! audio engineers everywhere await this boon!
A comment on the idea "Apple Remote control??" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
apple remote has the ability to recognize buttons being held down, as well as double clicks. maybe a press and hold of the play/ pause to record, press again to stop, press again to play. if they don't build it in, I'm sure that iRedLight could handle the duty – strangenotez, on August 23, 2008 12:43
A comment on the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
I'm an audio production major at the Art Institute of Atlanta, as well as a recording engineer. I second what the first guy said. WAV support would really make this a tool that could be used by professional audio people. I'm already looking forward to using the lossy codecs to record class lectures on my macbook when I get it, but for song ideas, and even practice sessions, lossy won't cut it. you'd be suprised how many scratch recordings of guitar and vocal make it into the national release, because the first playthrough on that scratch disk had the most emotion. I don't have much to offer to inspire you to include WAV support, but if you're a beer drinker, I could promise you a box case of your brand!! – strangenotez, on August 23, 2008 12:27
Daniel Sandler replied on August 22, 2008 20:36 to the idea "how about tapedeck for iphone?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
A comment on the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
Uncompressed formats are actually specified by the AES and other concerned organizations as the best log term storage option for digitized audio. I'm a professional recording engineer, and the only thing keeping me from buying TapeDeck is that it doesn't support uncompressed recording. Compression--even lossless--isn't as appealing today as it was years ago when online (hard disk) storage was so expensive.
-Matt – Matt, on August 18, 2008 16:59-
andy jacobson started following the problem "Deleted feed still posting" in twitterfeed.
A comment on the problem "Deleted feed still posting" in twitterfeed:
April - when you enter your twitter account/password at https://twitterfeed.com/reminder, does it still show something? If you want me to take a closer look, please let me know your twitter username and the feed URL. – Mario Menti, on August 03, 2008 21:08
April replied on August 02, 2008 21:20 to the problem "Deleted feed still posting" in twitterfeed:
-
April started following the problem "Deleted feed still posting" in twitterfeed.
Sebbi replied on June 04, 2008 03:39 to the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
I too, love this idea. Infact, when I found it, my first thought was "Someone got there first" (I had been discussing a similar idea with a friend of mine who knows how to develop software).
I too would not be able to consider it seriously without Uncompressed audio, since I often use the demo as the starting point, and then use it in the final mix.
A comment on the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
I completely agree. I was planning to use TapeDeck for recording demos, until I found out that it doesn't have a lossless audio option. The highest fidelity option should be equal to whatever GarageBand's highest fidelity option is. – jdueck, on May 27, 2008 21:53
Sil replied on May 27, 2008 14:25 to the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
A comment on the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
I could happily live with Apple Lossless. But I'd want the higher bitrate and bitwidth (24/96) 'cos what I'm doing is digitising my LPs. There are a number of other products out there which seem to do the high quality (Audio Recorder works and is free; Sound Studio also lets you insert track markers und so weiter). But that's just my interests - I don't know how many more folk would be interested. – petewilson, on May 17, 2008 17:19
Chris Liscio replied on May 16, 2008 15:11 to the discussion "Website Intergration" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
Daniel Sandler replied on May 16, 2008 15:11 to the discussion "Website Intergration" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...






