Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
donnacha shared an idea in Bit Maki Software on December 24, 2008 21:08:
Instapaper IntegrationInstapaper is an excellent web service and Touch app that allows you to save the text of articles you find online for later reading.
From the Instapaper FAQ:
What does Instapaper do?
Instapaper facilitates easy reading of long text content.
We discover web content throughout the day, and sometimes, we don’t have time to read long articles right when we find them.
Instapaper allows you to easily save them for later, when you do have time, so you don’t just forget about them or skim through them.
The Instapaper Touch app which, with it's tilt-scrolling, is by far the best way to read text on the iPod Touch or iPhone, is already used by many of Textcast's target market.
Instapaper does provide it's users with an RSS feed but, unfortunately, this only provides the titles of the archived documents, not their actual content, so, when you subscribe to it via Textcast all you get is Alex reading out the titles!
If there was some way for Textcast to access the full content of the user's Instapaper saved documents, it would be the perfect combination, making both Textcast and Instapaper more useful. I am not a programmer but I'm guessing that the easiest way to achieve this would be if Instapaper allowed a full RSS feed.
A comment on the idea "Picture Comments" in IntenseDebate:
Great, thanks Michael, seems like the commenting niche is evolving at high speed these days :)
Keep up the good work! – donnacha, on December 22, 2008 21:44
A comment on the idea "Picture Comments" in IntenseDebate:
Thanks db0, good to know.
Of course, a more obvious route, one that didn't require code and another service to host the image, would encourage a wider range of people to post them. – donnacha, on December 22, 2008 21:44
donnacha shared an idea in IntenseDebate on December 22, 2008 20:10:
Picture CommentsIntenseDebate competitor JS-Kit have just implemented a new feature, Picture Comments, which seems so obvious, so much simpler but more useful than the YouTube integration they added last week.
The Picture Comments feature allows commenters to upload an image and displays a thumbnail of that image within the comment, linking to the full-size version. This not only adds visual interest to comments but would be invaluable for screenshots when technical matters are being discussed. Actually, scratch that: most subjects, ranging from celebrity gossip to travel tips would benefit from commenters being able to upload images.
As it happens, JS-Kit's implementation is not half as good as it could be: clicking on the thumbnail simply opens the full-size photo, on its own, in another tab. This is surprising as, clearly, it would be a lot nicer to have them open lightbox-style.
Last time I looked, the best-looking lightbox implementation was Cabel Sasser's FancyZoom which is proprietary but there are plenty of free and open source versions too, they may well have caught up by now. FancyZoom does not rely upon any of the Javascript frameworks because it was coded from scratch, purely for zooming thumbnails.
It would be great to see ID offer a better implementation of Picture Comments.
If possible, it would also be smart for ID's version to allow commenters to upload their photos to the site owner's server, rather than ID's own server - this would remove any bandwidth or legal considerations that might be holding ID back from offering such an attractive feature.-
donnacha started following the idea "Video comments with Viddler" in IntenseDebate.
-
donnacha started following the problem "Two other WP plugins vanished after installing IntenseDebate" in IntenseDebate.
-
donnacha started following the question "Seesmic Video Comment support" in IntenseDebate.
-
donnacha started following the question "How do i get intense debate on my wordpress.com hosted blog without using the wordpress.org software?" in IntenseDebate.
-
donnacha started following the question "Claiming Comments Made through FriendFeed" in IntenseDebate.
donnacha replied on December 18, 2008 15:38 to the idea "easyComment Firefox Extension - not compatible with IntenseDebate" in IntenseDebate:
You are unbelievable - you just seem to want to post in every single thread without actually reading the original posts. I say, clearly, in the last paragraph, that I have posted about ID at the developer's site and, the whole point of the post, I suggest that other ID users post too, so that he knows there is a demand for this.
Please, stop haunting me, it's getting embarrassing.
donnacha shared an idea in IntenseDebate on December 18, 2008 03:14:
easyComment Firefox Extension - not compatible with IntenseDebateeasyComment is a really useful Firefox extension:
"easyComment enables you to One-Click Comment on Wordpress Blogs which makes it an perfect tool for people who comment on a lot of different Weblogs and who don’t want to sign up on every single one.
You’ll have to define your Personal Data once in the Preferences Dialog and every time you click the easyComment Button on the bottom Status Bar in your Firefox window, it searches the comment form on the current page and fills it with your data saving you a huge chunk of type-in work."
Wonderful idea, works great on standard WordPress, both self-hosted and WordPress.com, but does not yet work on Wordpress blogs using IntenseDebate, Disqus or JS-Kit.
Does work when your are signed in via Facebook Connect, on WordPress sites with Facebook Connect integrated into the standard WordPress commenting system, such as TechCrunch.
I have posted a comment on the easyComment page, asking for future versions to accommodate ID, Disqus and JS-Kit - if anyone else is interested in this, it wouldn't hurt to add a comment of your own asking for the same thing :)
donnacha marked one of Michael Koenig's replies in IntenseDebate as useful. Michael Koenig replied to the problem "Why can't I remove a social link from my profile?".
donnacha replied on December 17, 2008 22:57 to the idea "Could IntenseDebate End Run Around Disqus and Facebook Connect?" in IntenseDebate:
Some sobering numbers, from this Data Center Knowledge article, released today, which reveal just how big the Facebook elephant is:
Facebook Adding 600,000 Users A Day
... and Facebook's own statistics page.
More than 140 million active users (previously, in the other thread, we had been saying 130 million).
Average user has 100 friends on the site - all of whom can view comments injected into the user's feed.
More than 13 million users update their status every day.
600,000 new users per day.
- “If Facebook continues at this rate, it could add up to 20 million new users in December and reach 200 million active users by March,”
More than 70% outside the US.
35 translations available, more than 60 in development, so, lots of room for growth.
donnacha replied on December 17, 2008 20:06 to the idea "Facebook Connect." in IntenseDebate:
Dude, you don't seem to even TRY to understand what other people say, or to follow ANY of the links. If you did, you'd realize that I was referring specifically to the video that shows ordinary people how to add FC in 8 minutes by, you know, typing the code. For 8 minutes.
You'd also have noticed that Techcrunch got a 20% bump in comments - that is a cold, hard fact, one that won't disappear simply because you, personally, don't think it could or should make a difference.
I don't mind well though-out and argued criticism, but you seem to just wander around this website, shooting down everything anyone else has to contribute - I've yet to see you make a positive comment of any kind. I honestly can't imagine what world you live in if you don't think the potential of Facebook as a competitor is not a serious consideration for both ID and Automattic. Seriously, are you a bot? Did someone create you as part of a bet?
If you could just slow down and think before you shoot, you might actually pick up some new ideas.
And you probably wouldn't make dumb mistakes like duplicate posting.
donnacha shared an idea in IntenseDebate on December 17, 2008 19:52:
Could IntenseDebate End Run Around Disqus and Facebook Connect?So, we've been reacting to Disqus allowing Facebook Connect logins, and the conclusion I personally came to was that FC was a good way to tempt newbies to start commenting because it lowers the psychological barrier of having to sign up to yet another service BUT, once that newbie properly develops the commenting habit, they will inevitably "upgrade" to their own ID account, because it clearly does a good job of conveying information about you and showing your other posts, much better than the completely useless public profile that FC comments link to. This is an advantage that Disqus and ID have which FB cannot beat.
FC'd comments, do, however, have one big advantage that will appeal greatly to blog owners: each is optionally repeated in the commenter's FB feed. One average, each FB user has 100 friends who can view their feed and are likely to have similar interests. If only a small percentage click through to see the context of their friend's comment, that represents a real boost, especially as they will be more likely to join the discussion than random traffic.
So, when your newbie commenter, who used his FB membership as an easy gateway into the habit of commenting, decides to upgrade to having an ID membership, the one thing that you and they lose is the added distribution that FB gave.
So, I got to thinking, what if people signed-in to ID could also have that option to automatically add their comments to their FB feeds?
Wouldn't that be the best of both worlds?
It seems to me that there should be some way to do that via the FC API, even if it means having each FC-enabled ID member logged into FC in the background. Am I correct in thinking that FC is quite malleable, especially in contrast to the self-contained Google Friend Connect?
Another route might be to create a FB app which could receive RSS updates from ID and inject their new posts into the user's FB feed.
Either way, it would completely grab the lead back from Disqus and be a real boon to ID users and blog owners.
A comment on the idea "Facebook Connect." in IntenseDebate:
db0, I think you're missing the point. The option to sign in using an account they already have at Facebook, into which they've already invested their time and uploaded a photo, lowers the barrier to participation for 130+ million people.
After just 12 days, 20% of Techcrunch commenters were using Facebook Connect, and that is a BIG blog that already had lots of users, most of them signed-up, regular visitors; the effect on a small blog would be far more dramatic, because you would have a larger portion of non-committed, passing traffic who have no interest in becoming members but might, just might, be willing to make a comment if it is easy enough for them and they already see their smug little face smiling out at them, appealing to their ego and letting them know that they are already signed-in.
For low-readership blogs (and the vast majority of them are), this could be the tipping point that gets them ten comments rather than none. It also means that more comments are accompanied by avatars, making the discussion more attractive and credible, making your blog stickier.
Appearing in each commenter's Facebook feed (which is an OPTION) is the most personal and, therefore, effective endorsement imaginable - the commenter is saying "Hey, look at this conversation I'm having!". Yes, it is small-scale, limited to their circle of friends, but the chances are high that they have similar interests and, therefore, will be interested in your blog.
Don't forget, the commenter will now also be addressing two audiences: your blog's readership AND their own friends, giving a deeply personal incentive to make a well-written, positive contribution. They are getting a double return on their investment of time in making the comment: joining your discussion but also adding content to their Facebook presence. Facebook integration will increase the quantity, quality and distribution of your blog's comments.
Of course, those are all advantages for ID users but not necessarily ID itself. Trust me, this is a political / strategic decision that probably has ID terrified, the technical side is trivial and not something that is going to detract resources from your pet interests - it takes 8 minutes to integrate Facebook Connect, by hand not plugin, into an individual WordPress blog, it would not take more then an hour to make the same change to the ID system, they probably already have a test version running with Facebook integrated.
Make no mistake, the big issue here is not HOW to do this but whether or not they SHOULD be getting into bed with a giant who could, quite easily, roll over and crush them - Techcrunch have written an interesting article about this,
Soon, All Your Blog Comments Will Belong To Facebook (Or Google), and the comments are worth reading too.
The key question for ID is whether whey would be undermining the incentive for commenters to sign up to ID itself, when they can simply keep using their Facebook identity. Of course, serious commenters will quickly realize that there are advantages to skipping Facebook and using an ID account instead: Facebook-Connected comments link only to your PUBLIC Facebook profile, which is pretty much useless, revealing almost nothing about you, whereas your ID profile displays your other comments AND links to your blogs, Facebook page and other social networks, Twitter etc.
Unless Facebook decide to start archiving comments themselves (and it is highly unlikely that they will change their whole model to pursue such a niche market, especially as it would kill all trust in their developer community), Disqus and ID will retain this advantage, and commenters will realize this pretty quickly once they develop the commenting habit. ID should be confident and see Facebook Connect as a way to entice newbie commenters into becoming participants, knowing that they will graduate to becoming ID members in time. This is a great way for ID and Disqus to grow piggyback on Facebook's massive userbase and peel away some of it for themselves, while keeping blog owners happy too. – donnacha, on December 17, 2008 16:07
A comment on the idea "Facebook Connect." in IntenseDebate:
Hey, Jonathan, good to see a high profile ID user asking for this too!
It would be good to hear the whole issue of commenting systems discussed on the next WordPress Podcast i.e. what you gain balanced against what you lose in terms of control and ability to implement features yourself. I think this is going to be a big issue over the next year and this Facebook Connect situation illustrates it nicely. – donnacha, on December 16, 2008 23:33
donnacha replied on December 16, 2008 20:46 to the idea "Facebook Connect." in IntenseDebate:
Wow, Disqus have grabbed the initiative on this, according to a blog post today by Disqus CEO Daniel Ha.

Mashable have a good article, explaining why this is such an important move: Disqus to Integrate Facebook Connect.
The key points in that article:
Facebook Connect created a bit of a problem for third-party commenting plugins like Disqus. One of the original premises of their business – that having one login that worked across blogs would increase comments – is severely threatened by Facebook, who has 130+ million users already. Not to mention, when blogs utilize Facebook Connect for their comments, they are fed back into the Facebook News Feed, creating extra traffic.
Today, Disqus is wisely responding, letting its customers know that they will soon be integrating Facebook Connect.
...
Problem solved for Disqus? Maybe. The service still has lots of advantages over simply integrating Facebook Connect into your blog, like giving users their own profile to keep track of their comments, easy installation including a WordPress plugin, video integration with Seesmic, and support for trackbacks.
Svetlana Gladkova also has some interesting thoughts on the integration of Facebook Connect into commenting systems such as Intense Debate and Disqus:
The viral growth effect is very similar to what you get when you ask your visitors to bookmark your site on Delicious or vote for it on Digg - but in this case you will only have to ask users once if they want their activities on the site to be sent back to Facebook and broadcasted to all their friends on the social network via news feeds. So once the confirmation is here every time a user performs an action on the site, the site owner will get some additional free visibility - what really can be more appealing for web publishers?
We all know that an owner of any website will hardly want to avoid using an additional marketing channel to promote the website where your own visitors will help you get extra visibility for your content. And of course blogges are no exception, especially those blogging professionally and trying to get any extra monetizable traffic we can so I’d expect bloggers more than willing to support Facebook Connect program.
And it is quite understandable: after all, usually your post only has chances of appearing on Facebook when you write something particularly good that people will find interesting enough to share with their friends - but that takes a couple of extra steps, including your reader thinking about actually helping you promote your content and posting it to Facebook. But if you support Facebook Connect in commenting functionality of your blog, your readers will be able to help your content get some extra visibility every time they leave a comment using Facebook for their credentials. I expect we will see Facebook Connect plugins for popular blogging platforms launched pretty soon for every blogger to be able to implement the functionality easily on a blog.
...
So I’d expect many professional blogs adding Facebook Connect functionality in the nearest days while dedicated blog commenting services like Disqus should really think about supporting Facebook Connect themselves - at least to keep the bloggers they already work with happy with their commenting functionality instead of returning to standard commenting functionality with Facebook Connect supported.
My personal guess is that, unless ID are absolutely confident that the weight their purchase by Automattic gives them is enough to ignore the 130+ million Facebook users, they really don't have a choice, they have to integrate it.
But, again, the political considerations within Automattic are going to be the main barrier, not the technical challenge.
Personally, though, this is a MUST HAVE FEATURE before adopting ID on all of my websites.
A comment on the idea "Facebook Connect." in IntenseDebate:
As I understand it, Google's Friend Connect would be pretty much impossible to integrate with ID, all you can really do with it is insert self-contained widgets that don't actually interact with the rest of your site or your database.
Facebook Connect, however, has an API that would integrate pretty smoothly with ID on the technical level but, of course, the politics of it is quite a different thing: it would make WordPress and ID more accessible to the massive Facebook userbase but Automattic might worry that integrating in any way could harm their chances of later selling to one of the other big players.
Personally, I reckon that encouraging the Facebook masses to participate more on ID sites would actually do a lot to improve Automattic's valuation but, of course, at this stage, with so much at stake, they're probably terrified of making the wrong moves. – donnacha, on December 15, 2008 21:25
donnacha marked one of Jon's replies in IntenseDebate as useful. Jon replied to the question "Integrated Voting, Star-Ratings".
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...




