Fred's dashboard

Looking back, I realize that my question was worded in a less than gracious way and no doubt contributed to your feeling justified in acting as if I made statements that I did not make (moral connotation, boogieman spell) and accusing me of complaining when I was genuinely trying to ask what I thought was a legitimate question (again acknowledging my mistake in the way I posed it).

I am also sorry if the way I posed the question is what led you to presume to judge my motives and my character - indirectly accusing me in your "mood" signature of being a person who would "complain about absolutely anything at all to feel superior to others".

Please allow me to explain in greater detail my concern. When I saw the attribution of the reading plan, I took it (and believe most reasonable people would) as a tacite approval and possibly even a recommendation of Robert Roberts (who I had never heard of before). When I Googled to find out more I realized somewhere along the way that a new believer or seeker could follow that same thought process and potentially be led astray thinking that Youversion or Lifechurch.tv was recomending Robert Roberts and his teaching.

It just seemed unnecessary to potentially put someone in harms way spiritually when there are so many other reading plans available or when you could have simply devised a new one. – Fred, on January 05, 2009 19:50