Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
Galen Thurber replied on November 18, 2009 19:36 to the idea "FIGHT for your accounts! How I got mine back after 18 days! Read on." in Facebook:
Galen Thurber marked one of XxjErOxX's replies in Facebook as useful. XxjErOxX replied to the question "facebook account disabled".
A comment on the question "facebook account disabled" in Facebook:
sorry for your troubles, but FB is not a good place to hang. Many long time internet users have been pointing this out for some time. Facebook does not follow any law nor is it honest with users. FB does disable many many innocent people, all the time keeping the user's money and private information. Imagine getting kicked out of school for no reason and they wont tell you why, they kep your books clothes, electronics... FB is not a honest company, they trick people and regulators. They use a loophole, they disable accounts and place them in limbo so they can bypass privacy law.
Friends don't let friends use facebook, no joke – Galen Thurber, on September 24, 2009 20:35
Galen Thurber replied on August 20, 2009 21:02 to the idea "Who to contact when Facebook ignores you" in Facebook:
I still bang my head on the wall, why are people still supplying FB with valuable information and allowing FB to pocket funds associated with your account. Tell FB they are not worthy of personal information nor funds you sent them. FB is a con, demand your money and privacy back and quit being chumps and sycophants.
Galen Thurber replied on August 19, 2009 20:43 to the question "facebook account disabled" in Facebook:
Facebook is not affiliated with Get Satisfaction.
There is no internet regulation.
FB has no accountability.
Facebook needs to be exposed just like how United Airliners was exposed by the broken guitar video.
FB will deactivate you, keep your images, keep your money. So will you join up again or expose them? I hope the later.
A be sure to make your "decision final"
Galen Thurber shared an idea in Facebook on May 25, 2009 20:21:
A comment on the question "Account Disabled. All my Comments are deleted. Is there a chance for me to get it back, or it's gone forever?" in Facebook:
FB has different limits for persons of different sex, religion.
I have seen a fake user account that could add over 100 friends, had no message limits, no captchas. The fake user was a single Catholic female. FB aggressively discriminates that is why they are fiercely against any disclosure of policy. FB will never tell – Galen Thurber, on May 25, 2009 17:09
A comment on the question "Account Disabled. All my Comments are deleted. Is there a chance for me to get it back, or it's gone forever?" in Facebook:
sorry but you are kidding. A millionaire is not going to listen any petition. He already directed staff to delete users who expose privacy violations by staff. MZ is very accomplished liar.
The only way FB will get exposed is through bad media and media outlets are failing in that regard.
Don't give FB the satisfaction of your deserved anger,get others to leave FB – Galen Thurber, on May 25, 2009 17:03
Galen Thurber replied on May 21, 2009 13:32 to the question "Revoke Facebook's Pact rating since they do not respond or honor the Pact." in Facebook:
Galen Thurber asked a question in Facebook on May 21, 2009 13:31:
Revoke Facebook's Pact rating since they do not respond or honor the Pact.Facebook is committed to open conversation about its products and services. Conversations should be conducted in the spirit of the Company-Customer Pact.
Galen Thurber shared an idea in Facebook on May 21, 2009 13:29:
Canadians are fighting back against the privacy violations.from: Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
TO: Privacy Commissioner of Canada
112 Kent Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 1H3
Summary of PIPEDA Complaint
To summarize, we submit that Facebook is in violation of the following PIPEDA provisions in
the following regards:
Principle 4.2 – Identifying Purposes:
Principle 4.2.2
Principle 4.2.2 requires that an “organization identify the purpose for which personal information
is collected at or before the time of collection” and that an “organization collect only the
information necessary for the purposes that have been identified.”
• Facebook allows third party application developers to access User information that is
beyond what is necessary to operate their applications.
Principle 4.2.3
Principle 4.2.3 sets out that “the identified purposes should be specified at or before the time of
collection to the individual from whom the personal information is collected.”
• Facebook does not precisely identify why Users’ information is collected from other
sources.
Principle 4.2.4
Principle 4.2.4 sets out that “when personal information that has been collected is to be used for
a purpose not previously identified, the new purpose shall be identified prior to use. Unless the
new purpose is required by law, the consent of the individual is required before information can
be used for that purpose.”
• Facebook reserves the right to modify or add to its Terms of Use without notice.
• Facebook retains deceased Users’ profile for memorial reasons, a new purpose.
Principle 4.2.5
Principle 4.2.5 recommends that information collectors “should be able to explain to individuals
the purpose for which the information is being collected.”
• Facebook does not explain to Users why third party application developers need access
to all their User information.
Principle 4.3 – Consent:
Principle 4.3.1
Principle 4.3.1 sets out that “consent is required for the collection of personal information and
the subsequent use or disclosure of this information.”
• Facebook does not obtain the consent of non-Users to collect their information from
Users, to share their information with other Users, and to retain their information.
Principle 4.3.2
Principle 4.3.2 sets out that “organizations shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the
individual is advised of the purposes for which the information will be used” and that meaningful
consent requires that “the purposes must be stated in such a way that the individual can
reasonably understand how the information will be used or disclosed”.
• Facebook does not make a reasonable effort to ensure that Users are advised of:
o The purposes for which their dates of birth will be used;
o The purpose of using User information for Social Ads;
o All the types of information that are shared with third party application developers,
including Friends’ information; and
o The purpose behind retaining information of Users who have deactivated their
accounts.
Principle 4.3.3
Principle 4.3.3 sets out that “an organization shall not, as a condition of the supply of a product
or service, require an individual to consent to the collection, use, or disclosure of information
beyond that required to fulfill the explicitly specified and legitimate purposes.”
• Facebook requires Users, as a condition of use of its service, to:
o Provide their dates of birth despite that its purpose for doing so is not explicitly
specified; and
o Participate in one variation of Social Ads despite that this activity is beyond that
required to fulfill Facebook’s explicitly specified and legitimate purpose of social
networking.
• Facebook requires Users, as a condition to use of third party platforms, to:
o Share personal information with third party application developers that is beyond
what is required to fulfill the purposes of the applications.
• Facebook retains non-Users’ email addresses for purposes beyond sending them an email
to invite them to Facebook.
Principle 4.3.6
Principle 4.3.6 sets out that “an organization should generally seek express consent when the
information is likely to be considered sensitive.”
• Facebook does not obtain express consent to share sensitive information in the following
ways:
o Users’ information with other Users in joined Networks;
o Users’ photo albums and associated comments with everyone;
o Users’ name and picture searchable to everyone;
o Users’ information with third party application developers and with third party
advertisers;
o Non-User’s information, including photographs, with Users; and
o To retain Users’ information after they deactivate their accounts.
Principle 4.3.8
Principle 4.3.8 sets out that “An individual may withdraw consent at any time, subject to legal or
contractual restrictions and reasonable notice.”
• Facebook does not permit active Users to withdraw consent from the Social Ads that are
displayed in the left hand “Ad Space” of their Profiles.
• Facebook does not inform Users who withdraw consent to share their personal
information with third party application developers that all their applications will be lost.
• Facebook does not permit Users who effectively withdraw consent to share their
information by deactivating their accounts to do so.
Principle 4.4 – Limiting Collection:
Principle 4.4.1
Principle 4.4.1 sets out that “both the amount and type of information collected must be limited
to what is necessary to fulfill the purposes identified.”
• Facebook allows third party application developers to collect information beyond what is
necessary to run the applications.
Principle 4.4.2
Principle 4.4.2 sets out that “consent with respect to collection must not be obtained through
deception.”
• Facebook deceives Users about its purposes for collecting personal information and
about the level of User control over their personal information.
Principle 4.5 – Limiting Use, Disclosure, and Retention:
Principle 4.5.2
Principle 4.5.2 sets out that “organizations should develop guidelines and implement procedures
with respect to the retention of personal information.”
• Facebook does not indicate the retention period for Profiles of Users who have
deactivated their accounts anywhere on its Privacy Policy or website.
Principle 4.5.3
Principle 4.5.3 sets out that “personal information that is no longer required to fulfill the
identified purposes should be destroyed, erased, or made anonymous”.
• Facebook does not guarantee that personal information that has been disclosed to third
party application developers will be destroyed once a User removes an application from
Facebook.
• Facebook retains Users’ personal information after they have terminated their accounts,
when their information is no longer necessary to serve Facebook’s identified purpose of
social networking.
Principle 4.7 – Safeguards:
Principle 4.7.1
Principle 4.7.1 sets out that an organization shall have security safeguards that “shall protect
personal information against loss or theft, as well as unauthorized access, disclosure, copying,
user, or modification.”
• Facebook enables a cookie of indefinite length on a User’s mobile device, which could
potentially allow others to access the User’s Facebook account.
Principle 4.8 – Openness:
Principle 4.8.1
Principle 4.8.1 sets out that “individuals shall be able to acquire information about an
organization’s policies and practices without unreasonable effort.”
• Facebook does not make its policies on the range of personal information that is
disclosed to third party application developers available on their general website.
• Facebook does not disclose that it uses technology to actively search for anomalous
behaviour.
We request that you investigate Facebook’s practices with a view to its compliance with
PIPEDA. We await your findings. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the undersigned.
Yours truly,
A comment on the problem "FACEBOOK KEEPS WARNING ME WHEN SOMEONE SUGGESTS A FRIEND TO AD I WILL BE BLOCKED FOR MISUSINGG AND HARRASSING! OK???"" in Facebook:
good people are trying – Galen Thurber, on May 21, 2009 13:26
Galen Thurber replied on May 07, 2009 12:08 to the question "I Hit a Common Problem - Facebook Account is Disabled" in Facebook:
Galen Thurber replied on May 07, 2009 11:43 to the idea "Facebook blog link, lists some employees" in Facebook:
Galen Thurber replied on April 27, 2009 11:31 to the question "Account Disabled. All my Comments are deleted. Is there a chance for me to get it back, or it's gone forever?" in Facebook:
Facebook's latest con is the new "voted on" Terms of Use. FB new rule states you can delete your account (which is strongly advised) and that you own your content, but and I mean a big but, FB will disable your account so you don't have access to it, meaning they keep your content.
Why bother to re-enable your account and be a slave to a company that is so slimy, ask yourself why.
A comment on the discussion "13 Reasons your Facebook account will be disabled" in Facebook:
Grant, you should this as a topic. well stated – Galen Thurber, on April 25, 2009 12:56
A comment on the discussion "13 Reasons your Facebook account will be disabled" in Facebook:
Actually one person reporting you does not get you disabled. So don't assume it was your fault. Considering the way FB poorly operates you'd be much better to assume they wanted you to grovel. FB will disable for no reason, the victim/sucker will sign up again and buy game points, gifts all over again. Assume that is what is going on. one million people buying 5$ in gifts is easy money. I'd assume you do buy gifts and spend money on FB, that is why you are back – Galen Thurber, on April 25, 2009 12:54
Galen Thurber replied on April 24, 2009 11:42 to the question "WHY HAS MY ACCOUNT BEEN COMPROMISED???" in Facebook:
There is more to life than Facebook, the best thing you can do is to tell others how bad FB is. Unlikely FB will respond with anything that makes sense, they'll respond with some totally irrelevant stock message. Most likely you will need to file a report with people concerning identity theft, the police will then contact FB. FB will stall and not cooperate. Don't believe those who say they got their accounts back, people brag, people lie.
peace
PS try password safe program and the http://www.ning.com/ social network
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...








