jimbo's dashboard

I agree with BC on this matter. Any resignation or firing now could easily be attributed to any numbers of reasons for such a high profile editor as Bill Kellor, and furthermore those reasons may be public knowledge or not. Worth bearing in mind is that for whatever reason, this story is now off the news agenda and seems unlikely to rear its head for the next 12 weeks or the foreseeable future. The time for a sacking has passed and it looks unlikely he'll be resigning anytime soon.

well the white ants wasn't my fault but I'm not sure about the vibrator thing. The dog ate some vindaloo curry the other night left on the table by a hooker so I'd like to think I wasn't responsible.

I'd just like to say that I am actually drunk as a skunk hence the spelling errors. My dog has IBD, my girlfriend left for a vibrator salesman and I've got white ants in the floorboards.

Hey Fingers of Fury, can I rename you Fists of Fury?

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/sh...

Tisha, this case lacks mathematical logic in addition to evidence from a online news source that indeed they didn't reach a million signatures.

Get it was gamed eh Fists of Fury? Who would've bothered hacking
the site to produce insane figures? Let's ask Diaego, who are sure to
confirm they were f""""ed over locally by a hacker to produce a false
result. I'm kidding of course. Just a joke! How on earth can we confirm that a corporate website was either hacked or deliberately gamed by Diaego to produce PR hype?

Anyway, can we settle for "No" - I'd like my $303. BTW Fists of Fury, how much did you have staked on this? A thousand? How would you receive if the outcome was indeed a million signatures? just for the record. Or did the jump on the graph from 30% to 90% indicate a bigger stake? i should've jumped in them with my no eh?

It's now 264K or so. 15 hours ago it was 250. This works out to about 1000 or so an hour signatories. To reach a million signatures, it'll take roughly 40 days. At that rate, it'll take 13 months to reach 10 million.

This March 4th article suggests there were about 94,000 signatories at that time (906,000 needed)

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/blogs/b...

Possibly the extra signatories were from a count done from pubs.. and added online - who knows? Guinness does, and I'm sure they'll publish final figures one they submit the petition in a day or so, US time.

http://www.silive.com/newsflash/index...

Hell, there's a good little story in this for sure! 1.7M?

Thanks Tisha! Let's see how that pans out - appreciate your efforts on this - I'll keep an eye open online myself for any further relevant info.

I mailed a friend in Texas, he checked online and it now lists 249,481.

I'd like the questioned resettled as "no".

http://proposition317.com/stpats.html

Hi Tisha.. it's midnight now here in Tokyo, and I just hopped online, signed the peitition, and that site listed 243,915 signatures. (so its going up as I type this...) I guess its possible the servers handling asia for this website haven't been updated this weekend hence the difference. Still... something seems wrong. If proposition 3-17 did get a million signatures, wouldn't it be a news item by now? This means St Paddy's day would go before the Congress to be considered as a legit public holiday. The site lists the number of people who have signed it - I think it's only necessary to sign in the birthdate to access the page that lists the number of people who have signed. It shouldn't matter where you access the website - the information should reflect globally the same information, unless of course there's been a local hack (which won't reflect globally).

Tisha, can we leave this open for a few days? Something isn't adding up - perhaps the servers need to "update" my end (but I doubt this is the problem). Wouldn't it be news if it was successful? Could we have other sources verifying this outcome?

What do you think?

I think it's void too. Purple isn't listed. If purple was listed, somebody would have chosen it and there would have been a definitive outcome. But there was no purple, and neither red nor blue is purple. So it's void - not an unreasonable conclusion to an otherwise very well worded question.