jtwilkins's dashboard

jtwilkins replied on February 27, 2008 05:21 to the problem "Missing Twitters/updates" in Twitter:

Me, username JWilk is still missing updates from JasonCalacanis and most likely Scobeizer (hard to tell because both fix and his last post were same time)

jtwilkins replied on February 20, 2008 20:42 to the problem "Missing Twitters/updates" in Twitter:

This is really getting frustrating I am still having this problem and it has been well over a week now. Twitter is lucky they are the only act it town. They are become a joke in the tech community with there service outages and problems.

jtwilkins replied on February 14, 2008 18:17 to the problem "Missing Twitters/updates" in Twitter:

I am also not receiving all my tweets. User name jwilk in less then an hour I am missing tweets from Scobleizer and JasonCalacanis

jtwilkins started following the problem "Missing Twitters/updates" in Twitter.

jtwilkins started following the problem "Missing Twitters/updates" in Twitter.

jtwilkins replied on February 07, 2008 13:58 to the question "Should Hubdub insiders who settle questions be allowed to make predictions?" in Hubdub:

No voting on Predictions by staff period. As fun as it might be this is your job and it is unethical to judge and to play the game.

jtwilkins marked one of cancelledbysbc's replies in Hubdub as useful. cancelledbysbc replied to the question "Should Hubdub insiders who settle questions be allowed to make predictions?".

jtwilkins started following the problem "Incorrectly stating "You do not have sufficient credit to take this position. Please select a smaller value." while having $H1" in Hubdub.

jtwilkins replied on February 07, 2008 13:52 to the idea "Are 24 Hour markets fair?" in Hubdub:

It boils down to people creating better Predictions with more clear settlement statements and descriptions. Until that happens moderators need to step in and edit these Predictions and/or suspend/reject unclear Predictions.

jtwilkins replied on February 07, 2008 13:47 to the question "How should primary/caucus 2008 election markets be answered (Politics)?" in Hubdub:

It depends on how the questions are worded. A lot of the problem comes form estimated superdelegates. Superdelegates are just party members who get a delegate vote at the party's convention towards the nomination. Superdelegates can flip flop there vote all the way up to the convention and they do not have to reveal there vote. So hundreds of votes are just speculation at this point.
You would have to look at how a question was worded to include these estimated superdelegates or not.