Chris Liscio's dashboard

A comment on the question "Fun app. but can't upgrade" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Charles, please ensure that (a) you're using copy/paste to enter the name/license key, and (b) you clear out those text fields before you paste the information in. Please email support@tapedeckapp.com if you're still having trouble—thanks! – Chris Liscio, on November 05, 2009 21:06

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "E-mailing FuzzMeasure Files" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio replied on November 05, 2009 14:38 to the question "E-mailing FuzzMeasure Files" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Sure—in the Finder, you can just right-click a file, and choose 'Compress "MyFile.fume3"' from the popup menu. That'll create a .zip archive you can email to your colleague.

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "compare with wiretap studio?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio replied on November 03, 2009 23:11 to the question "compare with wiretap studio?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Download the trial, and check it out. The application really sells itself. :)

The biggest feature of TapeDeck is its simplicity. It's a familiar interface, and you're always a single click away from making a new recording. Lots of folks buy it based on that reason alone—the rest is just gravy.

Chris Liscio replied on October 31, 2009 18:06 to the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

My company-wide policy is generally that only major versions are paid upgrades, with some "slop factor" thrown in to make exceptions for folks that purchased just before a major version ships.

Major versions are x.0 releases, minor are x.1, x.2, and maintenance are x.1.1, x.1.2, ...just to clear up any potential confusion.

So, in short, yes—if you buy TapeDeck 1.2 (and if you bought TapeDeck 1.0), you're getting 1.3 for free.

Chris Liscio replied on October 30, 2009 13:51 to the question "In the name of the lord how do i display my results as a 3D waterfall????" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Because I cannot know the voltage level of all the sound cards on the market (as they do not always report this value, and when they do I don't necessarily trust it), I cannot do such calibrations given only the mV/dB rating of a microphone.

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "In the name of the lord how do i display my results as a 3D waterfall????" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio replied on October 29, 2009 13:51 to the question "In the name of the lord how do i display my results as a 3D waterfall????" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Chris,

You have to ensure that the analysis in the main window is long enough to contain the duration of data that you wish to analyze in the waterfall window.

What that means, is that when you set an analysis window that only contains 100ms of data in the main FuzzMeasure window, asking for 1000ms or 2000ms of waterfall could potentially only create 1 slice (or maybe 2-3).

You can adjust the analysis window by dragging the edges of the shaded region to increase its duration. Alternatively, in the inspector, you can adjust the window start/end/duration manually.

Hope this helps.

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "Cross·Spectrum calibrated Behringer ECM8000 microphones" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio replied on October 27, 2009 17:17 to the question "Cross·Spectrum calibrated Behringer ECM8000 microphones" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Yes, this would work well. The data doesn't copy/paste into a text file perfectly (you have to massage it a bit to get the right line-endings), but it's sufficient data for the correction.

Chris Liscio replied on October 26, 2009 21:15 to the question "FRD export appears to double frequency of SPL data" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

John, can you let me know if you have a Frequency Range set on this measurement?

That is, in the inspector, expand the 'Frequency Range' area, and set both values to 0. Export again, and let me know if the values are correct.

You might have inadvertantly set a frequency range by measuring with a sweep that's limited to 20-20000Hz (rather than the default of 1Hz to nyquist).

Chris Liscio replied on October 23, 2009 17:54 to the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

For anyone that's still following this question, you'll be glad to hear that raw recordings are the main addition for 1.3. If you want a sneak peak at what we have so far, please see my post about the beta for instructions on signing up:

http://www.supermegaultragroovy.com/b...

Further details will be appearing shortly.

Chris Liscio replied on October 15, 2009 13:45 to the question "Frequency response calibration to an existing measure..." in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

If you can repro that, please gather the crash log (from ~/Library/Logs/CrashReporter) and the FRD file you exported so I can check that out—it should never crash.

Chris Liscio replied on October 15, 2009 12:26 to the question "Frequency response calibration to an existing measure..." in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Have you tried exporting your reference measurement as an FRD file, and then importing that as a microphone calibration file? Does that give you reasonable results?

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "Using waterfall for driver measurement" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio replied on October 15, 2009 12:25 to the question "Using waterfall for driver measurement" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Certainly!

Just gate the measurement in the main window by dragging the analysis window region (the grayed out area) to remove the room reflection. Then, analyze as you wish in the waterfall plugin.

A comment on the question "Frequency response calibration to an existing measure..." in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

When you created this, you used the multi-select mode to create these graphs, and then copied/pasted them into a graphics app to combine them? – Chris Liscio, on October 12, 2009 23:38

A comment on the question "Frequency response calibration to an existing measure..." in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Email support@supermegaultragroovy.com, and I'll send you a key to extend your trial.

Those menu items are grayed out because they will create more records than the document will allow (2 is the maximum past your trial period). That's one method to do the correction—with the frequency-domain combine.

The other method is to export the response as an FRD file, and then import it using the microphone calibration feature.

I think that the frequency-domain combination might provide a better result, but calibrating using the microphone calibration method I listed above would certainly be more convenient. – Chris Liscio, on October 12, 2009 12:51

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "Interchangeability to Snow Leopard" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy