Chris Liscio's dashboard

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "Cross·Spectrum calibrated Behringer ECM8000 microphones" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio replied on October 27, 2009 17:17 to the question "Cross·Spectrum calibrated Behringer ECM8000 microphones" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Yes, this would work well. The data doesn't copy/paste into a text file perfectly (you have to massage it a bit to get the right line-endings), but it's sufficient data for the correction.

Chris Liscio replied on October 26, 2009 21:15 to the question "FRD export appears to double frequency of SPL data" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

John, can you let me know if you have a Frequency Range set on this measurement?

That is, in the inspector, expand the 'Frequency Range' area, and set both values to 0. Export again, and let me know if the values are correct.

You might have inadvertantly set a frequency range by measuring with a sweep that's limited to 20-20000Hz (rather than the default of 1Hz to nyquist).

Chris Liscio replied on October 23, 2009 17:54 to the question "how about a HIGHER quality? Broadcast Wave?" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

For anyone that's still following this question, you'll be glad to hear that raw recordings are the main addition for 1.3. If you want a sneak peak at what we have so far, please see my post about the beta for instructions on signing up:

http://www.supermegaultragroovy.com/b...

Further details will be appearing shortly.

Chris Liscio replied on October 15, 2009 13:45 to the question "Frequency response calibration to an existing measure..." in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

If you can repro that, please gather the crash log (from ~/Library/Logs/CrashReporter) and the FRD file you exported so I can check that out—it should never crash.

Chris Liscio replied on October 15, 2009 12:26 to the question "Frequency response calibration to an existing measure..." in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Have you tried exporting your reference measurement as an FRD file, and then importing that as a microphone calibration file? Does that give you reasonable results?

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "Using waterfall for driver measurement" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio replied on October 15, 2009 12:25 to the question "Using waterfall for driver measurement" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Certainly!

Just gate the measurement in the main window by dragging the analysis window region (the grayed out area) to remove the room reflection. Then, analyze as you wish in the waterfall plugin.

A comment on the question "Frequency response calibration to an existing measure..." in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

When you created this, you used the multi-select mode to create these graphs, and then copied/pasted them into a graphics app to combine them? – Chris Liscio, on October 12, 2009 23:38

A comment on the question "Frequency response calibration to an existing measure..." in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Email support@supermegaultragroovy.com, and I'll send you a key to extend your trial.

Those menu items are grayed out because they will create more records than the document will allow (2 is the maximum past your trial period). That's one method to do the correction—with the frequency-domain combine.

The other method is to export the response as an FRD file, and then import it using the microphone calibration feature.

I think that the frequency-domain combination might provide a better result, but calibrating using the microphone calibration method I listed above would certainly be more convenient. – Chris Liscio, on October 12, 2009 12:51

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "Interchangeability to Snow Leopard" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio replied on September 30, 2009 14:31 to the problem "waterfall PlugIn is not working" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

As long as you have a selection in the main UI, that record has a sensible graph there, and the waterfall parameters all make some kind of sense, it should work fine.

Could you attach a screenshot?

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "Tape Deck Application Hangs on MacBook Pro" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "Just doesn't seem to record" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio set one of Chris Liscio's replies as an official response to "Can't title tapes" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy

Chris Liscio replied on September 30, 2009 14:16 to the problem "Can't title tapes" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

This was fixed in TapeDeck 1.2. Get it from http://tapedeckapp.com.

Chris Liscio replied on September 30, 2009 10:19 to the problem "Just doesn't seem to record" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

What audio hardware do you have? Are you using the built-in audio input on your Mac? What items do you have in your audio input list, and what have you selected?

Chris Liscio replied on September 28, 2009 14:45 to the problem "Tape Deck Application Hangs on MacBook Pro" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Did TapeDeck hang the instant after you entered the license key, or on the next launch?

If TapeDeck is ever hanging on launch, you should check your ~/Music/Library folder for large files (we're talking a few hundred megabytes, or gigabytes).

There appears to be a strange situation where a bad (and huge) tape is getting created by TapeDeck, and it really causes serious trouble at launch time.

Chris Liscio replied on September 28, 2009 05:11 to the question "FuzzMeasure Pro3 Key question" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

Yes! This is an acceptable use of the license.

Chris Liscio replied on September 25, 2009 10:16 to the question "measurements different everytime" in SuperMegaUltraGroovy:

The mix knob should always be turned to computer. Never, ever set it to preamp.

How do the graphs differ between correction enabled and correction disabled?