Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
A comment on the question "What is Twitter's stance toward abuse?" in Twitter:
"Twitter is not a judge for resolving disputes over most content issues—our focus is on service."
Then you need to rewrite your terms of service, which presently outlaw "abuse and harassment". – charlesarthur, on September 01, 2008 21:44
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
I agree, Noah is a good person, just opinionated not a follower – warrior, on July 18, 2008 01:56
Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis replied on July 18, 2008 01:44 to the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
BlabberMouth says I'm not allowed to be rude? How does one define rude? I'm not sure I have ever heard of a legal standard of rude. Fact is that I was promised free expression by the administration of twitter. There was no terms and conditions clarified that made RSS feeds illegal on twitter. When twitter changed their own rules and then attempted to arbitrarily disable me I still abided by the new rule even if it had not existed before. It would seem this really gets into the essence of free expression. I have been denied that right that all Americans get. I was promised better by the administration here at twitter... I would not be complaining if it were not for the fact that @Jack had promised something different.
I would not of come to twitter in the first place if I knew that there was a chaperone arbitrarily deciding regulations based on the hysteria of a few people who wanted to endanger the troops and got paranoid about their own actions. Twitter profiles are public html. Retweeting information is a form of standard community behavior here that most users enjoy. Why should I be denied what every other person on twitter has? If twitter feels that steaming information into twitter is bad then they should of clarified their position before censoring and destroying my free expression. What you are telling me is because you do not like my opinions that my rights should be denied. This is the essence of why I feel I have been discriminated against.
Igor The Troll replied on July 17, 2008 13:47 to the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
There is no such thing as free. Every network, free or by fee has responsibility to its customers which are its users. How the network monetarizes itself is irrelevant to the customers!
If and when in the future Twitter sales itself to the highest bidder will it share the proceeds with its users or will it keep all the funds? Nothing is free!
Twitters employees have no right to disclose the privacy of its users like it has done here in the public forum! Twitter and its users have a private contract that needs to be respected and honored in privacy, not to have other users decide as to which user should participate on the network and which should not. This is discrimination.
You may not like Noah, agree with him, but this is not relevant with respect to his contract with Twitter.
Twitter representatives should not be in the business to take sides in a dispute between users.
BlabberMouth replied on July 17, 2008 13:33 to the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
Geez. Noah is extremely rude to the family members and friends of military personnel who then call him on it when he crosses the line of what they consider to be acceptable behavior. He gets penalized on a free social networking site who decide he's being unacceptable in his interactions with other users and then when someone calls him, and I guess you, on it, you start whining. To see this a constitutional issue is laughable. Noah is free to create his on app and network and say all kinds of nutty things to the few people who will choose to listen.
Igor The Troll replied on July 17, 2008 13:12 to the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
I did not come here to have someone tell me to, "Now get back on your meds." I hope you do not speak on behalf of Twitter Inc.
I hope an Official Twitter representative can address my concern. There is enough flaming and abuse on Twitter among all users. While I understand it is the culture on Twitter can we be professional here?
If Twitter official representative is not interested in discussing the restoration of @noahdavidsimon Twitter account I advice Noah to hire a lawyer and sue Twitter for defamation! His name should have never been libeled by Twitter employees in a public forum as Get Satisfaction!
This should have been addressed privately with proper explanation and respect by a Twitter representative. If the question of having multiple Twitter accounts is against Twitter TOS it should be noted in TOS and such accounts can be terminated, but terminating the original account is selective censorship and prejudice in violation of consumer rights to non-discrimination based on any factors covered under the USA Bill of Rights, one being Freedom of Speech!
Anyway, it is up to Noah to proceed as he thinks is best, but please all use respective language here and do not discriminate and abuse people who came to GS to speak to Twitter Inc.
Noah, please do not post your art work here, if you want Twitter people to address your concern. There is relevancy in comments to the appropriate venue!
Thank you,
Igor
BlabberMouth replied on July 17, 2008 12:09 to the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis replied on July 17, 2008 11:09 to the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
This is the ugly side of the AntiZion Stalinist State of Twitter. Let us call a SPADE a SPADE. Censorship! The Hippie Commune is nothing but a walled community of bigots hiding behind ideals. I spoke out and they tried to shoot the messenger. The idealism here is nothing but a Chris Brogan pipe dream to sell products to blue state snobs. When a true speaker speaks... you CENSOR.
The question is if I broke the terms and conditions? The ANSWER is NO! When I built @Panopticons there was no limitation detailed against what I was doing.

Now months later twitter has arbitrarily destroyed my accounts. I'm not satisfied and neither should anyone else. twitter is dying and people are leaving in droves. The fail whale has very little to do with this. People are disillusioned with this company's agenda. At one time twitter reflected the desires of people who wanted a better form of social network. Instead what we are confronted with is the ugliest tyranny of an infrastructure ever put together. All the tech fixes in the world will not fix people's lost dreams.
Igor The Troll replied on July 17, 2008 04:57 to the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
Ok Noah, I think @noahdavidsimon is partially restored and you can send messages via Twitter! Still people cannot see the profile and your public timeline page! I hope this can be restored soon!
Thank you Twitter team for trying to clear this mess up!
Noah the points that you are raising about MailOurMilitary aka eMoms are valid and need to be examined! Also the PR firms involvement in this venture are troublesome!
I can see red flags all over the place when it concerns national security!
Is this organization a registered non for profit sanctioned by the USA government to do this type of work! Is there a security clearance and military oversight?
Noah you are not alone here! I have asked Social Media, SEO, and other Internet industry professional leaders to look into this!
If this company is running some sort of spoof, it will be exposed! If it is just being naive and unprofessional it needs to organize itself better and address the raised concerns by the public.
Let's all of us try to clear the situation up here! Noah is not Evil. His intentions are valid and good!
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
it is easier to circumvent a block if my account is gone. this isn't about right and wrong Igor. This is a vengeance by censorship. They have shown their true colors... blue with tyranny – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on July 17, 2008 02:32
Igor The Troll replied on July 16, 2008 05:48 to the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
Jason, from my experience with Noah he is a nice guy! He does go extreme on some issues, but many of us in Social Media do! We all have people we agree with and people we disagree with. Many Social Media people Flame each other to be popular and to get followers! Sometimes it gets nasty!
As you said it is not Twitter job to determine who is right and who is wrong! If it becomes so, Twitter will have problems of transparency in Social Media networks!
While I understand your concern about different Twitter account being used to circumvent a block, would it be possible to have Noah keep his original account? @noahdavidsimon I think if we can come to such a compromise it would be fair to everybody!
What do you think?
Thank you,
Igor
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
yeah thanks a lot !@#hole. they closed em down and they weren't part of panopticons. in fact actingschool was my father's account. u people are so stupid – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 21, 2008 00:40
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
but it was exciting to harass me for a few weeks now wasn't it? – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 21, 2008 00:39
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
equal-opportunity stalker? no really I swear I prefer women. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 21, 2008 00:38
A comment on the question "What is Twitter's stance toward abuse?" in Twitter:
Noah, Noah, Noah.
I'm so not sure what you're trying to do here.
Is calling me names - unwarranted ones at that - going to fix whatever YOU see at the problem?
In my experience - that never achieved any goal other than to piss off those who cared about your opinion of them.
I don't know you from Adam - you are, often times, annoying - but intentionally. I just have yet to figure out what you think will result from that behavior... If there's anyone who has been employing "NazI" tactics, I'm afraid that would be you. I've done nothing to you whatsoever, yet you are now attacking me.
That's not only bizarre, it's useless.
And I'm not at all hysterical - you're a pale shadow of those who used to troll Usenet threatening others with doom and despair regularly...
And yes, I'm sure you'll be "upping" your efforts due to the fact that I pointed that out.
Sadly, I'm afraid you have nothing better to do. – GeekMommy, on May 18, 2008 20:47
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
why Panopticons was created - the modern twitter panopticon of pure transparency has been exposed
http://simonstudiotheatre.blogspot.co...
I just want to remind twitter that Panopticons was created not to be a nuisance, but rather to remind the community that the transparent architecture of twitter with obvious security pratfalls is no place to solicit support, councilors and so called "advice givers" for our military. EMail our Military claims to screen applicants, but I found them soliciting council in the most hostile on neighborhoods on twitter. Besides the fact that most of the population online is very against the war like Reverend Wright and sympathetic to terrorist action, I'm also concerned as to the mental health of soldiers in the military dealing with such complexities when mere day to day survival are of issue. It is a great irony that twitter deleted Panopticons for architectural in-fractures! Panopticons exposed twitter for hypocrisy and the only reason it was disabled was to censure, which is what twitter should of been doing from the get go with Email our Military. The American prison systems of the late 18th and 19th centuries utilised the notion of the Panopticon - Jeremy Bentham's design that allowed all prisoners to see each other (pan, all; optic, see/observe) and therefore reduce the duty and necessity of prison guards.The original panopticon got the prisoners to work menial jobs whilst all in each other's sight lines, therefore turning the watched and the watchers into one.
The modern twitter panopticon of pure transparency has been exposed. The twitter transparency is only transparent when @Jack wants it to be, and it is very obvious that twitter wants the safety of American youth serving in Iraq to be transparent. There is no doubt that twitter is very hostile to male culture, what better way to surveillance what twitter fears more then anything else? Of course twitter is attempting to hide behind transparency. Of course twitter will claim there in no censorship! That is what a Panopticons is all about. Even facebook has some opaque elements, but twitter is just pure tyranny because what is opaque is arbitrary and dependent on pretensions. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 18, 2008 11:52
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
and I'm airing my disapproval too. your a hypocrite and always were. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:17
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
do us a favor and leave. till then I love your RSS in friendfeed. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:16
A comment on the question "Is @panopticons abusing the Terms of Service" in Twitter:
YOU LOSE TINDLE... the logic is barking at you. Even people who don't agree with my tactics think you are wrong. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:16
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...
