Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
Deelkar replied on September 15, 2008 08:54 to the problem ""Locally Stored Data" figure is not increasing" in Wuala:
A comment on the problem ""Locally Stored Data" figure is not increasing" in Wuala:
This is done/checked server-side... I fear you'll have to wait till it's fixed (again). – Bugreport, on September 14, 2008 17:40
vaus replied on September 14, 2008 15:34 to the problem ""Locally Stored Data" figure is not increasing" in Wuala:
-
karmabreath started following the question "File system integration doesn’t work" in Wuala.
-
sliep started following the question "File system integration doesn’t work" in Wuala.
Rocket replied on August 28, 2008 15:52 to the question "File system integration doesn’t work" in Wuala:
file integration always worked for me and i could stream videos, now ( i think after a winxp update) it suddently stopped working :(
Debug log initialized
Starting server CIFS ...
[SMB] CIFS Server Wua21047 starting
[SMB] Version 4.0.0
[SMB] Java VM 10.0-b23
[SMB] OS Windows XP, version 5.1
[SMB] Using authenticator org.alfresco.jlan.server.auth.DefaultAuthenticator, mode=USER
[SMB] Server timezone offset = 0hrs
[SMB] Dialects enabled = [Core,CorePlus,DOS LANMAN 1.0,LANMAN1.0,DOS LANMAN 2.1,LM1.2X002,LANMAN2.1,NT LM 0.12]
[SMB] Shares:
[SMB] [La,DISK,,[null]] [null]
[SMB] Added NTServer flag to host announcement
[SMB] Win32 NetBIOS Available LANAs: 3
[SMB] Win32 NetBIOS server Wua21047)
[SMB] Win32 NetBIOS created session handler on LANA 3
[SMB] Waiting for Win32 NetBIOS session request (Winsock) ...
[SMB] Win32 NetBIOS register listener for LANA 3
Trying to mount \\Wua21047\La
java.io.IOException: Systemfehler 53 aufgetreten.
Der Netzwerkpfad wurde nicht gefunden.
, dir=null, command=net use \\Wua21047\La "" /USER: , retVal=2
at com.wuala.common.tools.e.execute(Z:31)
at com.wuala.jlan.JLanActivator.tryConnect(Z:112)
at com.wuala.jlan.JLanActivator.run(Z:98)
Trying to mount \\Wua21047\La
java.io.IOException: Systemfehler 53 aufgetreten.
Der Netzwerkpfad wurde nicht gefunden.
, dir=null, command=net use \\Wua21047\La "" /USER: , retVal=2
at com.wuala.common.tools.e.execute(Z:31)
at com.wuala.jlan.JLanActivator.tryConnect(Z:112)
at com.wuala.jlan.JLanActivator.run(Z:98)
Trying to mount \\Wua21047\La
any suggestions? thanks alot !!
Deathbob replied on August 27, 2008 17:58 to the question "Wuala is eating my memory!?" in Wuala:
joe12 replied on August 27, 2008 15:36 to the question "Wuala is eating my memory!?" in Wuala:
Roger replied on August 27, 2008 08:35 to the question "Wuala is eating my memory!?" in Wuala:
TNT replied on August 26, 2008 15:26 to the question "Wuala is eating my memory!?" in Wuala:
Bugreport replied on June 24, 2008 17:25 to the discussion "More storage in total" in Wuala:
lukas.v replied on June 24, 2008 06:34 to the discussion "More storage in total" in Wuala:
vaus replied on June 23, 2008 21:35 to the problem ""Locally Stored Data" figure is not increasing" in Wuala:
nickname replied on June 23, 2008 18:13 to the discussion "More storage in total" in Wuala:
underlines replied on June 23, 2008 17:44 to the discussion "More storage in total" in Wuala:
lukas.v started a conversation in Wuala on June 22, 2008 08:43:
More storage in totalFrom wuala website: "The idea behind Wuala is not to give you more storage in total...". I'am a little bit disappointed because I expected some "space bonus". If I remember well, in former versions the formula for calculation of earned space was OnlineTime * LocalSpace * 10.
Luzius replied on June 20, 2008 07:09 to the question "Wuala is eating my memory!?" in Wuala:
That's a fundamental problem with Java's memory model. If you want this to be fixed, you can go to
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_...
register and vote for this bug. However, don't expect too much. Some bugs on bugs.sun.com are ten years old and still not fixed. :)
Here are the technical details:
Java applications (like Wuala) never return memory to the operating system. So if Wuala just uses 200 MB once for a second to scale a large image, memory consumption as shown in the task manager will stay at that level. So Wuala might use just 30MB after that operation but Java keeps the 200MB allocated. Sun argues that this doesn't hurt because the operating system will page out the unused 170MB to the hard disk if more memory is needed, thus freeing up the physical memory for other applications. So the 200MB consumption displayed in the Windows Task Manager makes Wuala's memory consumption look much worse than it actually is. :(
I will add a memory meter to the about box with the next update, so it will be possible to see how much memory Wuala is 'actually' using.
(Btw: sometimes memory consumption might go down a little, that's because of memory allocated and freed up by native code that isn't using Java memory.)
lukas.v replied on June 19, 2008 17:44 to the question "Wuala is eating my memory!?" in Wuala:
-
lukas.v started following the idea "upload traffic measurement for traded storage" in Wuala.
Roger replied on May 21, 2008 15:09 to the idea "Feature request: lock workspace automatically" in Wuala:
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...







