Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
A comment on the question "When the conversation stops - Facebooks indifference to people who aren't Robert Scoble" in Facebook:
it took about a week and a half/ eventually got email from them which didnt explain the exact reasons for ban (just usual comments about breaking guidelines which aren't stated) and incredibly after not telling me the reason for ban they said don't do it again or we'll ban you again (or words to that effect)! – Mike Ashworth, on November 09, 2008 18:58
mikeashworth replied on September 16, 2008 11:53 to the question "UK Skypein and 3rd party providers of geographic phone numbers" in Skype:
mikeashworth replied on September 15, 2008 16:34 to the question "UK Skypein and 3rd party providers of geographic phone numbers" in Skype:
Hi Dmitri, Thanks for your message here on get satisfaction.
I am still somewhat amazed that i never received an official response to the above question when I contacted Skype twice in the last 2 months, wanting to give them money (after the question I had asked being answered to my satisfaction).
My reservoir of goodwill towards Skype has been depleted to the point where I think you are going to have to offer some sort of reassurances that I will receive great service after I have entered into a relationship with them.
Mike
mikeashworth asked a question in Skype on August 19, 2008 17:39:
UK Skypein and 3rd party providers of geographic phone numbersI love Skype for free calls however can anyone tell me why they dont want my money for the skypein service? I have emailed them twice in the last month asking them a question about the Skypein service in the UK. and received no response at all
Sometime ago in the UK people who had signed up for skypein and were given a geographic phone number had these numbers pulled as the 3rd party skype bought them off stopped playing ball with them. You can imagine the impact of that to a small business.
I wanted to find out of the problem above could occur again, no response, therefore my perception is that this problem can still occur again
mikeashworth replied on May 31, 2008 09:43 to the question "When the conversation stops - Facebooks indifference to people who aren't Robert Scoble" in Facebook:
mikeashworth asked a question in Facebook on May 28, 2008 11:15:
When the conversation stops - Facebooks indifference to people who aren't Robert ScobleIn the November 2007 issue of Fast company, Mark Zuckerberg was quoted as saying "Facebook users are more engaged with each other. Aren't you more likely to be interested in what your friends are doing".
Nice sentiment, however the reality is that if you are too engaged with your friends then your Account will be disabled.
Why do they claim to be a social network tool, yet when you network with others they ban you.
I received an email on 27th may to warn me that i'd been misusing their service and that misuse "may" result in your account being disabled.
I was sending a number of messages to friends etc which breached a threshold (I couldn't find what this threshold was). sure I saw a pop-up advising that I was sending a lot of messages to friends however it didn't indicate any limits etc that i'd broken or how many more messages I could safely send.
I attempted to use my account again and it's been disabled. From warning to disabled in one fell swoop.
I wasn't spamming people I was batting messages backwards and forwards with people I know, discussing things, you know social stuff.
Can I get a response to my emails sent to warning@facebook.com or press@facebook.com or privacy@facebook.com or info@facebook.com ? No replies from a single person within their Company.
There are two sets of users as seen by Facebook. Their are the likes of Robert Scoble and their is everyone else. Robert Scoble aka scobleizer ran an automated script against the Facebook databases to retrieve data about his friends. This was a blatant breach of their terms of use and he was banned immediately. His account was re-instated pretty quickly after her created a real stink in the blogosphere and across the Net about his treatment at the hands of Facebook. It seems a bit unfair doesn't it that the ordinary person who wants to use Facebook is penalised for not being as well connected as Robert.
I have checked the terms of use and conduct pages and have found absolutely nothing which would indicate that conducting regular conversations with my friends etc. will result in accounts being disabled.
Why would a Company have a feature that they want you to use and then not tell me exactly what those limits are?
I feel that more and more people who use Facebook will become inactive or passive users of the site because of the issues I have described.
Would they rather people moved social conversations away from facebook and left it to people to throw sheep at each other instead?
mikeashworth replied on May 21, 2008 15:40 to the question "email notifcation for followers not working" in Twitter:
mikeashworth asked a question in Twitter on May 20, 2008 15:22:
email notifcation for followers not workingi am not receiving email notification of people following me.
mikeashworth reported a problem in Twitter on March 25, 2008 11:04:
twitter not updating facebook statuswhen i update in twitter this is not passing through to a facebook status update although it was working yesterday :-(
mikeashworth asked a question in Twitter on December 27, 2007 17:32:
Loading Profile...

