mokrates's dashboard

frumble replied on August 17, 2008 10:26 to the question "Instead of NFS, why not use FUSE on linux?" in Wuala:

And on Haiku for the forthcoming version. ;)
http://www.haiku-os.org/

3247 replied on August 17, 2008 10:22 to the question "Instead of NFS, why not use FUSE on linux?" in Wuala:

Don't forget MacFUSE on MacOS X.

Roger replied on May 21, 2008 09:09 to the idea "Chatoption zusälich zu skype?" in Wuala:

Wir überlegen uns immer wieder wie wir dem Bedürfnis von einem integrierten Chat/Forum besser nachkommen könnten. Leider fehlen uns momentan die Ressourcen hier etwas neues, eigenes zu implementieren.

Der nächste Schritt wird eine Erweiterung des User Profiles mit zusätzlichen Kontaktdaten sein (siehe dazu auch Ideas in der Wuala Gruppe). Dies würde dann zu zusätzlichen Kontaktoptionen beim Benutzer führen (denke da steht Jabber in der Pole-Position).

Für Gruppen stellen wir uns einen Group Chat vor (sowas http://www.skype.com/allfeatures/grou..., aber eben nicht Skype und vorallem besser ;)) sowie die bewährten Kommentare. Bessere Ideen dazu sind natürlich jederzeit willkommen.

Deelkar replied on May 14, 2008 12:11 to the idea "Chatoption zusälich zu skype?" in Wuala:

Ausserdem ist es unmöglich, skype einzutragen, wenn skype nicht auf demselben Rechner installiert ist, was bei mir sicherlich nie der Fall sein wird. Für Skype gibt es dedicated Hardware. Fertig.

A comment on the idea "Chatoption zusälich zu skype?" in Wuala:

Was fuer ein Bloedsinn. GoogleTalk _ist_ jabber. ICQ benutzt auch bald jabber als uebertragungsprotokoll (ist nur noch ein Frage der Zeit)... Mittlerweile kannst Du ueber freie Jabber-Server mehr Leute erreichen, als mit allen anderen. (Abgesehen vielleicht von MSN). – mokrates, on May 14, 2008 09:03

mokrates replied on May 14, 2008 08:59 to the idea "Chatoption zusälich zu skype?" in Wuala:

Ich frag mich, warum ueberhaupt skype. Warum nicht [im dienst] [im adresse]?
Und wenn ihr die Integration fuer unschoen haltet, warum ist sie dann (und dann auch noch fuer skype) drin?
Ich wills nicht fuer skype, aber ich wills fuer jabber. Noch besser waere einfach ein freeformfeld fuer eine beliebige IM-Adresse

A comment on the question "Instead of NFS, why not use FUSE on linux?" in Wuala:

@ mokrates: Well I found this one too a while ago but it works similar to Wuala, it creates a network share for your filesystems and tries to mount FUSE systems there... If you want to use a filesystem then you have to code something for yourself in C# to get it working - not really a good idea for a typical Windows user and this would just outsource the filesystem integreation problems to "SUCHWERK".

A true FUSE port for Windows would be something great and maybe Caleido could do this too but I think they are more concerned about Wuala + the beta... maybe Wuala 1.1 can have FUSE support on all platforms instead of that buggy 3rd party library they are currently using... – Bugreport, on April 29, 2008 15:48

A comment on the question "Instead of NFS, why not use FUSE on linux?" in Wuala:

Something I'd like to see is a straightforward SMB-to-FUSE translation layer; this would probably do fairly well for Wuala, but would also be useful for all FUSE-based applications. But I'm not sure if there are "impedance mismatches" between the SMB protocol and FUSE API that would complicate this. It would probably also be significantly easier to do, because it does not require any Windows kernel programming. But oh well, I'm just day dreaming. – intgr, on April 29, 2008 12:59

A comment on the question "Instead of NFS, why not use FUSE on linux?" in Wuala:

http://www.suchwerk.net/sodcms_FUSE_f... is listed on fuse.sf.net, but i have to admit, this looks not like something the wuala crew would want to use. The alternative would be to implement the fuse thing for unices and nfs for windows, which wouldn't be so nice either, because of two source trees to maintain.
Let's see what you make of it ;) – mokrates, on April 29, 2008 11:43

A comment on the question "Instead of NFS, why not use FUSE on linux?" in Wuala:

Please give me a link to a FUSE implementation for Windows... – Bugreport, on April 26, 2008 19:38

A comment on the question "Instead of NFS, why not use FUSE on linux?" in Wuala:

I don't think nfs is more common. If someone has nfs installed on his home-computer, half of the time there is probably an nfs-server too, and then wuala doesn't mount either.
fuse ist stable, fuse runs under windows, there is a java-binding for fuse (FUSE-J) fuse is in every 2.6.X kernel, use fuse! nfs is old and you don't want networking, you want a Filesystem supplied by a USErspace application. ;) (please?) – mokrates, on April 26, 2008 02:34

mokrates started following the question "Instead of NFS, why not use FUSE on linux?" in Wuala.