mork's dashboard

mork started following the idea "Hubdub's gray "favicon" is too inconspicuous" in Hubdub.

mork replied on June 26, 2008 21:32 to the discussion "Wall Street Journal says, "‘Pundit Watch’ May Need Its Own Watchdog"" in Hubdub:

Very interesting.

This pundit watch thing has enlightened me as to how reluctant they are to state a firm prediction.

I hope more pundits or public figure whose opinion is respected in media embrace the opportunity to maintain an account as Hollywood blogger Nikki Finke has.

Although the article has valid points regarding their comments being interpreted into direct predictions Nigel's defense is legitimate.

In my opinion the solution is for pundits to manage their own accounts on www.hubdub.com.

I would very much welcome their involvement.

mork replied on June 20, 2008 00:37 to the question "How do I "appeal" if I feel a question was settled wrong?" in Hubdub:

In my experience I have found that the 'contact us' form of hubdub always gets a response.

mork replied on June 08, 2008 23:21 to the discussion "Username editing?" in Hubdub:

I'm curious too. I have a slight cosmetic adjustment in mind.

mork marked one of Markov's replies in Hubdub as useful. Markov replied to the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?".

mork replied on June 07, 2008 14:33 to the idea "Highest Net Worth Reached??" in Hubdub:

I'd love to see something liken to a 'Google Gadget' that monitors this.
Adding the ability to superimpose the graphs of selectable friends would make it fun to monitor.

A comment on the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

You are absolutely correct AAA. The 24hr pulse of hubdub is the reason it is thriving. – mork, on June 06, 2008 02:47

mork replied on June 05, 2008 20:15 to the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

Myself, I am Really Really Proud of my Humility... j/k ;)

In all seriousness, I appreciate the contributions everyone has made to this page.

The hubdub has had a surprisingly civil community in my opinion and the comments pages are often a very good indication of how intelligent the community is as a whole.
I regret any comments I made that did not live up to a far better standard which the community has established.

I see the work the superusers are doing and think the positive impact it has had on making the site run smoother is considerable. I am actually blown away by the amount of effort everyone is putting in voluntarily. My contributions have been fractional of what the other superusers are contributing.

The Hubdub enthusiasm Lesley speaks of is alive and from watching the activities of the other super users I know it is their motivating factor. I see how much effort goes into keeping an eye on the politics and sports categories in particular. It is impressive.

I hope no-one else was offended by my regretable wording epicur speaks of. If It is you, please accept my appology now.

Sincerely ,

mork

mork marked one of Destry's replies in Hubdub as useful. Destry replied to the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?".

mork marked one of Lesley's replies in Hubdub as useful. Lesley replied to the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?". mork and 2 other people think it's one of the best replies.

mork marked one of anaverageamerican's replies in Hubdub as useful. anaverageamerican replied to the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?".

mork marked one of epicur's replies in Hubdub as useful. epicur replied to the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?". mork and 2 other people think it's one of the best replies.

A comment on the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

I find George Carlin offensive.
sorta – mork, on June 04, 2008 22:00

A comment on the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

I feel you are using overreaction in an attempt to add weight to your argument. – mork, on June 04, 2008 21:22

A comment on the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

I am ignorant of many things and have absolutely no problem admitting it. – mork, on June 04, 2008 21:19

A comment on the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

The definition of ignorant is 'not having the information' The bardot verdict was clearly split into two parts. One part fine and one part damages. Throughout the thread you were trying to convince us that the damages should be considered part of the fine. To suggest this is absurd and you clearly 'don't have the information'. – mork, on June 04, 2008 20:59

A comment on the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

Common sense' is mentioned in the hubdub guidelines and rules and this is the context. It was not a personal attack – mork, on June 04, 2008 20:54

A comment on the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

I do not have an agreement with hubdub.com and the title is that of a user. – mork, on June 04, 2008 20:47

mork replied on June 04, 2008 20:32 to the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

I have to agree with Krujis. I do not consider myself and am not a representative of Hubdub or Hubdub.com.

mork replied on June 04, 2008 20:21 to the problem "A Hubdub representative (super user Mork) not being a good role model for Hubdub?" in Hubdub:

I was out of line.
If epicur had not started that thread with "Here we go again." I probably would not have reacted the way I did.