Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
Murphy replied on July 20, 2009 16:10 to the idea "Tag music with emotions" in Songbird:
This is what I have always envisioned would be possible if a tagging system like this were made for Songbird: http://getsatisfaction.com/songbird/t...
Rather than just labeling a song with one broad genre, you could tag it with terms that describe the moods and qualities of the song. Then you could filter down to certain tags, or moods, whenever you are in the mood for them. Maybe songs could even be visually distinct to display the different moods they create.
Murphy replied on July 20, 2009 15:51 to the idea "Songbird customer service policy currently a self-fulfilling prophecy" in Songbird:
I do hope that once the really big features on the roadmap are implemented, more time can be spent on more innovative features that other players don't offer. Obviously, add-on developers can always work on making these innovative features themselves, but I think that official support is what really drives innovation in the core of the program. An example of this is the Mozilla Labs, which is a page where the Mozilla team posts more experimental add-ons that might eventually be part of Firefox and their other products, so that everyone can participate in their development. Maybe there could be a Songbird labs where the team could work on a few adventurous bird-altering experiments.-
Murphy started following the idea "Speed through songs during fast forward, don't skip through them" in Songbird.
Murphy replied on July 19, 2009 16:00 to the update "Talk to us." in Songbird:
A comment on the idea "Awesome Library Bar!" in Songbird:
Saving an image for each artist in the library would take up some space, but no more than is already taken up by having album art. After all, you most likely have a much greater number of albums in your library than artists, since each artist will generally have a few albums each.
I have 325 artists in my library, so if each image was on average 100kb, that would be 325 x 100 = 32,500kb, or 32 and a half megs. By comparison, iTunes's album art database on my computer is 233 megs. It is not that much space to sacrifice, and I think it is worth it because of the benefits of speed you get from having the images stored locally. – Murphy, on July 19, 2009 02:37
Murphy replied on July 18, 2009 21:53 to the idea "Standardized artist image database from last.fm" in Songbird:
I was just suggesting an artist image database because I actually assumed that Songbird already had an album art database. Now that you mention it though, I really don't know if it does. I know when you first turn on the grid view in iTunes, it creates thumbnails and seems to build a database of all of the art in your library, but I don't know if any of the Songbird media views that use album art perform anything similar. If not, I think there should definitely be an album art database as well.
Murphy replied on July 18, 2009 19:46 to the idea "Options to make the Filter Pane more customizable" in Songbird:
-
Murphy started following the idea "Options to make the Filter Pane more customizable" in Songbird.
A comment on the idea "Awesome Library Bar!" in Songbird:
Your question about where to store the artist images got me thinking, so I posted this topic suggesting that we make a standardized database for storing artist images so that multiple add-ons can access the images easily. I think something like that would help this dilemma. Perhaps you could have the add-on check to see if muzPhoto has created a database yet; if it has, then you can use that one, and if it hasn't, it can just create the database for the first time. – Murphy, on July 18, 2009 06:20
Murphy shared an idea in Songbird on July 18, 2009 06:07:
Standardized artist image database from last.fmWithout album art, a media view is just list of text where you have to identify items by their names. Using album art helps you visualize your library and pick out an album by a visual symbol. Though even as more media views utilize album art, artists usually still have to be listed in plain text, giving you little visual cue to distinguish one by. And the artist list can just look a little bland.
However, one great way to provide visual symbols for artists is to display unique images of each one. Last.fm has an excellent library of images for artists uploaded and voted on by users, which provides a changing, unique picture to identify each artist by. An add-on could retrieve the current top images for each artist from last.fm and use them next to artist names or in some other way to visually represent each artist. It could also refresh the collection of images after a specified period of time to change things up.
Using these artists images it not a new idea; in fact, the ♪Photo add-on already does it. The problem, however, is that the add-on needs to save the images in a database on the user's hard drive, and if other add-ons want to utilize last.fm artist images as well, they might waste space and effort by making an entire separate database. I think that we should set a standard for this database so that multiple add-ons can access it if they need to. This could make it easier for add-on developers to utilize these images for an add-on, and it would keep the images organized in one place so hard drive space isn't unnecessarily taken up.
I have thought of a few neat ways these images could be used by add-ons. ♪Photo, of course, is already a really fun example:
In the Awesome Library Bar topic, I posted this mock-up which uses an artist image in the search results to help you visually identify the artist you are searching for:
Simon, who is working on developing the add-on, mentioned some uncertainty here about where to store the images, which gave me the idea to have a standardized database that multiple add-ons could use.
I also posted a mockup here showing how artist images could be used in a simple filter list to help you distinguish artists a bit, and to spice up the interface:
Using artist images like this is something I have never seen in another music program before, and I think it could really make using Songbird unique.-
Murphy started following the idea "Podcast subscription support" in Songbird.
Murphy replied on July 17, 2009 19:46 to the idea "Songbird Bounty Centre" in Songbird:
This is a neat idea. I know that many people contribute to open source software just because they enjoy coding, improving the program, and helping a community, but maybe this would make it more exciting and encourage people to put a few more hours into it. The torrent site what.cd has a bounty system that motivates people to upload highly requested albums. The number of megabytes you have uploaded is the currency, and you can add some of your accumulated upload to a bounty for a particular album. A person who uploads that album can claim the bounty that people have contributed to. Maybe people could pool money or just some sort of points into a bounty for a feature they want to see made to encourage someone to code it.
Miro also has a neat system where you can adopt a line of code and donate money to have someone code from there: https://www.getmiro.com/adopt/
Murphy replied on July 17, 2009 17:40 to the update "Talk to us." in Songbird:
You know, when I was young, it was my dream to become a super star idea man. :D Thank you for your kindness, Laura, I love being here and I plan on sticking around.
This new GetSatisfaction design isn't too bad, it's just more difficult to see active topics on, and I get the feeling that less people will be part of discussions. Even though it is still possible to make new topics and respond in topics, they seem to be buried away now, like the time of discussing has ended, and the page is now just an archive of topics passed. I know they are still working on improving the layout though, and I have left several suggestions for improving it, so hopefully it will get better.
I'm not sure if having a forum would be better or not. On one hand, I do think it would encourage deeper discussion. It is usually easier to see new and active topics on forums, they allow you to collaborate more with people with private messaging, and I think people feel more comfortable having general discussions, because there isn't really an option for a general discussion topic on GetSatisfaction. For example, I have thought about making a topic where people could post screenshots of their Songbird, but I'm not sure how to post it; as a question thread that says "What does your Songbird look like?". I could, but I just feel like a question topic on GetSatisfaction is intended for someone who actually has a question about how to use the software.
I do, however, like how easy it is to follow topics on GetSatisfaction, show your support for an idea without posting a response, and how the conversations are non-linear (they are like Google Waves, where you can insert comments underneath other people's comments, instead of always having your post placed at the end of the thread). I don't know if there is any forum software that has these benefits, or if GetSatisfaction will ever get some of the benefits of forums, so I don't know if having one or the other is a perfect solution.-
Murphy started following the idea "Songbird Bounty Centre" in Songbird.
-
Murphy started following the idea "Properly announce the free swag for fixing bugs" in Songbird.
-
Murphy started following the idea "Automatically add Champions to Admins' contact list" in Get Satisfaction.
Murphy replied on July 16, 2009 21:14 to the idea "Create a private messaging system" in Get Satisfaction:
Murphy replied on July 16, 2009 21:09 to the idea "Replay a Topic (or "Stealing ideas from Google Wave")" in Get Satisfaction:
-
Murphy started following the idea "Replay a Topic (or "Stealing ideas from Google Wave")" in Get Satisfaction.
Murphy shared an idea in Get Satisfaction on July 16, 2009 21:05:
Move the left-side navigation menu to somewhere elseI think the pages that list topics, such as this one, would look better if the navigation menu was somewhere other than the left side. Having the menu on the left as it is now makes it so that there is a lot of blank space on that side as you scroll down the page. To me, it feels like it is more important to have content (the topics) here instead because it is easier for the eyes to find the topics at the left edge of the window than when they are indented far from the edge. I think that it would look better if the menu were on the right side, or if it were made a horizontal and placed above all of the topics. I think this would also maintain a more consistent design over all GetSatisfaction pages, since main pages such as this have topics aligned on the left of the page.
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...



