Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed-
Mo started following the idea "URL Schema for iPhone application." in Spotify.
A comment on the idea "Coda Code Collapsing" in Panic Inc:
@Zack Katz: huh? nobody was promised this feature. there are lots of things people would like and Panic would like to roll into Coda, but anybody who *bought* Coda on the basis of features which MIGHT appear in the future has only themselves to blame, really. – Mo, on August 12, 2009 13:08
A comment on the question "Is there a way to make Coda use a Webkit nightly build?" in Panic Inc:
No no, you don't need to whip anything up—the fix is just to amend the framework path in the script to force Coda's own Frameworks folder to appear before WebKit's in the list (so Coda's version of Sparkle is used instead of WebKit's). – Mo, on February 28, 2009 16:50
Mo replied on February 25, 2009 22:40 to the question "Is there a way to make Coda use a Webkit nightly build?" in Panic Inc:
Thanks for that—it nearly works, but... not quite.
Ah, it turns out that Coda and Webkit's versions of Sparkle disagree—I can think of some workarounds (maybe), but it's Coda expecting Sparkle to provide the symbol SUCheckAtStartupKey and not finding it, because Sparkle is getting loaded from within WebKit.app due to the dyld path.
Forcing Coda's own Frameworks folder to appear before WebKit.app's in DYLD_FRAMEWORK_PATH does the trick, but you need to know where Coda is for it to work.
Mo marked one of Steven Frank's replies in Panic Inc as useful. Steven Frank replied to the idea "Rethink of the Coda toolbar".
Mo replied on February 25, 2009 22:28 to the idea "Rethink of the Coda toolbar" in Panic Inc:
Mo shared an idea in Panic Inc on February 25, 2009 22:23:
Rethink of the Coda toolbarOne thing that's bugged me for as long as I've been using Coda is the toolbar. It's never entirely clear what's supposed to happen when you switch between one of the seven "modes" (five, if you don't count "sites").
Switching between "Edit" and "Preview" (for HTML) or "Edit" and "CSS" (for CSS or CSS-embedded-in-HTML) makes perfect sense. What's supposed to happen when you switch between "Edit" and "Preview" for a CSS file? What about "Edit" and "Terminal" or "Edit" and "Books"? Switching to either "Terminal" or "Books" has nothing to do with the file you're editing, really—it's all about the site overall Is there an implication that you can switch back and have preserved state? Given a tabbed interface, is it really worth being able to flip between an editor and a terminal within the same tab when you could just have them side-by-side? When you create a Terminal session and go back to a tab, is there any way to know that your session is still running in the background?
To my mind, I think it's worth splitting the six buttons into three groups (for want of a better term): global context (containing "Sites"), file mode (Edit, CSS, Preview) and "extras", which would cover Terminal and Books. For Sites, Edit, CSS and Preview, the buttons would do exactly what they do now—although there'd be a clear logical split between Sites and the others. Some sort of visual indicator that switching to Preview will actually preview the file you're editing specifically (which wouldn't apply when editing a CSS file) would be a nice touch. Option-clicking any of them would behave exactly as they do currently, except that they'd default to operating on the file you're working with, rather than a blank one: I'd be sorely tempted to relegate the current option-click behaviour to shift-option-click.
Terminal and Books would behave a little differently: if there was no Terminal or Books tab open, a new one would be created (as though you'd option-clicked by current behaviour), but if there was one open, then it would switch to it, unless you option-click. In other words, clicking causes "switch to existing, creating if necessary" whereas option-clicking is "always create".
Obviously, I can rearrange the toolbar to suit what I believe is a more logical way of thinking about the workflow, but I can't change the behaviours themselves. Don't get me wrong, I do really really like Coda, but this aspect of it bugs the hell of me :)
(The absolute ideal, of course, would be if plug-ins could add additional "file modes" and "extras" in a supported way, but I suspect that one'll be a while coming!)-
Mo started following the question "Are you using Coda and Git?" in Panic Inc.
-
Mo started following the question "Any plan concerning GIT integration ? ..." in Panic Inc.
Mo asked a question in Panic Inc on February 23, 2009 14:37:
Is there a way to make Coda use a Webkit nightly build?Like a lot of Mac-wielding web developers, I run Webkit nightlies (which are especially nice now Sparkle has been added), which includes all manner of nice things.
While it's handy to test against current release Safari, it'd be useful if there was a way to make Coda use an installed Webkit nightly instead of the system-wide Webkit installation. A preference for this would be ideal (presumably accomplished by dynamically-loading the framework when needed rather than specifying it at compile time), but a straightforward mechanism of launching Coda so that it binds to the Webkit nightly would do the job.
Mo marked one of Milen Dzhumerov's replies in The Cosmic Machine as useful. Milen Dzhumerov replied to the idea "Multiple Twitter Accounts".
Mo replied on February 21, 2009 10:35 to the idea "Posting to multiple services simultaneously" in The Cosmic Machine:
Mo marked one of Jennie's replies in The Cosmic Machine as useful. Jennie replied to the idea "Posting to multiple services simultaneously".
Bruce's reply to "Posting to multiple services simultaneously" was just promoted to the most useful! Mo and 5 other people think it's one of the best replies.
-
Mo started following the idea "Posting to multiple services simultaneously" in The Cosmic Machine.
Mo shared an idea in Panic Inc on February 21, 2009 10:28:
Filtering in the file listingIt'd be really useful if there was a way to filter the file listing (or rather, exclude things from it); either globs or regexps would be good for me—I'm not fussy.
(Background: I work on a pretty large and complex web application, and although a lot of it is Smarty templates and PHP, there's also parts written in C and bytecompiled PHP and so on; being able to ignore everything named *.lo, Makefile.in and Makefile would declutter my file listing rather a lot!)
Mo replied on February 20, 2009 17:24 to the problem "Experts Exchange uses cloaking in vioation of published policies" in Google:
I can see it in Google's cache (the link you just posted). Screenshot:
http://www.quicksnapper.com/nevali/im...
I've seen this happen often enough that it's clear that they're at least trying to cloak, even if the mechanisms aren't reliable enough for them to be able to do it all of the time.
Google regularly returns experts-exchange search results for me for terms which only appear in answers which, when I visit the page, I'm unable to see.
Mo reported a problem in Google on February 20, 2009 15:14:
Experts Exchange uses cloaking in vioation of published policiesexperts-exchange.com often ranks highly for technical queries, but it actively cloaks any answers given when you visit the page in most browsers.
To the best of my knowledge, this is a clear example of "cloaking", as the actual answer text is included in the page source for the benefit of Googlebot, and so is in violation of Google's policies.
Example screenshot: http://www.quicksnapper.com/nevali/im...-
Mo started following the idea "support identi.ca (and Laconica)" in The Cosmic Machine.
-
Mo started following the question "Better visual distinction between services in the aggregated views." in The Cosmic Machine.
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...









