Noah David Simon's dashboard

woah you were running "confession" and you didn't like my language?
hypocrisy... but thumbs up on the account. too bad you closed it down. you could of used it as a place to talk to fizz – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 24, 2008 00:13

twitter might not have the ability to be security, but if someone else records a twitter conversation that smacks of bigtry and hatred and presents it to a twitter authority before the tweets are erased. Then there should be a system of supervision. I created Panopticons to show security flaws in twitter, it was not designed for harassment. I was being harassed myself by "Leftists" for complaining about racism against Jews. I was left with little way to fight the hatred beyond making a spectacle of it. I wish twitter had a higher authority that I could of magnified my issue with. ...but there was not. As a result I had to take the vigilante route. If twitter does not correct the mistake they are making, I guarantee I will not be the last person who needs to create their own solutions. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 23, 2008 13:31

yeah thanks a lot !@#hole. they closed em down and they weren't part of panopticons. in fact actingschool was my father's account. u people are so stupid – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 21, 2008 00:40

but it was exciting to harass me for a few weeks now wasn't it? – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 21, 2008 00:39

equal-opportunity stalker? no really I swear I prefer women. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 21, 2008 00:38

http://simonstudiotheatre.blogspot.co... – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 18, 2008 12:00

why Panopticons was created - the modern twitter panopticon of pure transparency has been exposed

http://simonstudiotheatre.blogspot.co...

I just want to remind twitter that Panopticons was created not to be a nuisance, but rather to remind the community that the transparent architecture of twitter with obvious security pratfalls is no place to solicit support, councilors and so called "advice givers" for our military. EMail our Military claims to screen applicants, but I found them soliciting council in the most hostile on neighborhoods on twitter. Besides the fact that most of the population online is very against the war like Reverend Wright and sympathetic to terrorist action, I'm also concerned as to the mental health of soldiers in the military dealing with such complexities when mere day to day survival are of issue. It is a great irony that twitter deleted Panopticons for architectural in-fractures! Panopticons exposed twitter for hypocrisy and the only reason it was disabled was to censure, which is what twitter should of been doing from the get go with Email our Military. The American prison systems of the late 18th and 19th centuries utilised the notion of the Panopticon - Jeremy Bentham's design that allowed all prisoners to see each other (pan, all; optic, see/observe) and therefore reduce the duty and necessity of prison guards.The original panopticon got the prisoners to work menial jobs whilst all in each other's sight lines, therefore turning the watched and the watchers into one.
The modern twitter panopticon of pure transparency has been exposed. The twitter transparency is only transparent when @Jack wants it to be, and it is very obvious that twitter wants the safety of American youth serving in Iraq to be transparent. There is no doubt that twitter is very hostile to male culture, what better way to surveillance what twitter fears more then anything else? Of course twitter is attempting to hide behind transparency. Of course twitter will claim there in no censorship! That is what a Panopticons is all about. Even facebook has some opaque elements, but twitter is just pure tyranny because what is opaque is arbitrary and dependent on pretensions. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 18, 2008 11:52

and I'm airing my disapproval too. your a hypocrite and always were. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:17

do us a favor and leave. till then I love your RSS in friendfeed. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:16

YOU LOSE TINDLE... the logic is barking at you. Even people who don't agree with my tactics think you are wrong. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:16

and that is why I am watching your RSS from friendfeed – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:13

hey Kosso... I'm enjoying your girl's RSS in friendfeed. Well not actually... I'm lying. She frankly bores me, but I could if I wanted to. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:13

you never blocked Noah... heh heh... I love the lies – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:11

I'm going to have more fun with your RSS on friendfeed. come join the Twit-Out... we will teach twitter a thing or two about they're pretensions of free expression. See you there! – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 03:11

Get Satisfaction and Libel - WRONGFUL ACCUSATIONS

also there is a certain matter of "Get Satisfaction"'s right to allow people arbitrarily accuse me of stalking. I'd like to make the case for libel if Get Satisfaction and TWITTER want to be so arbitrary. I want to give an example of "stalking" that is going through the courts in Beverly Hills (where MySpace is based) and let me establish and elaborate why what I am doing is different. Here is the link and I will quote the article here.

L.A. files 'cyber bully' charges against Missouri mother in connection with girl's suicide

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwor...

Lori Drew is accused of creating a fraudulent MySpace persona whose comments may be linked to the teen's death.

differences are the following
(1) it is very clear that all my accounts were in fact me. Everything I did was transparent, as opposed to the actions of TWITTER that took action without informing me.

(2) I never pretended that the accounts were not me.

(3) I never got intimately involved in such a way with any of the above people that I could inflict emotional pain after impersonating another person

(4) frankly it would be a very sad thing if the woman defendant in this case above "IS" convicted. This would open the floodgates for all kinds of accusations that would put innocent people in jail.

(5) (a) if there were architectural breaches and not vile content issues, then the breaches of twitter architecture were not clearly outlined. (b) if the issue is vile speech then why did twitter let me get harangued by Palestinian sympathizers that were clearly anti-Semitic like @MarkDavidson and @QueenofSpain? Certainly @Hamas should be censored then as well.

(6) if the RSS feeds go to an imaginary friend in friendfeed, is this still stalking? Why are my actions an infraction of the architecture and not an infraction of content? – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 17, 2008 01:30

the next panopticons will be on friendfeed and will not be in conflict with what is being talked about here. I look forward to reading your tweets. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 16, 2008 22:13

next panopticons will be an imaginary friend in friendfeed that uses rss from sneak accounts on twitter. how does that break architecture on twitter? ur thoughts? and will twitter bother to delete the accounts now? the reflection will happen off twitter! – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 16, 2008 22:07

this forum is a farce.
Your company has led many to believe that you are not censoring. this implies some kind of inherent science to your methods. Censorship is your right as a part of private property. Your social network is your property, but you set a precedent for people to leave. They will, especially with all the downtime your company has had as of late. Your delusional if you think you are above some censorial duty. (The argument that you are a monopolizing government that should not censor except in threatening cases is valid, but I will not use this here for a sake of argument because the accusation of a monopoly has not been proven yet.) I expect you to censor. I also expect there to be a backlash against you if you do without reasonable doubt of physical harm. you claim I have broken the architecture, but if so then you have to disable @chrisbrogan 's account because he is the one who theorized of the possibility of "panopticons". Another slippery slope. Certainly your architecture needs to be open enough with freedoms so that people can practice free will, but if this is so then twitter needs to stop being a coward and elaborate on what architecture abuse is. (and before you delete the accounts... not afterwords! shame on you!) At a certain point you are passing judgment with discretion. just now on this page I used foul inappropriate language, but I used it in the context of the forum here. There is no consistent method to this. The fact that you think there is, is a huge problem! Yes you can delete my accounts... but this is not the end of this. The pandora box has just opened and if you do not elaborate and detail exact situations of abuse then the only person who is guilty of breaking your architecture is yourselves. Tell your buddies at twitter and co. that I am making my next campaign an education on how to build another "panopticons". Now there will not be one, but rather many. Your error will now be viral. Next time do your company a favor and include the alleged in your thought process. In courts both parties have to keep each other informed of what information is at hand. (witnesses, evidence, etc.) It is hard to take a company seriously about they're pretensions of free speech without the transparency. your no better then any other social network. you seem to think your farts smell better. We all do.
this is a comment here
http://getsatisfaction.com/twitter/to...

comments are also here:
http://simonstudiotheatre.blogspot.co...

http://simonstudiotheatre.blogspot.co...

yes it has been... because it points to some serious issues obviously. GLAD I COULD HELP! – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 16, 2008 19:14

glad I could be a part in improving your life instead of the usual lemming behavior of most people on twitter who are afraid to rock the boat. – Noah David Simon @TheAnalysis, on May 16, 2008 19:12