Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
oppugner replied on August 16, 2008 07:44 to the idea "discussion forums" in Hubdub:
oppugner shared an idea in Hubdub on August 16, 2008 06:24:
discussion forumsAre there any plans to have some general discussion forums? From time to time I find myself wanting to post comments on a question but stop as my comments are of a more general nature and not specifically related to the question at hand. I was just thinking that there would be more than a few worthwhile discussions to be had based on some of the questions that are being created.
oppugner replied on August 12, 2008 10:38 to the question "How do we encourage good question creation?" in Hubdub:
oppugner replied on August 12, 2008 10:11 to the idea "wagering on own questions" in Hubdub:
oppugner shared an idea in Hubdub on August 12, 2008 10:03:
wagering on own questionsAs a stray thought, when making a wager on your own prediction how about disabling the ability to hide that wager from your pulic predictions?
oppugner replied on February 29, 2008 21:42 to the problem "New leaderboard question settlement dispute" in Hubdub:
oppugner replied on February 23, 2008 14:19 to the question "Need help with the wording of a question" in Hubdub:
oppugner replied on February 23, 2008 13:05 to the question "A question of morality" in Hubdub:
"I don't think there can be a "line" drawn against which we can appraise the morality of all questions going forward. You could say that we can't have any questions pertaining to the possible death of a public figure. But then is predicting the death of Britney morally equivalent to predicting the death of Osama Bin Laden?"
I agree with Donal aswell. News is often full of items that many find distastefull, immoral, upsetting etc. etc. None of this means that the question itself is any less valid. (Assuming it's a properly structured question ofcourse 8:[) Morality is a very personal thing. While many people may share similiar moral standards, no two people can be assumed to have the same moral standards. What might be immoral to me may just be distastefull to someone else.
While I agree that the Hubdub creators have the right to filter questions on their site if they choose to do so I think it would be a mistake.
I also wonder if their are not really 2 questions here. The prediction on questions such as war casualties and the wagering on such questions. Perhaps there could be a way of predicting an outcome but not "profiting" from it. Maybe having an additional leaderboard where the amount of H$ is irrelevant but the number of correct predictions made is what counts.
oppugner asked a question in Hubdub on February 23, 2008 12:32:
Need help with the wording of a questionI was thinking of creating a question which basically asks "Will the US Congress allow F-22 sales to Australia".
My ignorance of the steps that would have to be taken to allow foreign sales of the F-22 is pretty high so I suspect that simply asking if sales would be "allowed" is far too vague. Does anyone have any thoughts on how the question could be phrased so as to be a bit more precise?
Thanks in advance.-
oppugner started following the idea "Display Original "Likelihood Percentages" on Question Page" in Hubdub.
oppugner replied on February 16, 2008 19:55 to the idea "suspend date countdown" in Hubdub:
oppugner shared an idea in Hubdub on February 16, 2008 11:20:
suspend date countdownWould it be possible to put a countdown next to the suspend date/time shown in the settlement details?
For example,
Suspend date: this Tuesday 11:59pm PST (3 days, 3 hours)
Math has never been my strong suit and the last thing my poor excuse for a mind needs after a long day is to continually have to do timezone calculations. Having a countdown would make things so much easier...
Loading Profile...
