plgpat's dashboard

plgpat replied on March 07, 2009 01:11 to the problem "28 Fev 2009 cause conterspy sbamsvc.exe use 100% cpu ....." in Sunbelt Software:

I don't find a solution in thunderbird thread

plgpat replied on March 07, 2009 00:59 to the problem "28 Fev 2009 cause conterspy sbamsvc.exe use 100% cpu ....." in Sunbelt Software:

I disable active protection and take a look on topic Latest version of SBAMsvc.exe uses 99% CPU with XP SP3 and Thunderbird

plgpat replied on March 07, 2009 00:54 to the problem "28 Fev 2009 cause conterspy sbamsvc.exe use 100% cpu ....." in Sunbelt Software:

in fact sbamsvc.exe use again 99% of cpu just after a thunderbird action for receive mails

plgpat replied on March 07, 2009 00:50 to the problem "28 Fev 2009 cause conterspy sbamsvc.exe use 100% cpu ....." in Sunbelt Software:

I did it and i re-install counterspy and solve the pb as you said
thank's

plgpat replied on March 06, 2009 23:32 to the problem "28 Fev 2009 cause conterspy sbamsvc.exe use 100% cpu ....." in Sunbelt Software:

yes is this process but i Uninstall counterspy and i can't re-install it sbamsvc can't start ....

plgpat reported a problem in Sunbelt Software on March 06, 2009 22:32:

28 Fev 2009 cause conterspy sbamsvc.exe use 100% cpu .....

just before this update evry things was ok ...
I try to dowload the latest version of conterspy unstall reboot re-install counterspy
It's now impossible sbramssc.exe don't start (using 100% cpu during long time) and a popup stop installation .
I have Nod32 (and i desable the active protection, no impact on installation...
anyone have an idea??

thnk's in advance patrice

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

witch files exactly? nod32 ThreatSense can exclude specific files
with threatsense ( in advanced options : tools/threatSesense advanced configuration ) – plgpat, on October 22, 2008 22:14

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

I try them thank's but in fact when I have some times I go to vipre – plgpat, on September 06, 2008 18:29

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

thje lmail reurns to me .... I said :
One year subscription on Vipre in substitution of nod32 is the proposal
Ok I accept your proposal, My Pc is to old for using two antiviral+antispy

Tank's in advance Patrice – plgpat, on August 28, 2008 17:41

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

i sent a mail – plgpat, on August 28, 2008 17:33

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

i sent a mail – plgpat, on August 28, 2008 17:32

A comment on the problem "SPF configurtation export trouble" in Sunbelt Software:

I sent mail to support that and the support said use beta version of spf ... but no impact on my trouble some other people have the same trouble ???
thnak's patrice – plgpat, on August 28, 2008 17:21

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

It's so late in france ... I think about your proposal in frensh "la nuit porte conseil" (something like night is good advisor) and come back tomorrow evening see you soon patrice – plgpat, on August 27, 2008 22:39

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

Thank's is a very smart commercial proposal .... But vipre seems very new product, can i found any independent review on net ?? I'm intrested by your proposal in this case. – plgpat, on August 27, 2008 22:25

plgpat reported a problem in Sunbelt Software on August 27, 2008 22:14:

SPF configurtation export trouble

I use the 4.6.1830 spf version and i can't export spf rules any time a have a popup with:
"error generating digest for config file" ...

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

Oups i comment last message for this one – plgpat, on August 27, 2008 22:08

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

yes that's true 100% with active conterspy protection on
80% if CS Active protection off and counterspy is doing a deep scanning. – plgpat, on August 27, 2008 22:05

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

I do that and ekn.exe (nod32 scan processs) continue (arround 80 % cpu) – plgpat, on August 27, 2008 21:57

A comment on the problem "nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?" in Sunbelt Software:

Yes i try with " disable "check files when they are opened or copied" Cpu load are not impacted.!! I turn off active couterpsy protection. but is not enough when i scan whith counter spy ekrn are not happy and use 80% off cpu ...
In fact my trouble isn't solved ...
thnk's in advance for any ideas to solve it. – plgpat, on August 27, 2008 21:48

plgpat reported a problem in Sunbelt Software on August 27, 2008 21:36:

nod32 counterspy v3 fully incompatible?

I use Nod32 antivirus version 3.0.642 and ekrn use 88 %-99% cpu during counter spy v3 scan .
for using scan i must deactivate active protection (counterpsy) in other case ekrn use 100 % cpu any time ....
what can i do i have licence for nod32 for more year and i don't want change antivrus application now ...
Nortes;
With the v2 version of counterspy nod32 functionning well .... Pb occurs after reebot needed by V3 installation!!