Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
richard abrams replied on June 08, 2009 10:55 to the question "CPU requirements for play back" in Motionbox:
richard abrams asked a question in Motionbox on June 06, 2009 00:03:
CPU requirements for play backThe embedded player for both SD and HD clips seems to really stuff on low spec PC's for example Atom netbooks.
I could play the same clips fine via youtube. Is the player; even in SD known for this? Can it be remedied.
I assume I am inserting the clips correctly. I click on "Playback Difficulties? Watch in Standard Definition" and then take the embed code from the resulting video.
To me looking at both the HD and SD embed videos the result looks very similar.
Am I missing something. Can't help but think there is another lower bit rate video or player there somewhere and I'm missing something. As it is I'm starting to look at a second site to blog videos for lesser PC's. Seems a shame to need that.
Does anyone else have the same issue?
Regards
Richard.
richard abrams replied on June 05, 2009 20:33 to the question "Motionbox. Long Term Future?" in Motionbox:
Thanks for the reply. I do feel reassured. Pity you cant do photos as well and I could junk my flickr subscription.
No more googling required. My videos have found their home.
One other thought for consideration. It would be great to be able to switch between SD and HD on embedded movies without having to embed both.
richard abrams asked a question in Motionbox on June 05, 2009 15:39:
Motionbox. Long Term Future?Suspect this is off topic and not really support. I'm about to commit a lot of my precious holiday videos to Motionbox and wonder if they will still be around for years to come. I know Motionbox are not a huge company and I'm slightly concerned that they wont be around long term. Anyone else got thoughts on this.
As it happens, having tested sooooo many alternatives. Motionbox is by far the best product that I have used.
Loading Profile...
