Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
Robertm replied on June 26, 2008 02:43 to the problem "using home made template" in PBwiki:
Rachel Pennig replied on June 25, 2008 21:40 to the problem "using home made template" in PBwiki:
Robertm reported a problem in PBwiki on June 25, 2008 19:48:
using home made templateI creat a new page and tagged it as a template but when I want to create a new page and click on my new template the informations do not appear in my new page
Robertm replied on June 25, 2008 19:46 to the question "How do I create a page template?" in PBwiki:
Casey Greene replied on June 10, 2008 17:45 to the question "How do I delete an unwanted file from pbwiki upload box??" in PBwiki:
Rosemary replied on June 09, 2008 22:55 to the question "How do I delete an unwanted file from pbwiki upload box??" in PBwiki:
Lizz replied on April 09, 2008 12:08 to the question "How do I delete an unwanted file from pbwiki upload box??" in PBwiki:
Rachel Pennig replied on April 08, 2008 22:19 to the question "How do I delete an unwanted file from pbwiki upload box??" in PBwiki:
Lizz replied on April 08, 2008 21:43 to the question "How do I delete an unwanted file from pbwiki upload box??" in PBwiki:
Vu Nguyen replied on March 27, 2008 20:50 to the question "Table of contents" in PBwiki:
Hi,
You might want to see my answer in this thread: http://getsatisfaction.com/pbwiki/top...
Hope that helps!
Vu
Guy Fawkes replied on March 25, 2008 17:04 to the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki:
Since most of the "workarounds" that we users use (and which PBwiki formerly allowed) were suggested in the old forums by actual PBwiki support staff, perhaps you might consider (if you ever create an FAQ for PBwiki) adding a section to your FAQ which clearly states these distinctions. It seems that just because "PBwiki the software platform" supports something doesn't necessarily imply that "PBwiki the company" does. But, since that distinction has never clearly and completely defined (before now), people have built wikis and communities around these features. A concise list of "things that, while they may work on PBwiki, may not work in the future" would be an excellent starting point. A "use at your own risk" sort of thing. Otherwise, you run the risk of "use at your own risk" becoming a tagline for the company.
Paul Singh replied on March 25, 2008 16:39 to the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki:
"If I seem brusque, I apologize. I just get frustrated when I can't get a straightforward response to a specific question."
Understood - I feel the same way.
Let me go back and answer the original question that started this thread: "Can I put a blog on my pbwiki and if I can, how to do it?"
The answer is no - we don't recommend it because there are a host of other options out there that specifically cater to the blogging market.
Now, if you're looking for workarounds, then there are some options but you should be aware that we do not support them and we don't offer any guarantees that they won't break in the future as the product evolves.
Guy Fawkes replied on March 25, 2008 16:24 to the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki:
Well, it's personal for *me*, because it affects me personally.
I notice that you have made it clear that certain new beta features, like allowing access to the HEAD of a wiki, will not be available after the beta period. Unfortunately for hundreds of users, no one made it clear two years ago that CSS and JS access, which was, and is still, permitted in PBwiki 1.0, would be unceremoniously yanked in PBwiki 2.0.
No one wants PBwiki to "solve every single use case". But PBwiki has, whether deliberately or accidentally, supported several use cases which they are apparently abandoning with the rollout of 2.0.
If that's not the case, and you do still intend to allow 1.0 users to use the same features they've been using for years, then feel free to make a definitive statement to that effect.
If I seem brusque, I apologize. I just get frustrated when I can't get a straightforward response to a specific question.
Paul Singh replied on March 25, 2008 15:51 to the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki:
Guy: I'm not sure why you've taken this so personally. My intention was to make it absolutely clear that we've never tried this method here *at* PBwiki.
To clarify: We use a separate installation of Wordpress to power our blog. Our PBwiki product isn't able to solve every single use case nor do we portray it in that light. If anyone else would like to try this, head over to wordpress.com and sign up for a blog.
Guy Fawkes replied on March 25, 2008 14:52 to the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki:
I think everyone knows that I do not represent PBwiki. I just wanted to be clear that this feature has worked at my free and paid PBwiki wikis, so they wouldn't think I was using it elsewhere.
How, exactly, would I install Wordpress on my PBwiki, like you guys did? Can *I* set up a "blog.MYWIKI.pbwiki.com"? How can I use your solution like you did?
Besides, you guys wouldn't break solutions that people have been using for years, would you? That wouldn't be right!
Paul Singh replied on March 25, 2008 14:42 to the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki:
Robertm replied on March 25, 2008 02:16 to the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki:
Guy Fawkes replied on March 25, 2008 01:34 to the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki:
Create a new page, then, using the Classic Editor, copy and paste the following code:
<script language="javascript">
document.getElementById('sb_qs').style.display = "none";
document.getElementById('sb_ra').style.display = "none";
document.getElementById('sb_sb').style.display = "none";
</script>
<iframe width=100% height=930 src="http://blog.pbwiki.com/"></iframe>
Replace "blog.pbwiki.com" with the address of your own blog (or any other web page!)
Robertm replied on March 25, 2008 01:01 to the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki:
Guy Fawkes started following the question "Having a blog" in PBwiki.
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...




