scooter's dashboard

Joe replied on September 23, 2008 16:22 to the question "Firefox 3 (on Mac) still not supported ?" in RescueTime:

If someone who is having this problem has a little bit of time to help do some more in depth troubleshooting, could you email me at team@rescuetime.com and reference "Firefox 3 URLs on OS X".

Thank you!

chrismetcalf replied on September 19, 2008 01:09 to the question "Firefox 3 (on Mac) still not supported ?" in RescueTime:

Why not build a FireFox extension that can report to RescueTime? Even GreaseMonkey would probably be able to push the URL of the currently loaded page to something on the local host.

scooter replied on September 15, 2008 18:27 to the question "Firefox 3 (on Mac) still not supported ?" in RescueTime:

yes, RescueTime is working fine with Safari (minus some weird idle issues)

Joe replied on September 15, 2008 18:18 to the question "Firefox 3 (on Mac) still not supported ?" in RescueTime:

Scooter / Zandoodlee -

Does RescueTime work with Safari on your systems? I'd like to make sure that we are still seeing a Firefox/Mozilla bug and not another issue with OS X and Applescript.

The bug that Mozilla is tracking on the Firefox AppleEvents issue has a patch that has been submitted, but it can still be some time before it makes it through the QA process there.

Zandoodlee replied on September 15, 2008 01:07 to the question "Firefox 3 (on Mac) still not supported ?" in RescueTime:

Same issues here. Duplicate issues as above, and no dice on the solution for now. Also happy to debug.

scooter replied on September 10, 2008 03:25 to the question "Firefox 3 (on Mac) still not supported ?" in RescueTime:

Hey Rescuetime folks -

I'm having the same problem (no data from FF3 on Mac), and for obvious reasons it makes RescueTime much less useful. Any chance you have a workaround in place? Happy to help test/debug any problems.

Chris Thomson replied on August 27, 2008 21:09 to the idea "tracking packages" in I want Sandy:

Brilliant idea. +1

Rael Dornfest replied on August 06, 2008 12:07 to the discussion "Status" in I want Sandy:

Good morning!

We just solved an issue with Sandy's not responding to direct messages on Twitter. She's just caught up and is back to being her usual twittering self.

We apologize for the inconvenience.

For more detail, see: http://getsatisfaction.com/iwantsandy...

—Rael

TessK started following the problem "my facebook twitter app never updates" in Twitter.

jrk replied on April 06, 2008 19:43 to the idea "tracking packages" in I want Sandy:

This is a surprisingly insightful and clever idea. In one respect it's a one-off feature that's somewhat orthogonal to the rest of what Sandy does, but in practice I think it's a *brilliant* one-off feature that fits particularly well into both the way you interact with Sandy (email requests and reminders/updates, iCal/RSS subscriptions, and explicit email queries) and the virtual assistant metaphor. Potentially a very useful and very natural/intuitive addition.

Tina K.J replied on April 06, 2008 08:58 to the idea "tracking packages" in I want Sandy:

That would be fantastic!!

Will replied on April 06, 2008 04:41 to the idea "tracking packages" in I want Sandy:

This would be unbelievably useful. Please make this!

DB replied on April 04, 2008 07:01 to the discussion "Jott to Sandy from your phone" in I want Sandy:

THIS IS THE COOLEST THING EVER! I hope you guys don't end up charging too much for this, what is your business plan?

Theory replied on March 17, 2008 18:44 to the discussion "Jott to Sandy from your phone" in I want Sandy:

PBinHtown,

Just say "tag as todo" when you jott to sandy.

—Theory

PBinHtown replied on March 17, 2008 15:44 to the discussion "Jott to Sandy from your phone" in I want Sandy:

I've had trouble getting it to recognize @ -- like "@todo". Just saying "at" hasn't worked for me.

Chris replied on February 14, 2008 00:04 to the idea "tracking packages" in I want Sandy:

I'd have to imagine that package tracking would be a minor part of the overall queue each day. Couldn't Sandy be set up to check for status differences every few hours until she "sees" a delivery confirmation? Certainly the major carriers all have APIs for this to call.

Rael Dornfest replied on February 05, 2008 05:57 to the discussion "Status" in I want Sandy:

Hi again,

Sandy's back on the job after only about 10 minutes.

Thanks for your patience.

—Rael

Rael Dornfest replied on February 05, 2008 05:44 to the discussion "Status" in I want Sandy:

Howdy,

We're having a very brief maintenance break — no more than 5-15 minutes — to complete some of the work we did last night.

I apologize for any inconvenience this might present. (But I will say that we have some rather cool stuff in the works for which this has been some preparatory work. ;-)

—Rael

Rael Dornfest replied on February 04, 2008 10:21 to the discussion "Status" in I want Sandy:

Howdy,

Sandy's back up and has already plowed through all of your email and incoming Twitter tweets.

Once again, I apologize for the downtime.

—Rael

Rael Dornfest replied on February 04, 2008 09:49 to the discussion "Status" in I want Sandy:

Hi folks,

We're still undergoing some maintenance — it's taking a wee bit longer than anticipated.

I apologize for the disruption in service. Sandy will be back to work and reading her email very shortly (and I'll be back with an update sooner than that).

—Rael