Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
sd replied on February 19, 2008 19:13 to the problem "Seeking repeal for the 50% penalty." in Hubdub:
besides i think you forgot to mention it nigel but i was patiently waiting for 12 hours on all three accounts before placing the bets..besides i wasn't too sure of the question either but i was willing to take a risk(risk of betting not gaming) considering the fact that if i won i would be back at my position.
One more thing , i don't see the harm in maintaining 3 accounts as long as i am not creating question off one and betting immediately betting with the other.you will notice that i have not displayed any such behaviour as mentioned above after receiving that last mail and so i think i deserve a refund.
ps:maybe it slipped your mind but all the money on that question wasn't mine ,i placed $29000 and the total was $52000 .
sd replied on February 19, 2008 19:03 to the problem "Seeking repeal for the 50% penalty." in Hubdub:
Ok look here , the question that has been put up here had been through the normal 12 hour ban on bets for me. if someone else fails to bet on it or if it isn't voided in 12 hours it is a lapse on your side and it isnt my fault and niether it is my fault if hubdub gives me the go ahead with the question after 12 hours.so it is only fair that i start pourin money into it after 12 hours , now you cant blame me for that . for that matter i propose that you remove the 5 -95 option to prevent people from using it .so where does this question of gaming arise.
ps: you were supposed to furnish me with details of my last gaming transaction which i am sure was before the day on which i recieved my warning.
sd replied on February 19, 2008 06:42 to the problem "Seeking repeal for the 50% penalty." in Hubdub:
sd replied on February 18, 2008 19:32 to the problem "Seeking repeal for the 50% penalty." in Hubdub:
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...
