Loading Profile...
Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
sgraber replied on November 17, 2009 12:52 to the idea "PDF downloads for those who buy a print" in MagCloud:
At this point I've had to go with e-Junkie to manage my purchasable PDFs. Please make purchasable PDFs an option at MagCloud.
Shane-
sgraber replied on October 09, 2009 14:29 to the idea "PDF downloads for those who buy a print" in MagCloud:
I'd really like to be able to upload a PDF and be able to sell my magazine in the following ways:
1. printed only
2. pdf download only
3. pdf download + printed (not necessarily a requirement but would be a nice option)
I'd use MagCloud *right now* if I had the option to sell a PDF download of my magazine on MagCloud. Our readers primarily want to be able to have a downloadable PDF of our magazine with a secondary focus on people wanting a printed version. What chance is there of MagCloud making a downloadable option at purchase time?
Thanks,
Shane -
sgraber started following the idea "PDF downloads for those who buy a print" in MagCloud.
-
sgraber started following the question "Do you ship to just US (per Help), or US, UK, & CA (per FAQ)?" in MagCloud.
-
sgraber started following the idea "Magclould needs to tell publishers who bought their mags" in MagCloud.
-
sgraber asked a question in IntenseDebate on March 12, 2009 01:49:
Specifying only idcomments_post_url causing problemsA bit of background: our CMS (Plone) will sometimes append '/view' or '/document_view' to a url when viewing a html page. I modified the IntenseDebate script a bit to remove those offending appends using the following:
[script]
var idcomments_acct = 'my-acct-#-goes-here';
var idcomments_post_id;
// Plone sometimes appends '/view' and '/document_view' to content items
// this will cause problems w/ intensedebate if we don't remove them!
var url = "http://" + location.hostname + location.pathname;
var view = "/view";
var document_view = "/document_view";
var idcomments_post_url = url.replace(view, "").replace(document_view, "");
[/script]
From my understanding, any posts that were made to a url containing '/', '/view', or '/document_view' should show up under '/'. Last month when I enabled comments on our site AdvancedAquarist.com using this modification, this modification worked without problems. I could post a comment to any of the following urls and the comments would show up properly under the http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2009/... url:
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2009/...
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2009/...
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2009/...
Today I noticed that people were commenting on articles and they were showing up only on urls that had '/view' in them. Here's an example:
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2008/...
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2008/...
Notice that this is the same article only with '/view' appended to the url. Also notice that there's two completely different comments at the end of the article. Based on my javascript modification above, this should not be happening but it is. Last month this was not an issue as I had tested it with all three url combinations and it showed the posts properly.
Any idea what's going on?
Shane -
