Sumeet Jain's Profile

Get Satisfaction uses Javascript and cookies.

You'll need to enable Javascript and cookies to log-in and participate.

Recent activity

Subscribe to this feed

Sumeet Jain shared an idea in Spymaster on May 30, 2009 00:05:

Safe House Risk Level Copy Clarity
Risk levels for Safe Houses could use additional clarity. Currently, the copy reads:

"Safe house locations carry an inherent risk ratio — this is the risk that your safe house will be compromised. If the risk ratio is greater than 1, the chances of you making back your property price are good. If the risk ratio is 1, the property is risk-free. If the risk is negative, the chances of compromise are great, but the reward is also healthy."

These "risk ratios" don't jive with the high-low levels. Does a low ratio mean high risk or low risk? I know the answer could be determined with some minor thought, but there's definitely an opportunity for more clarity there.
Sumeet Jain reported a problem in Crusher on November 21, 2008 22:09:

Too Many RSVP Options
The options for RSVPing are too many. Organizers want to know if someone is coming or if someone is not coming - period.

There is not enough of a difference between "Yes, I plan to" and "Count me in".

If some people want these additional RSVP options, maybe let them add them. But forcing everyone to offer extra options is confusing to invitees, who are not used to seeing a slider for this functionality.

Crusher is a good product, and I'll continue to show my support by using it and recommending it. But some of the user experience issues are holding it back from being what I think could be a legitimate threat to Evite.