Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
Tom Armitage replied on September 29, 2009 07:23 to the question "show local highscore" in Noticings:
Tom Armitage replied on September 19, 2009 08:46 to the idea "Show number of photos for the week" in Noticings:
Tom Armitage replied on September 18, 2009 16:41 to the question "Stemming the potential flood of dirge" in Noticings:
What Tom said. When we began the beta, the people playing were roughly doing what we hoped they'd do, and it was all turning out OK; now that it's open, a lot of people are uploading noticings without really thinking about the quality threshold that much. See also what Tom said about bulk uploads.
But that's OK: it's a design in progress. I think placing more emphasis on the images, and less on the scores - especially on that front page - might help emphasises the quality issue. We certainly know we've got some serious visual design to work on, and I'm planning to make that a priority in the coming weeks.
Rest assured: we're working on this. And thanks for the interest. In the meantime: the best way to help stem any "dirge" that might set in is to upload really "good" noticings; play the game in a gentlemanly manner, even if that means not getting as many points as you'd like.
Tom Armitage reported a problem in Dopplr on December 22, 2008 17:58:
There's an error in the text of my weekly digest.My digest says:
"In the next 2 weeks, you will start a trip to [TOWN X] and then a trip to [TOWN Y]"
In fact, I am travelling first to TOWN Y and then to TOWN X. Dopplr itself elsewhere has this correct: the dates for the two trips are correct, and the two trips are in the correct order on my "soon, later" heading.
I added these two trips as two consecutive legs on the trip. The only place it's incorrect is the mailing I received this morning.
Tom Armitage replied on September 25, 2008 13:39 to the problem "Automatically posting to twitter - bad." in My Name is E:
I'm not an E user, but I was irritated by the automatic message from my friends who are trying it, and I'm sure they wouldn't have sent it if they had a choice.
Worst of all, they've typed their password for another service into E, which is a major security problem - the "password anti-pattern" Jeremy mentions - and the E website doesn't make it nearly clear enough that in order to use this service, you must hand over your credentials for other services. It's couched in way too much fluffiness - users should understand the seriousness of what they're doing when they sign up to E.
Loading Profile...
