Loading Profile...
Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
Trey replied on June 08, 2009 01:17 to the problem "Foxmarks update for IE fails" in Xmarks:
The Foxmarks 0.9.85 installer is located here:
http://static.foxmarks.com/clients/ie...
I hope this helps!-
Trey replied on June 01, 2009 17:56 to the question "Xmarks.com unreachable or blocked? (a.k.a. Xmarks.com is not porn!)" in Xmarks:
I have spoken with Lightspeed support directly on your behalf, and this is the response we received from them:
"Xmarks.com is currently categorised as "computers", your clients who use Total Traffic Control are blocking this domain locally and will need to allow this category themselves.
To do so they would have to either create a separate category and move your domain there or move your domain to the local allow category.
If your clients are unable to do this please ask them to create a support ticket where one of our technicians’ can guide them over how to allow this domain."
I hope this helps resolve your issues! -
Trey replied on May 31, 2009 04:02 to the question "Xmarks.com unreachable or blocked? (a.k.a. Xmarks.com is not porn!)" in Xmarks:
I used the Lightspeed query tool to look up www.xmarks.com:
http://www.lightspeedsystems.com/reso...
and it seems we are categorized properly as Computers & Internet". Is it possible your administrators need to update to the latest lightspeed database? Lightspeed appears to have updated Xmarks categorization in mid April. -
Trey replied on May 19, 2009 23:13 to the question "Xmarks.com unreachable or blocked? (a.k.a. Xmarks.com is not porn!)" in Xmarks:
For French users of the SLIS proxy, the SLIS administrators have confirmed that xmarks.com is filtered in the 3.x version; presently the best fixes for this are to whitelist the xmarks.com domain or update to the 4.x version of SLIS to get the appropriate filters in place.
While waiting for your network administrators to update SLIS, downgrading to Foxmarks 2.7.2 is currently your best option, though we're continually working on finding a better alternative. You can find 2.7.2 here: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fire... -
Trey set one of pcorcoran's replies as an official response to "Avira repeatedly reports virus detection at xmarks.com" in Xmarks
-
Trey set one of Trey's replies as an official response to "Xmarks sync blocked" in Xmarks
-
Trey replied on May 19, 2009 17:10 to the problem "Xmarks sync blocked" in Xmarks:
iCritical has confirmed that xmarks.com has been recategorized as "Business & Commercial" site. The information should propagate down to your system during the next database update. Thanks for bringing this service to our attention! I am going to redirect this topic to our main thread on the web filters/proxies topic.
http://getsatisfaction.com/foxmarks/t... -
Trey replied on May 18, 2009 22:55 to the problem "Xmarks sync blocked" in Xmarks:
Sorry for the frustration! We're very much aware of this problem and are working diligently to get things fixed up for folks. We have contacted iCritical, and they are working to resolve this issue with their 3rd party URL database. They say it's easy for your company to recategorize sites in order to make exceptions within the system, but we are hoping for a quick resolution with their data source issue. We hope to have an update on this very soon. -
bdb4269's reply to "^N or "new window" fails in firefox 3.0.3 and Vista" was just promoted to the most useful! Trey and 4 other people think it's one of the best replies.
I think I have it figured out.
Short story: Disable the skype addon -- it seems to cause a conflict with multiple other addons (xmarks, tabmix plus, stumble upon) which causes the New Window to not work.
Long version.
So I decided to disable all addons except xmarks, and restart (this is still int he new profile) -- when I did, the initial after install window came up (never even realized it didn't come up after I instaled xmarks) --- So I logged into my account etc, and it did the initial sync, blah blah --- and New Window worked -- So I enabled addons 1 by 1 and skype is the one that makes it not work. (Though skype does not do it alone -- it seems to be the main factor that when combined with xmarks, (or tabmixplus, or stumbleupon) causes the New Window problem.
I went back to my default profile, and enabled Tabmixplus, stumble upon, and xmarks, and disabled skype, and New Window works fine!!
I will write skype about this -- and everyone else should too.
But if you guys at xmarks can figure out a way around it -- that would be awesome!!! -
Trey replied on April 21, 2009 17:49 to the problem "Xmarks blocked by WebMarshal" in Xmarks:
Ted: You are welcome to revert to using the previous Foxmarks 2.7.2 extension, although we cannot guarantee it will work indefinitely. You can find the previous extension versions here:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fire... -
Trey set one of Trey's replies as an official response to "Xmarks blocked by WebMarshal" in Xmarks
-
Trey replied on April 21, 2009 17:11 to the problem "Xmarks blocked by WebMarshal" in Xmarks:
We have verified that Web Marshal categorizes Xmarks properly as a software company, please see this topic on web filters/proxy servers:
http://getsatisfaction.com/foxmarks/t... -
Trey asked a question in Xmarks on April 21, 2009 00:40:
Xmarks.com unreachable or blocked? (a.k.a. Xmarks.com is not porn!)Several folks have run into an issue with a web filter, proxy, or firewall with www.xmarks.com at their workplace. If you find that Xmarks is getting blocked, please post the specific brand of filter you're using and we will work with the vendor to get this error corrected.
We have recently verified that Xmarks is properly classified with the list of web filter products below. If your company is using one of the following products, please ask your local administrator to refresh your web filter/proxy database to the latest copy.
SquidGuard Blacklists: http://www.squidguard.org/blacklists....
- MESD
- Shalla's
- Université Toulouse collection
- URLBlacklist.com
Barracuda Central: http://www.barracudacentral.org/looku...
BlueCoat ProxySG: http://www.bluecoat.com/products/sg
Bloxx: http://www.bloxx.com/
Cisco Ironport: http://www.ironport.com/
CyberRoam: http://www.cyberoam.com/
GFI WebMonitor: http://www.gfi.com/webmon/
IBM Proventia (Cobion) Web Filter: http://filterdb.iss.net/urlcheck/url-...
iCritical: http://www.icritical.com/solutions_we...
McAfee Web Filters: http://www.trustedsource.org/urlcheck/
- SiteAdvisor
- SmartFilter
- WebWasher
NetSentron: http://www.netsentron.com/
RuleSpace: http://rulespace.com/rater.php
Smoothwall: http://www.smoothwall.net
Sonicwall Content Filtering: http://www.sonicwall.com/us/products/...
TrendMicro: http://reclassify.url.trendmicro.com/...
URLFilterDB: http://www.urlfilterdb.com
WebMarshal: http://www.marshal.com/products/webma...
WebSense: https://www.websense.com -
Trey replied on April 17, 2009 19:32 to the question "XMARKS is blocked by proxyadmin@fbn.ca" in Xmarks:
Fred,
We did have some problems a few weeks ago with a few of the free squid blacklist data sources that are located here:
http://www.squidguard.org/blacklists....
That said, we were successful in removing xmarks.com from all of these lists. My hope is that if you report this issue to your proxy admin team, they can refresh the data source and remove the current proxy issue. If you discover a data source that still reports a problem, we are happy to help! -
Trey replied on April 16, 2009 18:49 to the question "Xmarks blocked by Bloxx" in Xmarks:
doctofor: McAfee has Xmarks categorized properly as an "Internet Services" company, which you can verify here, http://www.trustedsource.com/. I have also tested while running the McAfee "SiteAdvisor" Firefox plugin with success. Can you give more insight into which specific McAfee product blocks Xmarks? -
Trey replied on April 15, 2009 20:56 to the problem "Xmarks blocked by WebMarshal" in Xmarks:
I have recently checked the Web Marshall categorization and they have www.xmarks.com classified properly:
* Search Engines / Web Catalogues / Portals
* Software / Hardware
Please ask your local administrator to refresh your Web Marshall database.
TheJuice: What web filtering product you are using at your office? -
Trey replied on April 15, 2009 20:43 to the question "Xmarks blocked by Bloxx" in Xmarks:
I have been assured by the Bloxx staff in both the US and European offices, that Xmarks was completely removed from their central database two weeks ago. Your local administrator should need to do nothing more than update to the most recent Bloxx database and Xmarks will be available again. -
Trey set one of Trey's replies as an official response to "Xmarks blocked by Bloxx" in Xmarks
-
Trey replied on April 14, 2009 20:03 to the problem "xmarks not a porn site" in Xmarks:
Can you give us any more specific information on which government owned company you are mentioning here? We will need a product name or an entity to talk to, in order to support you with this issue. -
Trey replied on April 09, 2009 20:42 to the question "INVALID security CERTIFICATE" in Xmarks:
While we hope you upgraded to the new Xmarks client to fix this temporary ssl cert issue, this issue has now been permanently resolved. Thanks for your patience on this!
| next » « previous |
