Viktor's dashboard

Viktor replied on January 03, 2009 22:29 to the problem "Slow performance with Foxmarks and Firefox 3.0.5?" in Xmarks:

Right, just to confirm this. Had been frustrated with firefox's performance recently. I thought it had to do with the fancy address bar searching my web history or something like that, but simply disabling foxmarks has made the browser perform fast as usual.

I use firefox 3.0.5 and foxmarks 2.6.0 on Vista and XP, both have this issue.

Viktor started following the problem "Slow performance with Foxmarks and Firefox 3.0.5?" in Xmarks.

Viktor replied on September 01, 2008 14:01 to the problem "Efficiency and productivity charts of previous weeks at zero" in RescueTime:

Hmmm... Now, my last two weeks also show as zeroes. Am I the only one having this issue? Seems the data is all there, but the summary graphs are simply wrong. Although this really is a minor issue, it ruins my dashboard and I can no longer see how incredibly productive and efficient I am...

Viktor started following the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime.

Viktor started following the idea "Some distractions during work are productive over the weekend." in RescueTime.

Viktor started following the idea "Goals per week or month" in RescueTime.

Viktor reported a problem in RescueTime on August 18, 2008 10:42:

Efficiency and productivity charts of previous weeks at zero

This is a minor issue, because everything seems fine, but the small charts under the efficiency and productivity displays seem wrong. They show my last few weeks at zero, although that's not what it says if one goes back one week.

I've included screenshots, the first is the current week, and the second is for last week:

Viktor started following the problem "Time logged although computer was in standby" in RescueTime.

A comment on the question "User-defined splitting of large sites" in RescueTime:

Thanks for the quick reply. I understand that this is not a high priority. However, in the case of Wikipedia, splitting it into two "sites" -- 1) Wikipedia and 2) Wikipedia (editing) -- would only require matching simple strings in the URLs. Isn't that, more or less, how you already distinguish subdomains of google? Perhaps a more sensible approach would be to allow users to collectively define sub-domains similar to how categories are set by voting. Once a subdomain gets enough votes, it is installed in the database... – Viktor, on June 11, 2008 19:24

Viktor marked one of Tony's replies in RescueTime as useful. Tony replied to the question "User-defined splitting of large sites".

Viktor asked a question in RescueTime on June 11, 2008 11:23:

User-defined splitting of large sites

Currently, all of Wikipedia is tracked as a reference/search site. That's not entirely true :) I would like to know how much time I spend editing Wikipedia and how much I just use it for reference. A few simple regular expressions, such as en.wikipedia.org/*[Tt]alk:* or looking for action=edit, would do the trick ...

Wouldn't it make sense to let users split up sites themselves?