Recent activity
Subscribe to this feed
A comment on the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime:
That's great. When you get the source code cleaned up can you make it available? Thanks – Darren, on October 09, 2008 20:24
A comment on the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime:
That's great. When you get the source code cleaned yp can you make it available? Thanks – Darren, on October 09, 2008 20:23
GGuy replied on October 09, 2008 18:10 to the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime:
Has anybody tried ManicTime? I had the same problem, not much at the computer and I wanted to track idle time so I can see how long a meeting took.
After trying everything out there, and I mean everything i found ManicTime. I have been using it for a couple of months now and it works great. It tracks the applications you use and your idle time.
But I think it is windows only.
A comment on the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime:
NEVER MIND! I found it through Google! – Showbiz, on October 09, 2008 18:05
A comment on the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime:
GGuy, how about a link? – Showbiz, on October 09, 2008 18:04
GGuy replied to "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?", but it was removed. see the change log
Derringer replied on October 03, 2008 23:27 to the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime:
krschultz replied on September 27, 2008 21:41 to the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime:
This would make the top of my list of "things that would make Rescue Time a must have". I have no problem paying for web services that help me stay productive. (Remember the Milk is the best $25 I ever spent), but I find it hard to use Rescue Time effectively when 50-60% of my time is spent off the computer.
A comment on the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime:
I think Tony said it in the first response "We have some cool ideas around this that we'll hopefully get around to soon. Too much to do, too little time!" I know the feeling! ;) – Leslie Chicoine, on September 17, 2008 18:37
ppgs replied on September 13, 2008 07:46 to the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime:
Viktor replied on September 01, 2008 14:01 to the problem "Efficiency and productivity charts of previous weeks at zero" in RescueTime:
-
Viktor started following the question "Can I use RescueTime to record non-computer tasks?" in RescueTime.
-
Viktor started following the idea "Some distractions during work are productive over the weekend." in RescueTime.
-
Viktor started following the idea "Goals per week or month" in RescueTime.
-
Mark Posen started following the problem "Efficiency and productivity charts of previous weeks at zero" in RescueTime.
Viktor reported a problem in RescueTime on August 18, 2008 10:42:
Efficiency and productivity charts of previous weeks at zeroThis is a minor issue, because everything seems fine, but the small charts under the efficiency and productivity displays seem wrong. They show my last few weeks at zero, although that's not what it says if one goes back one week.
I've included screenshots, the first is the current week, and the second is for last week:
-
Viktor started following the problem "Time logged although computer was in standby" in RescueTime.
JackH replied on July 03, 2008 19:55 to the question "User-defined splitting of large sites" in RescueTime:
Tony said:
"1) Doing that in such a way that our servers down melt.
2) Doing that in such a way that is easy to use and easy to understand.
#2 is easier than #1. "
I'm not sure about that. Actually I think #1 is easier than #2. As ..:
I'd like this tagging to be local. I know that this is more difficult to debug and it's more difficult to help the user setting it up and it's more difficult to user the power of the crowd, when everyone is doing it locally.
For all of that: You can have my local script and change it from the website. And recommend scripts to me on the website. But I want to be able to locally change "https://twitter.com/Scobleizer" into "https://twitter.com/fun" and I want change "https://mybank.com/asdfkasfdg/asl#asd.asdfawer3" into "https://mybank.com" locally. I'd be happy for you to know all my scripts (regular expressions) but I'd be much happier if I could choose whether you ever got into your server whose twitter pages I look at.
A comment on the question "User-defined splitting of large sites" in RescueTime:
Thanks for the quick reply. I understand that this is not a high priority. However, in the case of Wikipedia, splitting it into two "sites" -- 1) Wikipedia and 2) Wikipedia (editing) -- would only require matching simple strings in the URLs. Isn't that, more or less, how you already distinguish subdomains of google? Perhaps a more sensible approach would be to allow users to collectively define sub-domains similar to how categories are set by voting. Once a subdomain gets enough votes, it is installed in the database... – Viktor, on June 11, 2008 19:24
Viktor marked one of Tony's replies in RescueTime as useful. Tony replied to the question "User-defined splitting of large sites".
| next » « previous |
Loading Profile...


