Get your own customer support community

Recent activity

Subscribe to this feed
  • Wayne started following the idea "A remote SongBird?" in Songbird.

  • Wayne started following the idea "Songbird Web Interface? (remote control)" in Songbird.

  • problem

    Wayne replied on September 05, 2008 22:58 to the problem "No "Print" Option under the file menu." in Songbird:

    Wayne
    Actually I wonder how useful it would be to some people to be able to print a playlist as well?

    I'd make it *super* low priority for now, but if you burn a CD, it might be nice to be able to print a song list for it. Maybe format it so that it could fit in a CD case?

    Just thinking out loud here...
  • idea

    Wayne replied on September 05, 2008 02:54 to the idea ""Night Mode" or "Dynamic Range Compression"" in Songbird:

    Wayne
    I just stumbled across these passages in Slim Devices's Squeezebox Boom Audio Design document ( http://wiki.slimdevices.com/uploads/a... )

    At the bottom of page 13 they list a few future enhancements you might find interesting (unless of course they only apply to hardware):

    Future Enhancements
    There are several future enhancements that we would like to make to the Squeezebox Boom that didn’t make it in for the first software release.
    • Loudness filter. The loudness filter is a dynamic filter that compensates for the loss of sensitivity at low SPL levels, depending on the volume setting. As the volume is turned down, the bass needs to be boosted in order to maintain spectral balance.
    • Midnight mode. This mode would apply dynamic range compression when the volume is turned very low, and perhaps disable the loudness filter. The idea is that when the volume is very low, dynamic range compression may be used so that quiet passages in a track remain audible. It will also disable loudness, preventing low frequency sound from permeating the house and disturbing family and friends.
    • Dynamic range compression. When listening to music in noisy environments, applying dynamic range compression is a good thing – as with midnight mode, it allows quiet passages to remain audible over the noise.
  • idea

    Wayne replied on September 05, 2008 00:41 to the idea ""Night Mode" or "Dynamic Range Compression"" in Songbird:

    Wayne
    I'm not sure this applies, but the Wikipedia page has a listing of software players which use DRC.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_...

    However, it doesn't go into detail as to what they do or how they do it. For instance the tracks might have to be scanned ahead of time, or it might not be very effective.

    End result: I'm not qualified to judge on this.
  • idea

    Wayne shared an idea in Songbird on September 04, 2008 01:11:

    Wayne
    "Night Mode" or "Dynamic Range Compression"
    Back when I was running a nForce motherboard the sound drivers had a "Night Mode" which would "compress" the highs and lows so you could hear everything clearly at a softer volume. A sort of "Don't wake the neighbours" mode. (Or the better half.)

    I found it useful at the time, maybe others would too.

    I believe this is the technical term for it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_...
  • Wayne started following the idea "Zune Support with songbird?" in Songbird.

  • idea

    Wayne replied on September 02, 2008 18:54 to the idea "Automated rating add-on based on chart position." in Songbird:

    Wayne
    I don't speak the language of code but I did a little digging.

    Last.fm has a API page: http://www.last.fm/api as well as a host site for apps developed with it: http://build.last.fm/

    I'm not sure if I'm reading it right, but it doesn't seem to have anything for taking the userbase as a whole. You seem to be able to compare against specific people.

    If you want to add "social" to Songbird and make it fully Buzzword Compliant you might be able to tap into Last.fm friends or neighbors to get their opinion of a song and then use that for a auto-rating.

    But I have no idea how complicated that might be. (For instance, I only have about 3000 rated out of my 18,000 tracks so Last.fm might not like to see that much traffic...)

    I wasn't able to find anything similar for Mog.com or iTMS. I'm sure there are other sites I don't know about that might offer that kind of information.

    According to Wikipedia, American Top 40 uses the listings generated by Mediabase: http://www.mediabasemusic.com/

    They have http://www.ratethemusic.com and http://www.americasmusiccharts.com/ but they don't provide searches on past weeks and, to be frank, the webpages don't exactly look to be Web 2.0 aware.

    Wikipedia itself has #1's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_...

    And top seller's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_in_...
  • Wayne started following the idea "Please, please! add support for airtunes" in Songbird.

  • Wayne started following the idea "Crossfading for songbird" in Songbird.

  • Wayne started following the idea "fade song out" in Songbird.

  • idea

    Wayne replied on August 30, 2008 13:59 to the idea "Automated rating add-on based on chart position." in Songbird:

    Wayne
    Interesting idea. While I'm not keen on having my personally set ratings being changed, it would be kinda cool to have Songbird use something like the popularity of a track on Last.fm to give unrated tracks in my library a "suggested" rating.

    Or maybe (since I'm obsessed with automation in Songbird) use the Last.fm popularity to influence a songs rating when it comes to random song selection.
  • idea

    Wayne replied on August 28, 2008 17:23 to the idea "Songbird should cooperate with Squeezecenter" in Songbird:

    Wayne
    I've been thinking about getting a Squeezebox for a while now but I'm not that happy with SqueezeCenter, or at least the interface for it.

    It would be wonderful if Songbird could act as a secondary interface for a SqueezeBox/SqueezeCenter.
  • question

    Wayne replied on August 23, 2008 22:29 to the question "What to do about "Christmas"?" in Songbird:

    Wayne
    For anyone who might be following this that still cares, I tried to formalize my thoughts a little bit and put it forth as an "idea".

    http://getsatisfaction.com/songbird/t...
  • idea

    Wayne shared an idea in Songbird on August 23, 2008 18:29:

    Wayne
    Smart Party Shuffle?
    This idea occurred to me while asking here about what to do about my Christmas music. I've written up some ideas on my blog as I was hashing this over in my mind and I'm going to repost it here to get others opinion. ('Cause really, no one cares about my blog. ;)

    It's a little wordy, but I hope it gets the point across.

    _____________________

    The new version of SongBird is amazing. It just gets better and better. I'm hoping that by version 1.0 I'll be ready to switch away from iTunes.

    One of the things I'm going to need to be fixed before then is what do to about Christmas music. If I rate a Christmas song a full 5 stars, it'll show up in my Highest Rated playlist. Which would be fine, if it was December. During the summer months when I'm arguing to turn on the A/C it's not exactly something I want to hear.

    Under iTunes, I simply create a smart playlist called Christmas Music then do a select all on the results and uncheck the songs. Then none of the other playlists will include those songs.

    Nice.

    Songbird doesn't have that feature yet, nor can I create a Christmas Music list and tell the Highest Rated playlist to ignore songs that are also in Christmas Music. But these are all things that are going to be fixed.

    But how about if I want it more then fixed? Why can't Songbird be better?

    Why can't Songbird recognise when it's appropriate to play Christmas songs?

    Or for that matter, what about other types of tracks? Like Comedy. Once again, I might give Robin Williams 5-stars but I don't want that showing up in Highest Rated when I just hit play.

    I started to think about this more and more after I initially posted in the Songbird forums.

    Imagine a way to give Songbird some idea of what's going on around it? Such as the time of year, time of day, or maybe even it's location. Then let it be able to tune playlists to those situations.

    Time of year: When to play seasonal music and when not to. Christmas is one of the main points here, but I also have tracks which are really only for Halloween. I also have a CD of national anthems - wouldn't it be cool to play those on the nation's respective "<Insert Country Name Here> Day"? Maybe play Happy Birthday on your birthday?

    Time of day: Some people would like to hear Nine Inch Nails in the morning, some wouldn't. Maybe you'd like your playlist to blend into softer music before bedtime on a weekday and maybe a little more rock'en on Friday night. Those who have left their teenage punk roots behind but not their music might prefer if some tracks would be kept out of rotation until the kids are asleep.

    Location: Laptops are starting to come with GPS and a computer can get an idea of where it is based off it's IP address. Your workplace might frown on Gangsta Rap, or maybe you just stay more focused if songs have no lyrics. If you're enroute somewhere you might want travelling music.

    So how would this work? I'm not sure.

    My first thought is to have a new selection appear just under Library and have it called something like BirdBrain ('cause it's smart) or DJ Bird ('cause it does all the mixing for you) or a more "Apple" style name of Concierge ('cause it thinks it knows what's best for you). And have it as a generally more intelligent version of Party Shuffle on iTunes.

    Or maybe that would keep it too separate from the rest of things? Perhaps it should just work in the background with the main Library and the smart playlists that are already there. I imagine normal playlists would be left alone since they are made with specific tracks.

    As for what it would do in the background I can see at this point two main tasks. Based off rules which the user can create (or perhaps Songbird could even learn) Songbird would enable or disable tracks from playing outright - or change the statistical chance of a song being selected for random play.

    At first there was talk of iTunes' randomization not being random enough. Then Apple made a feature of making it less random with the ability to focus on songs from the same album or artist. I'm suggesting to take that level of randomness down another notch.

    A quick scenario on how this might work:

    The Rules

    Global (In place unless a following rule comes into effect)

    • No Music tagged with: Christmas, Comedy, Spoken Word, Halloween, Anthem, Bad


    6 AM - 9 AM Everyday

    • No Music tagged with: Heavy, Loud, Industrial, Techno, Sad, Blues

    • Increase chance of Music tagged: Easy Listening, Morning Music, Soft, Energetic, Happy


    9 PM - 12 PM Worknights (Sunday Night - Thursday Night)

    • Gradually Decrease chance of music tagged: Energetic, Peppy, High Tempo, Loud

    • Gradually Increase chance of music tagged: Slow, Quite, Sleepy, Relaxed, Ambient


    While At Work:

    • No Music Tagged: Course Language, Loud

    • Significantly Increase chance of Music tagged: Instrumental


    December 1 - December 24

    • Gradually Significantly Increase chance of Music tagged: Christmas


    July 1

    • Significantly Increase chance of track:" O Canada.mp3"


    What it means

    The date and time settings are obvious. "No Music" is simply disabling of tracks from playing. "Increase/Decrease chance" means to boost or hinder the "randomness" of a track being played. While "Significantly" simply means exactly that, I'm thinking you could choose a few levels of randomness interference. Increase Chance, Modestly Increase Chance, Significantly Increase Chance or something like that.

    "Gradually" affects how the rule is implemented for the duration of the rule. So if Significantly Increase boosts a tracks chances by, say 90%, and that rule is in effect for 3 hours/days/months then the statistical boost starts off low and and then increases to 90% at the end of the rule duration.

    So in the Christmas rule above, you only get a few Christmas songs at first and then get many by Christmas Eve.

    So what do you think? Good idea?
next » « previous