Some people missed my point.
I have no issue with paying for quality software that fills a need that other software does not.
Problem is, postbox doesn't fill that need for me.
1) Tags don't sync automatically across imap servers. you have to enter the tags on each computer you use.
2) No apple script support on Mac, so you can't use it properly with other system tools (iCal, etc ...)
3) Conversation view is lacking, and not smart enough to the point of frustration. Needs tools to be able to merge and separate threads more easily.
4) Searching leaves a lot to be desired ... attaching saved searches to an account, even though they can search across accounts, is a usability nightmare to the point that they were useless for me. They need their own panel.
I can go on and on.
The ideas behind postbox are great. But they are putting ideas in, then adding more features or refining features that are less important for a working email client.
Here is my previous list, from a long time ago, of things that i consider essential before a 1.0 can be released. These are things that would "polish" so that it feels like a "real" email client as well as bring it up to par with what people expect in a real email client.
http://getsatisfaction.com/postbox/to...
I had really high hopes for post box. I would GLADLY pay
$50 for post box, as well as another $50 at every major x.0 release. A good, high quality, email client is hard to come by. Thunderbird and Mail.App and Outlook are not good or high quality. But they are "polished" ... if Postbox got all the bugs worked out and everything gets refined they COULD have that. Right now, they just aren't there.