Could adjusting the filtering level be any slower? Seriously, could it?
I would like to drastically speed up the flitering level adjustment process. There are at least three ways to do this:
#1 - Allow the user to set a default filtering level for new feeds.
#2 - When importing a block of feeds, allow the user to set a flitering level prior to the actual import process
#3 - On the "My Feeds" page, instead of dropdown lists for each feed, the page could have columns for ALL, GOOD, GREAT, and BEST and the user could check the level for each feed. This would shorten the process of click, wait for dropdown list to expand, select, repeat for each item. Alternatively (or in addition), have a global checkbox and a select action box (think of selecting a whole page of messages in gmail)
#1 - Allow the user to set a default filtering level for new feeds.
#2 - When importing a block of feeds, allow the user to set a flitering level prior to the actual import process
#3 - On the "My Feeds" page, instead of dropdown lists for each feed, the page could have columns for ALL, GOOD, GREAT, and BEST and the user could check the level for each feed. This would shorten the process of click, wait for dropdown list to expand, select, repeat for each item. Alternatively (or in addition), have a global checkbox and a select action box (think of selecting a whole page of messages in gmail)
2
people like this idea
I like this idea!
Tell me when this idea gets some attention.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The best points from everyone
-
BTW Todd, we owe you a shirt for the tip. PIng me your preferred size and address and we'll get one out to you. jeff -at- aiderss.com
I’m thankful
The company thinks
this is one of the best points
-
Todd,
yep we definitely need to make that easier. Consider it officially on our backlog.
The company and 2 other people think
this is one of the best points
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
-
Inappropriate?Todd,
yep we definitely need to make that easier. Consider it officially on our backlog.
The company and 2 other people think
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?Thanks for the prompt reply. I broke my own rule and did not point out that when criticizing a FREE service, it's appropriate to thank the providers for their efforts as well. I was a bit frustrated after going through the process of adjusting the filtering levels of a large block of feeds. As for the title of the item, well, your page encouraged me to create an eye-catching title, so I did my best.
And now, the official thanks: AideRSS is a great service with a great purpose behind it. Thanks to you and all those involved.
I’m happy
2 people think
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?BTW Todd, we owe you a shirt for the tip. PIng me your preferred size and address and we'll get one out to you. jeff -at- aiderss.com
I’m thankful
The company thinks
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?I noticed two things today - the input method hasn't changed, and I still don't have my t-shirt
I’m sad
-
Hi Todd - A specific contact to send your info to might help. :) Send it to melanie at aiderss dot com. Our Ops person is off this week, so I'll take care of sending out your shirt. -
I emailed you with the info -
Hi Todd -- Got the email, thanks, and you should have your shirt in a few days. -
Inappropriate?Todd, we've implemented suggestion #3 - in your 'My Feeds' section, click on 'Manage Feeds', and you'll see quick selectors for changing the filtering level for many feeds at once.
Sounds like the t-shirt is MIA, can you please ping us with your address, and preferred size once more?
-
I emailed Melanie, as she beat you to the punch. -
She tends to do that... :-)
Loading Profile...





EMPLOYEE