What makes Satisfaction different than traditional customer service or a traditional forum?

Inappropriate?
1 person has this question
  • Inappropriate?
    - Satisfaction allows many of your questions to be answered by other customers while still allowing the participation of employees or company representatives when the companies are involved in the community


    - Our real-time word matching brings up possible answers to your question before you even post your topic


    - It's easy to find answers when they exist because the best answers rise to the top


    - You can keep track of issues you care about by subscribing to a tag feed


    - You can express your mood about a topic or gauge the mood of the community around a particular topic using the "Satisfactometer"


    These are just a few of the features that distinguish Satisfaction.
     
    happy I’m excited
  • Ted Shelton
    Inappropriate?
    But why is this different from a forum site? Search? Really want to understand. thanks.
     
    indifferent I’m undecided
  • Inappropriate?
    While it's a good question, I think it's a red herring because it focuses on *form* rather than *purpose*. There are many kinds of discussion boards, and if you look closely even systems as far flung as Flickr and Wordpress look like specialized forums. Conversation may be the central organizing unit of the Web (certainly the social Web), and so it shouldn't be any surprise that systems that foster it bear many of the same hallmarks--a sequence of remarks linked to their authors.

    Still, the problems with classic forums are well known, particularly in the context of mainstream customer service. The best answers get buried in long conversations, they breed endless duplicate topics, they're hard to search, they tend to be either under-populated or clubby. They generally aren't friendly or inviting to casual use. Satisfaction aims to harness open conversation without falling into these traps. One example of how we're doing this so far is the "talk box" at the top of the page--we've merged the process of actually asking a question and searching. The result is very few duplicate topics, and more focused engagement around the issues. The pages are designed to be more like blog posts, with each topic creating a focused conversation piece that makes sense even when entered from a Google search. The conversation threads themselves are more personal, more Flickr-like.

    From the standpoint of customer service traditional forums are too general purpose to be *that* useful. We're building tools that support the distinct activities that dominate conversations between customers and companies--questions, problems and ideas. There are outcomes and interactions in these activities that Satisfaction will be uniquely suited to support. Initially, we are providing companies the ability to mark certain answers as "official responses," and communities to vote best answers to the top. This has the surprising effect of auto-generating FAQs based on the real interactions with and between customers.

    Perhaps most dramatically, we provide Satisfaction as an open Web service that allows third parties (including companies) to embed the content and functionality directly into their own sites and applications any way they want to. We're providing easy-to-use widgets, an open api and other tools to extend Satisfaction into any corner of the Web where they can help customers get the help they need.

    The central premise of Satisfaction is that it serves as a neutral ground for customers to communicate with each other *and* the companies they do business with. The community is not "owned" by any company, but there is a specific context for every company to participate (and tools that make this valuable). The result is a more trusting, authentic conversation space. Ultimately, Satisfaction is a network of customers and the products and services they use. The value of this approach for providing a higher level of support will become apparent over time -- or so we're betting.
     
    happy I’m sanguine
    Sprite_screen The company and 2 other people say this answers the question
  • Ted Shelton
    Inappropriate?
    Thor

    Terrific explanation. Totally agree with your premise and points. As a first time user coming to your site I did not understand the combined function of your talk box and even when I used it and had an "aha that's cool" moment, I didn't get the other points you are making here about how that seemingly simple change impacts the entire experience -- by reducing duplicate questions, bringing the best answers to the top, etc

    I look forward to following your development and resolution of these issues. At least for me, you now have me interested and willng to try.

    one missing piece of getting satisfaction-- how can you assist in bringing customer feedback to vendors? Especially the ones that aren't listening?
     
    happy I’m thankful
  • Inappropriate?
    Thanks for all the useful feedback. We have plenty of work to do to embody our ideas in a crystal clear way for everyone--but we're working hard to close the gap.

    As for the "missing piece" you mention, we intend to make it impossible for these "deaf" companies to pretend they can't hear their customers. I don't want to give too much away about upcoming plans (what would be the fun in that?), but we agree that this is a critical piece of the puzzle.
     
    happy I’m excited about the future
    Sprite_screen 1 person says this answers the question
User_default_medium