Loading Profile...
Excluding websites from activities when Browser is included
Well, I'm not sure if this is a problem, but it seems like it to me. Let's say that I essentially do two things on the internet, check my business email on gmail and screw around. Then I would set up gmail for email in activities, and I would also add my browser to the "Screwing around" activity. However, it appears that currently if I am on gmail it will both add time to my email activity *and* my "screwing around" activity. It would be nice if there were a way to distinguish one of two things: either 1) have a setting that basically says if adding a browser to activity A to only include the browser usage with A if you are not browsing sites counted in other activities and/or 2) when adding websites also include a box to *exclude* the website (or assume that when the box next to a website is not checked for a given activity A that if you are on that website *not* to include it with activity A). Anyhow, just a thought.
I’m appreciative
1
person has this problem
I have this problem, too!
Tell me when someone solves it.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
-
Inappropriate?If there's such a clear distinction, you can setup an activity for email, like you did and then everything else you can track by looking at the Applications View and see how much time you spent on your browser.
If you are setting goals, however, I understand how this might be a problem. Thanks for your feedback. -
Inappropriate?Thanks for the reply. I really like Slife mainly because it's so simple and I can set things up and don't need to worry about it. The minimum number of work-arounds for any application is optimal. If to understand one activity I need to go and subtract time with another activity (which I need to set up only to understand the first activity correctly) it is one or two steps more than if it were just being included and, not to mention, not as intuitive. Of course, I might be only one of a few people interested in such a feature in which case it's not worth the time.
EMPLOYEE
