Sound is very flat and empty
I experienced a serious sound problem with the actual Spotify client v0.3.6 (revision 28558):
When i play songs that are normally very dynamic and full of bass and drum sounds than these songs sound very very flat and empty in the actual Spotify player.
Even if i turn my notebook to full loudness level it still sounds very flat.
I tested the same songs with my Napster client player and these songs are full of bass and drum sounds there. That proofs that the described problem is not a specific problem with my notebook.
By the way: With my Napster client player i can turn the notebook loudness only to half of the possible loudness level because all songs come very loud and dynamic out of my earphones already at this level.
This flat sound is not acceptable for me as a paying Premium user, so a Spotify player update is needed soon which makes the Spotify music as dynamic and loud as it should be!!!
When i play songs that are normally very dynamic and full of bass and drum sounds than these songs sound very very flat and empty in the actual Spotify player.
Even if i turn my notebook to full loudness level it still sounds very flat.
I tested the same songs with my Napster client player and these songs are full of bass and drum sounds there. That proofs that the described problem is not a specific problem with my notebook.
By the way: With my Napster client player i can turn the notebook loudness only to half of the possible loudness level because all songs come very loud and dynamic out of my earphones already at this level.
This flat sound is not acceptable for me as a paying Premium user, so a Spotify player update is needed soon which makes the Spotify music as dynamic and loud as it should be!!!
72
people have this problem
I have this problem, too!
Tell me when someone solves it.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The company marked this problem solved.
The best solution from the company
-
As very active user, you guys know that we at Spotify is streaming the music at 160kbps Ogg Vorbis q5. We are also doing volume normalization, which right now causes Spotify to have lower volume then other applications.
We are definitely working on how we can do volume normalization better, but for now we can't comment on any details. I talking to developers and will get back here when we have more information.
The company says
this solves the problem
-
Inappropriate?I won't try to discuss whether Spotify delivers good sound or not (I find it acceptable in quality, but not transparent). You might know that Spotify uses Ogg Vorbis -q5 (see the sound quality question). Napster delivers music in WMA with 128 or 192 kpbs and MP3 with 128 or 256 kbps, quite a range of formats and bitrates in other words. This leads to the obvious follow-up question: what format are you playing in your Napster client?
Also, skip the loudness settings for your own sake - it just destroys music :)
I’m amused
-
Inappropriate?I tested it with the streaming Napster music and i think then it is 128 kbps WMA.
The difference in sound quality (loudness and bass) when playing the same music in Napster or in Spotify is so obvious that i could tell you wether the music is played in Napster or in Spotify with closed eyes.
Perhaps Spotify is normalizing all available tracks to the same loudness level which lead to this flat sound experience???
I’m confused
-
Inappropriate?I must agree the quality is not good at all. There is more to quality than what codec used. There quality is empty compared even to radio. Is the quality to be improved? Othervise I will cancel my account!
-
Inappropriate?Same here, I connected the computer to my HK reciver, the sound is not good and I use the Creative SB X-Fi Elite Pro soundcard, so I can't blame the soundcard here. :(
It's not ok to pay for this sound quality. FIX!!!!
I’m sad
-
Inappropriate?I tested Spotify with high-quality headphones (AKG 271 Studio) and the flat Spotify sound is very obvious (compared to e.g. Napster) even with such high-quality sound equipment!
I’m still disappointed
-
Inappropriate?Could you give some examples of tracks where this is particularly noticeable?
-
Two examples:
spotify:track:0atqtaVfMSPikcFpfXIHlF
spotify:track:2FX5fbgWjL3mVLYDexQqeC -
Inappropriate?It is nothing wrong with the base...
Bass Speaker Test - DJ Bass Alliance
http://open.spotify.com/track/2XS7cDc... -
OMG that was really a disturbing track.. i mean the bass is just so!! BASSY. But good example though, there is nothing wrong with the bass.
However you know that you can turn off the volume normalization in the preferences? that should fix it :P -
Inappropriate?I can only agree, the sound quality is much to low to be acceptable for me as a paying customer. It would be a great service if it wasn't for the low sound quality. Will this be fixed? When?
I’m disappointed
-
Inappropriate?Hi! I agree with pellefisk, the sound must be much loader before I can pay for this. Hope it will be fixed soon...
I’m disapointed
-
Inappropriate?wow you really use the words sound quality, notebook and loudness in the same sentence... if anything destyroys sound quality it would be to use loudness on a pair of notebook speakers.... I do agree that the quality could be better but it's good enough for now as far as i am concerned and what i pay for it. Better to add features and expand the music library
-
I am using the Napster music flatrate on the same notebook with the same audio settings and Napster's sound quality in this environment really beats the pants off Spotify!!!
By the way: I don't listen music with the notebook speakers, i am using my AKG 271 Studio high quality headphones! Others are using high-quality audio equipment too and they have reported the same bad sound quality in Spotify compared to other streaming or non-streaming music players! -
well i might have been overly bitter in my comment late last night, i appologise for that unprovoked sarcasm. Still, loudness feature does kill all claims to sound quality since it makes sound sound (?) horrible, i guess that was my main and only point... -
Ok, no problem! May main concern is not the loudness only, but more the missing bass in many rock songs. Try this playlist (spotify:user:akrde:playlist:5RfYmy39cIlqHXyfduTpIs) and tell me if you are satisfied with the bass in these rock songs... -
Inappropriate?Here is the proof that there is something wrong with the sound since version 0.3.0, which was the first Ogg Vorbis version of the Spotify client:
http://www.spotify.com/blog/archives/...
The user mathiaswiberg describes the sound in version 0.3.0 "more hollow now" and he noticed "a big difference" to other music services (iTunes in his case) too!!!
It would be great if the Spotify staff could clarify this problem for us now:
- Why there is so little loudness?
- Why there is so little bass (in rock songs for example)?
- Do you use some kind of loudness normalization and if yes, how is it implemented?
- Do you use a loudness restriction in the Spotify player like some mp3 players have it implemented and if yes, why?
I’m confused
-
Inappropriate?Re: The high quality sound equipment thing, as a rule of thumb, the better your sound equipment, the more the limitations of compressed, lossy formats are exposed.
I'm a bit of an audio quality freak myself, but you know what, for the most part I find Spotify's quality perfectly acceptable for casual listening. Obviously it'd be nice to have the entire catalogue streamed in MP3 V0 but we need to think about what we can reasonably expect in these early stages, no?
I’m just fine tbh
-
Well said! I'm not using Spotiy to hear a needle drop to the floor in a song :) -
@Squizzle:
"Re: The high quality sound equipment thing, as a rule of thumb, the better your sound equipment, the more the limitations of compressed, lossy formats are exposed"
Ok, i just bought 2 Euro headphones from our local vendor intended only for use with Spotify. Thank you for the tip! ;-) -
@yin_yang2k:
Me neither! But as a PREMIUM USER i want a rock song sound like a rock song in Spotify, full of bass, drums and loud and not flat, empty, hollow and muted... -
"Ok, i just bought 2 Euro headphones from our local vendor intended only for use with Spotify. Thank you for the tip! ;-) "
Heh, no need for that, I was just pointing out that "high quality sound equipment" doesn't do favours for compressed audio formats. Your gripes with the service are your own, count me out. -
Heh, it was just a joke, i would never buy such cheap 2 € headphones, because i love my AKG 271 Studio headphones! -
Inappropriate?I personally don't have much problem with the sound quality. But I have a high quality sound card in my computer and not some integrated intel sound chipset. But I guess the main problem is that there isn't an equalizer option in the application, that for one thing would probably increase the quality for the cheaper sound cards out there.
I’m unconcerned
-
Inappropriate?The quality is “ok” but the level is NOT. If I play the same song in WinAmp or MP, the level is dramatically higher than in Spotify. This is a problem for me since my laptops head amp can barely push my in ear headphones (and definitely not my K240S and K601s...). Something is set wrong in some level parameter in the code of Spotify.
I’m ...low...
-
Inappropriate?I agree. I just started to use Spotify and while it's an EXCELLENT service the first thing I noticed was lack of dynamics in the sound. I compared to 192kbps mp3 (same everything; same tunes, same volume level, same computer, same headphones) and the mp3s were clearly better.
So a little less compression is my number one wish. -
Inappropriate?There's nothing wrong with the "quality" or "compression (data), it's the VOLYME of the application itself that's set incorrectly somehow. Luckily, this should be easy to fix...
-
Inappropriate?I agree, the quality is fine but the volume definitely needs to go up.
-
Inappropriate?As very active user, you guys know that we at Spotify is streaming the music at 160kbps Ogg Vorbis q5. We are also doing volume normalization, which right now causes Spotify to have lower volume then other applications.
We are definitely working on how we can do volume normalization better, but for now we can't comment on any details. I talking to developers and will get back here when we have more information.
The company says
this solves the problem
-
Thanks for your reply! Volume normalization and sound quality regarding too little bass/drums needs to be addressed as soon as possible to keep up the good work... -
Nice to hear an official reply. Personally I think the quality is ok, but the volume level is not. I would appreciate a setting where the amount/style of normalization done can be chosen by the user. -
Thanks Carl-Axel! Nice to know that you're working on it. I do feel that the sound is a little too flat and maybe this is due to the volume normalization. I wasn't "spotified" before the volume normalization was introduced. :)
IMHO it's on the bass side of things where most improvements can be done. -
This comment was removed on 11/08/08.
see the change log -
Volume normalization does not destroy music - but using an audio compressor does, imho.
Read about the normalization here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_no... - "Normalization applies the same amount of gain across the selected region of the recording so that the relative dynamics (and signal to noise ratio) are preserved."
As far as I can tell, the problem with Spotify is NOT related to normalization, but to using compressors and perhaps equalization. This is bad, as it alters the original sound.
I for one, will not pay for a service that sounds this bad. On the other hand, I would gladly pay to get unaltered (no compressor, no equalization) music. -
Inappropriate?I'm now aware of the fact that it's due to the normalization process and have already made some comments on the topic on this blog:
http://brendancooper.com/2008/10/21/a...
In short: let the user decide if he/she wants to use this future or not.
Sincerely Jens -
There's another interesting sentence from Brendan's comparison between Spotify, Last.fm and iTunes sound quality: "I’m also minded to think that the bass drum isn’t as defined in the Spotify and Last FM versions as it is in the iTunes version". That's exactly the same impression that i have about many Spotify tracks: too little bass and too little drums!!! -
Inappropriate?I would also like to take the opportunity to suggest an interesting product development for Spotify:
Imagine if DJs could download a DJ version of Spotify that supports audio interfaces with two stereo outputs or more. Could become quite popular I guess.
Personally, I’m waiting for the mobile version... then you’ll rule the planet! -
I don't think any professional DJ would trust a streaming service or even the internet. Just imagine how he would feel when the net connection drops... -
This comment was removed on 01/20/09.
see the change log -
Inappropriate?You could try using SRS Audio Sandbox with Spotify. I don ́t listen to any streaming music without it, especially with my DJ headphones, as dull sound in headphones are horrible. The SRS program simply boosts and enhances the output audio on your PC.
http://open.spotify.com/track/2VFTOmx...
http://open.spotify.com/track/21KN7Qg...
-
Inappropriate?I would like the idea of adding replay gain tags to the metadata of the files instead of normalising them. With a control dialog in the spotify client the user can decide if track/album gain or no gain is applied to the file.
Quality itself is hard to discuss cause it is a very subjective thing. Maybe boosting the quality to q7 will do the job!
I’m sad
-
I think this is already the case and that’s why user preference should be an easy feature to add. To apply a destructive process to the songs sounds like a bad idée since there’s no need for it. -
Inappropriate?I agree with Mattias, the compression is far to great. Being an audiophile 160kbps is not enough, the old LPs I have are much better in terms of quality. Will the quality be improved in the future?
Have you compressed the whole liberay or do you have high quality version of all the tracs? -
Inappropriate?For me, a member of the Swedish Studio Engineering Society (SSES). This is my view after listening through a brand new Mac with AKG 240 headphones that I'm used to mix with.: The sound quality is acceptable for background music but slightly to low for me to become totally addicted to spotify. I can hear unclarity mostly in the high end treble area. For the mid and bass I think it sounds ok.
-
Are you sure that for the BASS it sounds ok? Try some rock songs and you will experience that they sound very flat in bass and drum sounds, do you? Not acceptable for me... -
Inappropriate?as the simple man i am i dont mind at all the normalization or the quality, but, the level should be alot higher
-
Inappropriate?If you think that the level needs to go up, then you do care about the lack of option to turn "normalization" (the lowering of gain on high RMS songs compared to low RMS songs) off.
-
true, in fact i dont want to have to change volume between songs, so one hand the normalization is good, but i want it to be at a higher level so my event sounds wont blow my speakers :) -
That’s the problem. You can’t get both at the same time. Volume “normalization” can only bring the high RMS song down in level and not the other way around (unless you apply compression and limiting but then you alter the sound of the songs). The only way to go is to let the user decide if they want to use it or not.
http://brendancooper.com/2008/10/21/a... -
Inappropriate?Have no problem with the dynamics of the sound, it's just very low compared to other sounding applications.
I’m frustrated
-
Inappropriate?It would be nice if an employee could tell us about the progress regarding this issue (low level due to "normalization” and the lack of option to turn it of).
-
Inappropriate?If you want to get the best possible quality from your soundcard, you need to feed the DA-converter with a unity gain signal (full level) since you don’t use all the bits if you lower the level in the digital domain. If the level from Spotify is at -12dB, you’ll end up listening to music with 14 bits resolution instead of 16 bits and this means higher noise and THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) levels. A user option to turn it off is the only way to go and it should be a simple thing to add so I really don’t understand why no one is responding to our request. I’ve recommended Spotify to a lot of people and many of them has had complaints about the quality but it’s always the level difference compared to other players that makes them think that the quality of Spotify is bad.
Spotify team:
Pleas add a tick box for “Equal loudness playback” that can be unchecked! -
Inappropriate?For me the problem was solved by adding a good software equalizer. (Adding stuff to an arbitrary audio stream is easy in Linux, but probably not so in Windows.)
After this the sound quality is good enough to my ears. I even A/Bed Spotify and Audacious w/o other effects, using monitor headphones from my studio (Sennheiser HD280 Pro and AKG K240). Not that much of a difference to be upset about it.
I hope you won't add any effects to the audio stream like other music services appears to be doing. That would surely spoil the fun for the "audiophiles". Many people would probably be happy with a good built-in equalizer though. -
"For me the problem was solved by adding a good software equalizer"
Let's be honest here: adding a software equalizer to make the flat Spotify sound more powerful is just a WORKAROUND and not really a SOLUTION for all Spotify users, isn't it? -
Excellent! In Windows this can be done with Breakaway multiband compressor, it just adds to the final end off the audio stage before windows feeds the sound card.
See my post lower down on this page. :) -
Inappropriate?This isn't really a problem with Spotify, its a problem with some computers having poor sound amplification. I use an external amplifier for my headphones and sound quality overall is much better than other web-based music services (thanks to ogg vorbis). I have no problems turning up the volume to a level where my ears will fall apart.
-
For your information, I have tried Spotify with three different soundcards (Digidesign M-Box mini, Edirol UX-25EX and Native instruments Session I/O) and none of these can power my cans to a sufficient level when using Spotify due to the lower level from the application. Because of this, I rarely use Spotify when working on my laptop, and when I use it with my stereo it still feels stupid not to utilize the full potential of the DA-converters on the soundcard:
http://brendancooper.com/2008/10/21/a...
This problem is fortunately very easy to address and I’m surprised that the Spotify team hasn’t responded to the suggestion to let the user decide if he/she wants to use level “normalization” or not. This problem will be more serious when Spotify goes mobile since many cellular phones have insufficient power from the headphone amp to power anything else than cheap plugs. -
"This problem is fortunately very easy to address and I’m surprised that the Spotify team hasn’t responded to the suggestion to let the user decide if he/she wants to use level “normalization” or not"
If the Spotify team has normalized all tracks with decoding and re-encoding each track than they can't go back anymore...perhaps that's the reason why they aren't doing anything to solve this problem at the moment??? -
They haven’t applied a destructive process (unless they are stupid...). The way it works is that when you convert a track to a format you also analyze the average RMS level and implant that information to the file. The player then reads this information and adjusts (lower) the playback level for songs with a high RMS value compared with a song with a lower value. The only thing they need to do is to provide the user with a checkbox named “Constant playback level” (or similar) that can be unchecked, PLEASE! -
Inappropriate?I thing the quality has improved some since this tread started, but it's not a problem with the amplification, or anyway not only, have a 3000$ hifi stereo so that should not be the problem, I simply thing your have lover expectaions Skom..
-
Inappropriate?Please add the possibility to remove the normalization and also add an EQ, then it would probably be much better for many of us that think this is a BIG problem.
-
Inappropriate?Still no reply from Spotify regarding the “level” issue. I’ve sent an email on the 4th of November but still no reply. I’m starting to think that maybe they HAVE done the foolish mistake of normalizing the tracks destructively (but I don’t think that they are that stupid). Still a mystery that they don’t want to at least comment on whether or not they are planning to add a user selectable option for this.
-
Commenting on what's on its way makes people go into hype-mode, raising expectations to the point where everyone is expecting a kitchen sink, and then some.
When they then deliver what they originally said they would, they get booed off stage for not doing more.
Business/marketing 101: Set the expectations low and overdeliver (i.e., "We're working on a solution. We can't give any details right now" and then have normalization be optional, along with an EQ, introducing vinyl scratch noise to the stream, fireworks, 5.1 concerts and what not.)
They don't talk all that much about what's coming for the simple reason that they want positive results when they unleash a massive update.
Normally (i.e., 99.99% of the time), when someone not under NDA contacts a company, they get a very generic message with way too many words and not nearly enough content.
Be glad that you know that they're even looking at how they can improve things.
No amount of complaining about how "tardy" Spotify are, or asking for updates every week will get it released faster. -
Business/marketing 101: Never ignore emails even if you have bad or no news to the client. -
The thing is, you'd be at least as pissed off as you are now (probably more) if you were directed towards this thread to keep an eye out for future updates.
They have this are on GS to be as transparent as they currently are, and while they most certainly could be better at it (every company could), they're doing a pretty good job so far.
You'd probably get better results talking directly to Andres, whose job seems to be scouring GS for anything Spotify-related -- but like I said, you'd probably just be sent back to this thread. -
Inappropriate?First of all, I’m not ”pissed off” (yet...:), and any reply is better than no reply since you at least know that they got the message.
-
Yeah, but your frustration is clearly showing ;)
And hey, don't we all want clearer sound?
Short of telling us exactly what they're doing (which they won't), they can only say what Carl-Axel said earlier in the thread, namely:
We are definitely working on how we can do volume normalization better, but for now we can't comment on any details. I talking to developers and will get back here when we have more information.
Remember that his reply is only a month old, and while it may seem like forever in internet time, it's no time at all for a company that's just gone into public beta -- something they wanted to do roughly a year ago.
Talk to Andres and I'm sure he'll at least look into it :P -
Agreed, I guess the option will show up in the next update. I hope they include a description of what the function does so that people understands the benefits and limitations of this technology. -
Hi Jens,
Sorry for the delay in response, we're not ignoring the issue it's simply that at this time I have nothing new to report. There are a lot of factors that are involved in any changes to the music but I can assure that this is an active topic of conversation internally but other than that I can't say much more.
As for contacting Spotify, in the future it's better to email us directly rather than use the "Report Bugs" feature in Spotify. -
Nice to hear. I guess I don’t need to worry that you have processed the songs destructively regarding level ;) -
Inappropriate?I haven't read all the replies, and if this has been said somewhere else, I apologize, but you're comparing Spotify that does ogg with napster that uses mp3? Since mp3 is a flat stream you have an Equalizer that enhances the sound and gives it bass..etc.. that's how mp3 music is supposed to be, while ogg delivers with the musics studio recorded eq settings, right now, there's no equalizer settings to change in spotify, so it'll play everything "normally" which may see flat to you, if you're used to an EQ with "rock" or something (like on winamp).
If you have an ok soundcard it should also have a built in eq setting in the options, try changing that and see if you "hear" any diffrence, because frankly .. that Iron Maiden song you showed as an example, if I put the original disc into my computer and play it in winamp and turn off the EQ it sounds the same, *shrug* -
What?
There is nothing “wrong” with the quality of the stream except that the volume is to low due to the “normalization”. That’s it. -
Inappropriate?Just to clarify what I mean, the song you linked to from Maiden is from 1981, I wouldn't expect that to sound less flat unless it was a remaster, for example:
http://open.spotify.com/track/1Dk5dX4...
This is Iron Maiden - For the greater good of god .. it's recorded in 05 or 06 (released in 06), and it sounds completly diffrent then what you linked to.. -
Inappropriate?Just got Spotify Premium and I must say that the sound is indeeed dead. There is no power in it, no bass, very low sound. As most of you describe, flat, hollow.
And then I am using high end sound card (X-Fi) and high end sound system. Even 128kbps MP3s sounds better then this.
The sound quality appears to be fine but the volumes are seriosly messed up. It sounds weak even if I turn the sound up very loud. And this comes to ALL the music I've tested in spotify so far, it's not just some songs.
I'm looking forward for a solution to this because Spotify is not acceptable for me at the moment.
I’m dissapointed
-
On the other hand, it sounds great on both my Macbook and my Logitech Z-5500s, other than the normalization. No problem with bass/oomph (just ask my downstairs neighbour), and if you think 128Kbps MP3s sound better.. well, I'll have what you're having.
Wait and see what this threads results in, and if you still think it sounds flat/dead/un-hip, notify Spotify.
As it is right now, they've said that they are working on a solution, and that's good enough for the time being. -
"Just got Spotify Premium and I must say that the sound is indeeed dead. There is no power in it, no bass, very low sound. As most of you describe, flat, hollow.
And then I am using high end sound card (X-Fi) and high end sound system. Even 128kbps MP3s sounds better then this."
I think you are dead wrong... -
"Just got Spotify Premium and I must say that the sound is indeeed dead. There is no power in it, no bass, very low sound. As most of you describe, flat, hollow.
And then I am using high end sound card (X-Fi) and high end sound system. Even 128kbps MP3s sounds better then this."
Well on my systems sound quality is excellent in every aspect, just like you'd expect an ogg stream to be. That proves the sound quality as delivered from Spotify is excellent and the problem you are experiencing is to be found in your end of the chain. Most likely there is a problem with your amplifier not being able to amplify the slightly-lower-than-average-level signal from Spotify to the level you desire.
I agree that Spotify should add an option to compensate for this since several users are experiencing this problem, but that is really compensating for poor hardware on the user side, not improving audio quality because Spotify sound quality is already superior to the other music services. -
Excellent comment, Pierre! -
This is the last time I write about this...
When “volume normalization” is used, songs with a high RMS-level (usually modern songs due to heavy compression (NOT mp3 etc.) and limiting) are played back at a lower gain setting by the application in order to reduce the perceived level difference between the tracks. The idée is good but the problem is that you really don’t want to adjust the playback level in the digital domain since you effectively lose resolution (bits) and increase THD+N values. Who wants to listen to a 14bit audio stream with noise and distortion levels at -78dB instead of 16 bits and THD+N @ -90dB if they don’t have to? Another bigger problem is that some combinations of headphones and amplifiers will not be powered enough due to the lack of head amp power in combination with the lower output gain of Spotify. The third issue is the terrible experience of another application (like an internet side) that suddenly starts to play something more than twice as loud as Spotify (witch you might listen to at a fairly high level already...). I don’t know about the level of the commercials in Spotify since I am a paying customer but I have seen other people complaining about the level of the spots relative to the music and maybe the basic issue is related to all this. -
Inappropriate?Listen to what Jens said he explains it all.
-
Even better would be if Spotify could just close this thread to deal with all the whiners who can't be bothered to read for more than five seconds, thus making sure that more complaints are added weekly (if not daily), when Spotify have already said that they're working on a solution.
But then again, I'm just a grumpy old man, so what do I know? :-P -
Inappropriate?Look into using Breakaway multiband compressor to boost the audio quality of all music on your computer. It does normalizing and fixes levels, gives boost to the bass and opens up the high-end. I've been using it for a while and it really makes a difference! Spotify could maybe consider running some sort of compressor in the software. Why not licence breakaway and include it in the player. That would be cool!
Anyway, I recommend trying breakaway.(and i have no affil. with them any way) it's here: http://www.claessonedwards.com/winmor...
-
Yes, why not license something for the Windows platform, ignoring the Mac users altogether?
Actually, come to think about it, why not?
Go ahead and ruin the audio quality for the Windows users and give us Mac users the simple choice of not doing normalization. -
I just got an email about your response, but it isn't showing up here, but I'll address it anyway :P
The problem isn't so much that you found a workaround, as the fact that it's not viable (30 bucks licensing cost) and platform-specific, when the real solution is to have normalization be optional.
I still wouldn't mind higher quality files though, but that's a different discussion entirely ;) -
Lucky i have my post in the copy buffer:
"Well Oscar, I guess the best thing would be to start off with a better quality. However there is an audio enhancer in iTunes for example, that helps a little bit. Something similar to this would be nice to have in the software itself. I would assume this could be made platform-independent, and work for the mac users as well. Well, for the Windows users at least, Breakaway is a workaround until the issue is solved. Maybe there is a similar product available for Mac as well."
I agree with your points. I'm sure they will sort it out. Breakaway can be used free for 30 days, after that it bypasses every hour or so, so you have to turn it back on. So at least it's free to try. And like i said in another reply a bit further down, i think the quality will improve with time. Anyway this is a nice discussion. -
Inappropriate?Storm in a teacup, anyone?
You ́re discussing bad/flat sound on computers... Simple solution: BUY the music! Either on CD or better off, on vinyl. End of !@#$ story... -
Because a CD is not as digital as a Ogg/Wav/Mp3/Flac file? Right..
The problem is not the medium - it's the normalization.
While vinyl does give a very, very nice and living sound, I haven't encountered any 500 song records with the ability to skip between songs easily, randomize the play order or, you know, not slowly ruining the quality for subsequent plays.
Some of us simply aren't interested in obsolete mediums, no matter how good the quality is.
Since you, my good Sir, are the only one to bring hostilities into this otherwise fairly civilized thread, I can only express my wishes about GS allowing the use of Skype emoticons, if only so I could reply with a simple (finger) instead of this lengthy piece of annoying text. -
Well, Mathias... :) Most of the, at least modern, music originated from computers in the first place. It's true that the CD is not compressed, and that Vinyl has excellent dynamics. However we are discussing the future of music services here, and the specific problems with streaming services and compression which makes your comment slightly beside the point. Oscar, as you said this is a civilized thread so let's keep the fingers out of it. Again, it needs to be said: Spotify is an excellent service, and completely the way to go. It made me re-discover my love for music. It's convenient, legal and fair. The quality will improve as the service matures. -
@mrgnome: bingo.
Purchasing CDs or vinyl is as much of a solution to this problem as buying a scanner is a solution to taking photos of people.
Neither solution is feasible for the given demographics. -
...or complaining about digital noise on from digital camera CMOS Sensors and suggesting old ISO100 film ;) -
Inappropriate?I’m having a hard time understanding why this is so hard for people to understand?
We (me at least) DO NOT consider the quality of the stream bad when it comes to compression (data, ogg). All we are saying is that the output level of the application is lower than others (gain in digital domain) due to the “level normalization” and with it comes pros and cons. The option for the user to decide for them self whether to use “normalization” or not, is what we are requesting. We (me at least) are not interested in EQ’s compressors or other sound shaping tools, we just want to be able to get normal (full) level from the software.
If you agree, use the “I have this problem to”-button. If not, give us some arguments.
1 person says
this solves the problem
-
...and by the way; vinyl has a poor dynamic range compared to other media but people are confusing the media with the content. Older music was not exposed to “the level war” and is less compressed then newer music (on CD...). -
Inappropriate?Yes. However, there is a slight difference in the music sounding "flat" and just having an over all low level. From my experience every kind of compression makes the dymanic properties of music worse, and makes them loose some life. The reason I like the multiband compressor is that it seems to restore some of these aspects, as well as normalize the sound to near clipping levels, thus maxing everything out. It's true that some sound shaping occurs, and you have to dial it in to suit your taste. I guess it's all about taste really. But I agree with you Jens, the bottom problem is just the normalization level.
-
Inappropriate?I agree with you that the the very low volume level of the Spotify player has to be solved first.
And it has to be solved by Spotify themself and not with any thirdparty audio enhancers!!!
After solving this problem we will see if the sound is still flat and empty...
I’m still frustrated about the low volume level
-
Inappropriate?The sound from Spotify is flat and empty. But this can be changed!
Because Spotify is the future! ;) -
Inappropriate?Spotify needs to add a preamp. Normalizing with ReplayGain is good, but as people have noticed, it makes the volume universally too low. In my Foobar2000 I use +10 dB preamp. ReplayGain normalizes all the music to the same (low) level, and the preamp raises the volume to my preferred loudness.
-
Inappropriate?I’m getting really tired of all the reply’s that suggests that a compressor/preamp/gain-thingy-whatever will cure this problem!
THE ONLY THING that will solve this issue is to give the user the option to turn the feature off, NOTHING ELSE!
So in the future, please; If you think that the level of Spotify is to low or you are bothered with the reduced playback quality this results in (bits, THD and noise floor), then use the “I have this problem to” or write something if you have to but NO MORE suggestions that only proves to the rest of us that you do not understand the cause of the problem.
...and I’m sorry of I offended someone... -
Yes, I totally agree.
It is much better to remove the problem than trying to repair it. This especially applies to audio - if the sound is modified/compressed/distorted, you should not try to undo it. That is not possible. Just switch off the thing that causes these problems, and you're good to go.
Do you hear us, Spotify Team? :) -
Inappropriate?The sound quality isn't good enough. If you have a decent sound system, you could easily hear it.
I.e. Norah Jones - Not too late album, wich is very dynamic and good sounding in the first place, doesn't sound very good with spotify.
I see some complaints about the volume. Well... it depends how you see it. If higher volume is gained via more compression, it will reduce quality (dynamics) even more. If volume is gained via "replaygain", it would solve the problem without distorting the sound even more.
I have a suspicion that most users are "too used to" the music business loudness war. And when something is played back at "normal" gain, they complain aobut too low levels. Those users should be "detoxing" from the loudness war and start to listen to music as it should be listened to (and was before the loudness war started). In other words: Use the volume button on your stereo/speakers. On big headphones, you CAN'T normally get high volume from a small laptop for instance without reducing sound quality/dynamics, or use an small headphone amplifier.
I hope you will focus more on quality. If you do, spotify WILL be biggest digital audio revolution since mp3. It's almost the only thing that's missing for it to be perfect! :)
It's very easy to get addicted the music industry's loud mastering, and therefor even more important to understand the problem.
If you don't understand this, please catch up:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Gmex_...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness...
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/stor... -
Judging by your post, you do not understand the problem regarding the low playback level form Spotify. -
Inappropriate?I'm really sorry. I suddenly got painfully aware of the real problem... hehe.
I'm letting the previous post stay anyway, since it's kinda related anyway?
If not, a moderator is very free to remove it :P
I’m silly
-
No worries, you’re not alone.
/Jens -
Inappropriate?Please please please Spotify, please provide an option to disable the normalization.
As others have noted, normalization based on the RMS of a wide range of sources will basically lower the number of bits used for the tracks with an over average RMS, which will in turn increase the noise floor when people adjust their amplifiers to compensate (not to mention all the people who are maxing their sound card amplifiers already and don't have that option).
If it's punch and power for your advertisements you want, just compress/limit the hell out of them and I can assure you they will cut through the music -- radio stations are doing this every day (and they usually compress the whole stream, including the music, so you would even have and advantage here since you, hopefully, don't compress our precious audio material).
As for paying users the advertisement argument is effectivly moot, so there I see absolutely no reason not to provide that check-box, unless you actually did destructively process the audio files.
Please consider these arguments, and if you have the time comment on them that would be an added bonus :)
Thanks!
I’m surprised that this hasn't been fixed by now
-
I’m so happy that there’s another person on this forum that speaks my language!
A warm welcome to you Torarnv. -
This comment was removed on 01/20/09.
see the change log -
Inappropriate?Not only do you have the same idea I hade regarding a nice, easy to understand explanation to include in the app but you actually made it!!!
My hat goes off for you!
The only small detail I would change is the part “some are raised” since this is not the case (peaks would clip since they are at 0 dBDF (or very close to 0) even in the RMS-level is low.
So, Spotify: This is how you do it... PLEASE! -
Thanks Jens! You are right about the raising of volume, I realized the mistake myself just after going to bed.
Here's an updated visual guide:

Hope the image hosting stays up.
Thanks to ImageShack for Free Image Hosting -
@torarnv: great stuff. While I had a pretty good grasp of the problem (i.e., not wanting to create something from nothing etc.) earlier, the visual guide cemented it.
The only think that confuses me is that your checkbox looks strange!
That's definitely not how it looks on MY system... just kidding ;-)
It would be really good if we could get an update though, as it's been three months from the start, and two months since Carl-Axel said he'd get back to us. -
@torarnv: great stuff. While I had a pretty good grasp of the problem (i.e., not wanting to create something from nothing etc.) earlier, the visual guide cemented it.
The only think that confuses me is that your checkbox looks strange!
That's definitely not how it looks on MY system... just kidding ;-)
It would be really good if we could get an update though, as it's been three months from the start, and two months since Carl-Axel said he'd get back to us. -
@torarnv: Nice visual guide. Gratz!! -
Inappropriate?The output level is way to low. It's almost impossible to use headphones connected to the computer when using Spotify. It's a pitty cause it comes quite handy when travelling around as I do.
Please look in to this matter!
I’m Concerned
-
Inappropriate?Hi Guys
I have some new info from our developers and we would like some feedback for a modified Spotify version. The modifications are related to Spotify’s volume and sound.
I would like to have 20 people (first come first serve) participate in this test and provide us with feedback about this version. So if you're interested please add your username as a comment to this post to participate.
You will be contacted when we are ready for the test and feedback. -
rylin -
I'd like to participate please (icStatic). -
Yes please (mathewjm) -
I'd be happy to help out too :-) (stevecarpenter) -
Perfect Carl-Axel, thanks a bunch for following up on this! :)
My username is "torarnv"
Also, I'm pretty sure Jens would like to participate, but I don't know his username. -
Username: Musikälskaren -
akrde -
aslanix -
incoherent -
StiffenStorm -
macf13nd -
teppic -
teppic -
Fewmanchu -
TwinOak -
voz -
Thanks guys, We will not add any more to this test. I'll get back to this post when we are ready. -
I'd like to participate as well. A bit late(?), but here's hoping that being # 16 of the announced 20 participants is close enough... ;)
My Spotify username: thebart -
jenseklund -
Carl-Axel:
Sorry I’m a bit late but perhaps you could invite me too since I’m... how should I say, involved?
Also, I would like to show my gratitude to you guys for listening to us! -
@Carl-Axel
I'd like to echo Jens' request to be included in the test panel. He's had a vital role in describing the problem, and should be the perfect candidate for evaluating a possible solution.
He was also #17 to sign up, out of 20 spots :) -
Definitely agree with torarnv and Jens here. While he may be late to the party, he was named earlier, and his feedback would be invaluable.
Not to mention the 20 spots aren't filled ;)
If you can't squeeze him in, I'll gladly sacrifice my spot for him.
While I do have a very nice pair of ears, I have a feeling Jens' equipment and experience is a tad more accurate when it comes to identifying the most correct sound ;) -
Thanks everyone who left their names. We will try and include everyone in the testing but we do have enough people at this point. You'll be contact in a short while with more details. -
user:Goofy -
This reply was removed on 01/20/09.
see the change log -
Inappropriate?I definitley agree with Jens and tornarv above, the normalisation feature should be optional!
As a musician with music on Spotify, studio owner and producer I hope that I have credibiliy to say that, apart from being annoying when listening with equipment made for listening to music (i.e. NOT notebook speakers and such), any normalisation or dynamics-altering is directly damaging to the original musical idea. Both inter track-dynamics and the level between tracks on an album is carefully chosen by the producer to maximize the experience for the listener.
By all means, keep the normalization feature. I would even go as far as to say you should add a compressor also, the more these kind of functions moves to the user level, the less compression is needed in the production stage.
But still, not without the ability to choose if you want it or not, allowing those who can and want to enjoy the original dynamics of the music to do so and those who don't won't have to. -
Inappropriate?Carl-Axl: I am a premium member. Great new music service, but read this. If I would currently be able to choose between MusicGiants (http://www.musicgiants.com/musicgiant...) and Spotify (http://www.spotify.com) I would NOT choose Spotify! The only reason for going with Spotify is that MusicGiants is not availble outside the U.S. People that love music, love the emotions contained within the music. All these emotions are removed and lost when you degrade the sound quality. At least implement an option in the settings where you can choose uncompressed WAV as the streaming format. Then users of all bandwidths and audio quality preferences are able to choose. That would make your service survive in the long term... Thanks!
-
WAV is around 12Mbps -- most people can't handle that, plus it would incur hefty fees for the Spotify platform (since, you know, they have to store every song on their servers in whatever format(s) the end users get to listen to).
We (i.e. some of us in the community) are hoping for FLAC support some time in the future.
FLAC is a lossless codec with bit rates much lower than those of WAV.
See http://getsatisfaction.com/spotify/to... for the discussion on that topic.
In the end though, I don't think it makes much sense to offer uncompressed music if only (or even less than) one percent of the customer base can make use of it.
Don't get me wrong though; I have the bandwidth for it and would love to see FLAC in Spotify, but I just don't see it happening in the foreseeable future. -
Inappropriate?Oscar, I understand your point. I would easily pay twice as much per month if I would be serviced with lossless audio. There will be significant competition within this business domain very soon. People can live with a short buffer latency before each lossless tune is played. How to realise the bandwidth and storage needs for being able to stream lossless is a challenge for Spotify worth a lot for them to think about. Now Spotify has the chance of taking this service to where it needs to be and really win the race.
1 person says
this solves the problem
-
Aye, I'm with you all the way :)
Double the cost for FLAC would be money well spent, but I strongly believe we're in the minority -- I think it's great they managed to get people to pony up just to have ads removed, and I hope more premium differentiators are on the way (higher quality, smart playlists etc.).
I believe the most economical way for them to handle the increased distribution costs would be inexpensive on-demand cache servers located in the ISPs' networks. That way, the ISPs' cost comes down a lot as they only need to stream a song a few times a month, and Spotify only needs to send a song to each ISP a few times.
A side benefit of that is the ISPs could transmit at full speed within their own network at virtually no cost, which would be great for our bandwidth impaired friends in the UK, US, Australia etc. -
Inappropriate?By going mobile they clearly address the users' needs, that's good. The next step must be to really focus on the quality and invite ALL users to this service. The audio quality discussion related to Spotify should be eliminated once and for all. Just think about the significant marketing advantages that would create: "We deliver music wherever you are, the way you really want it." :)
-
Inappropriate?Oscar, I totally agree! Great points! :)
-
Inappropriate?Well, I don't think it's possible to stream wav och lossless because of limited bandwith. But I'm pretty sure that there will be possibilities in the future to increase the bitrate and perhaps even supply a lossless alternative. But I guess the record companies has one or two things to say about that.
I don't know what format Spotify uses to store the music, but since they have changed the streaming format one time it should be a lossless format. I really hope so. Then it's pretty easy to increase the bitrate when the bandwith is available, if the record companies can accept it.
At the moment the biggest problem with the sound quality on Spotify is not the bitrate but the normalization feature. But I know they are working on it. I hope they will give us the possibility to disable it completly.
But I would be very happy with a higher bitrate, but I don't think it's possible at this point. -
There's a beta running over the weekend with different sound characteristics (see http://getsatisfaction.com/spotify/to... ). So far, I'm liking it a lot, and I wouldn't be too surprised to see some of the changes flow out into the normal client fairly soon.. at least I'm hoping they will, but they did say they were only testing atm. -
Inappropriate?I have now been doing some catching up by reading through this entire post .. and I have thereby also realized that I do not need to add another comment regarding these sound issues :)
BUT i am very curious about this beta test for the "lucky" 20 people. What's up with that? Could you test-guys give us some feedback of what is being tested, changed? Have ya'll received any beta version yet? Im just curious.
I’m happy
-
We asked the testers not to comment right away but some of the changes they tried are likely to make it in a future release. -
Inappropriate?I agree it sounds flat. For a fair comparison, I listened to Franz Ferdinand's new album both on mp3 at the same bit-rate and on spotify, and I have to say there was more clarity on the mp3s, even when I adjusted the two applications to the same volume. On the mp3 the attack of the individual instruments stood out. Can anyone record the output from their sound card and post the sound waves comparing CD, mp3, and spotify? Because I suspect Spotify have compressed (as in increased the loudness) the sound, which is why everything sounds washed out.
I’m undecided
-
Inappropriate?Seems the update is out, and the features we tested are included. Sweet!
I wish to thank the entire Spotify team for listing to us, and for resolving this issue in a very good way.
Keep up the good work!
I’m happy
3 people say
this solves the problem
-
Inappropriate?The fact you can turn it off now in options,.. sort of works like a charm :P
-
Inappropriate?We've added the option to disable volume normalization in Spotify, it's available in the preferences. We'll have a little more information on the blog in a short while. Hopefully this helps improve the sound quality for those who want to disable it.
1 person says
this solves the problem
-
Much better :D -
Much better :D -
Thank you very much! -
Inappropriate?This doesn't help at all! I still can't hear a thing. I got a loud beep when entering the wrong password at the login screen but once I'm logged in and starts playing the music the volume is gone. Even though my volume is turned up to maximum. I'm having this problem only on my work computer that uses xp 64mb on my home computer that uses Vista 32mb there's no problem. I've tried turning off normalization but i makes no difference!
I’m frustrated
-
You know, sometimes on enterprise computers they remove soundcards to make the employees work more efficient so maybe that's why it doesn't work for you. -
Inappropriate?Yes, I'm famliliar with that but that's hardly the issue here. The sound is fine in every other application and I'm not hte only one listening to music on my computer. the sound was perfectly fine in spotify until maybe one or two moths ago. Besides my employer don't mind us listening to music.. When sitting in an open office landscape the option of listening to music in headphones actually helps concentration since it blocks out other souinds.
Loading Profile...












EMPLOYEE






EMPLOYEE

