Loading Profile...
Why is the playlist size so limited ?
I recently joined Spotify and am somewhat dissappointed with the restriction in playlist size - I just want one playlist with all my prefferred music but it won't let me add any more to the list - I'd guess I need up to around 100,000 entries.
If I pay for a premium account will I be able to add more ?
Also if I pay for a premium account will I get tracks by (the real) Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd and the Beatles ?
If I pay for a premium account will I be able to add more ?
Also if I pay for a premium account will I get tracks by (the real) Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd and the Beatles ?
I’m underwhelmed
1
person has this question
I have this question, too!
Tell me when someone answers.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who ask this question, the more it gets noticed.
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
-
Inappropriate?Given an average of 3 minutes per song, 100000 tracks represents 208 days of continuous listening. Ar you sure you need more music than that in a playlist? ;)
Apart from that, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd and the Beatles all refuse to license their music to Spotify (see http://www.spotify.com/en/help/faq/#m...). Vote with your listening habits and stop listening to their music! That's what I've done.
I’m amused
1 Comment
Add a comment
This answers the question
-
Well I like a wide selection on random play - I like to specify the selection but have a wide range played back and under 10,000 is a little limited - 100,000 was a bit of an exageration probably around 30,000 would easily be enough :)
I'd love to know why The Beatles, Led Zep and Pink Floyd (among others) have refused to allow tracks on Spotify when they do allow tracks on Jango. -
Inappropriate?The size is limited mainly because having lists of 100k and over are a big strain on our servers. Most users have much less in their lists.1 Comment Add a comment
This answers the question
-
There's a simple fix for that - add the option for user's playlists to be stored on their local machine instead of on Spotify servers - that way the lists could be any size at all and the strain on the servers would actually be less than it is now - obviously that needs to be optional since it would mean each user would have to have separate playlists on separate systems.
-
Inappropriate?The option does not excist in mac version.
Besides.. that kinda loses the point of the playlists then.
If I only can have them on my computer..and not use them on an other computer or share them... -
Inappropriate?"...lists of 100k and over are a big strain on our servers..." ???
How does this compare to last.fm?
Last.Fm has tons of Afropop music, where others had little to none. They (last.fm) seem to be a current gold standard for breadth. What is the angle and purpose for copying these music services ad nauseum? Not that I care for Last.fm all that much; I came here to find something better. What will make Spotify betters? And, why would people move lists between Last.fm and Spotify?
EMPLOYEE
