Loading Profile...
assigning contacts to messages (or vice versa)
I don't know if this exists, thats why I am writing here. when I forward a message from my phone to the site, I want it to be categorized under one of my contacts if they are already in my contacts list. Is there a certain code I need to include with the forwarded message to let TMT.com know that I want it to be grouped under a contacts messages?I know you already have it so that you can do the "f:number" thing but I don't really remember peoples numbers now that I carry a cell phone, so it would be more helpful if by using some sort of de-limiter/code you could signify which contact that messages belongs to for example "John Doe"+message would put the message under John Doe or something like that (using first name, full name, initals, etc)
I’m excited
2
people like this idea
I like this idea!
Tell me when this idea gets some attention.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The company has this in progress.
Create a customer community for your own organization
Plans starting at $19/month
-
Inappropriate?We'll replace the 'John Doe - Message' shortcut to replace the unusable 'f:+12123123123 - Message' shortcut.
I’m excited
-
Inappropriate?Hey guys, thank you both for taking a look and responding so quickly. I have another suggestions related to this- maybe it should also be allowed to assign contacts nicknames or aliases- this way if you have a nickname or alias for that contact you won't have to put their full name in with the forwarded text so that it is assigned to that contact. This way if you have two contacts named John, but you call one of them Johnny, you would only need to put "Johnny" in. This way you can link messages to contacts with only one identifier instead of two (first and last name). Just another suggestion. even if this is not possible, I thank you for considering the first idea which would be useful on its own.
I’m excited
-
Inappropriate?Also, I think the number option should still be in there- not necessarily replaced by name. I just think doing it by name should be an option. some people might feel that the number way is better. (just an observation)
I’m excited
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
