Twitter spam mitigation via SURBL applied to young Follow ratio inequity accounts
Concept:
Twitter spam mitigation via SURBL applied to young Follow ratio inequity accounts
Synopsis:
Twitter should use SURBL checking against all published URL pushed by early life accounts for 90 days where a Follower to Following ratio is greater than ~100:1 as part of building a minor reputation score.
Details:
Based on what I have noticed since being on the service, there are a lot of spammer and developer possibilities right now. As Twitter operations and devel hooks have cranked down on certain areas there has been gravitation to other exploits or testing of the system.
A typical spammer account has the following characteristics:
1) < 10 followers with auto follow NOT selected
2) following +1000
3) +1 post with a obvious SURBL hit i.e. a spamvertized URL
4) Less than 90 days old
Considering how Blogger has dealt with these issues and other form based services, Twitter should use SURBL filters.
Proliferation:
Of course, obfuscation via shorter URL services might crop up overnight but these are also easily tracked in the XMPP aggregate to a manageable level. Consider that 100 new accounts of the form {girlname}{bigint} are likely not real people, are bots, and bots bent on spamvertising a single URL.
Secondarily, as with any emerging reputation system there will be shill creation and shill for hire if a follower reputation is created based on auto-follow classification.
Third, it is likely that any internal algorithm will eventually be gamed as the corpus of user creation maps to larger and more automated applications. 90 days is a sliding scale that will require tuning.
Afterword and Suggestions
While I appreciate the effect of growing net new accounts for Twitter via bot techniques of spammers -- it starts to feel like Blogger. I'd like to suggest that Twitter consider
a) SURBL implementation guided by community inputs and tempered by anti-spam leaders
b) shortly thereafter ratify or endorse a SURBL compliant (stated) URL shortening service
Conclusion
Enforcing reputation and checks against SURBL removes a key vector being used by these namespace and follow approaches by the current run of spammers on Twitter.
Twitter spam mitigation via SURBL applied to young Follow ratio inequity accounts
Synopsis:
Twitter should use SURBL checking against all published URL pushed by early life accounts for 90 days where a Follower to Following ratio is greater than ~100:1 as part of building a minor reputation score.
Details:
Based on what I have noticed since being on the service, there are a lot of spammer and developer possibilities right now. As Twitter operations and devel hooks have cranked down on certain areas there has been gravitation to other exploits or testing of the system.
A typical spammer account has the following characteristics:
1) < 10 followers with auto follow NOT selected
2) following +1000
3) +1 post with a obvious SURBL hit i.e. a spamvertized URL
4) Less than 90 days old
Considering how Blogger has dealt with these issues and other form based services, Twitter should use SURBL filters.
Proliferation:
Of course, obfuscation via shorter URL services might crop up overnight but these are also easily tracked in the XMPP aggregate to a manageable level. Consider that 100 new accounts of the form {girlname}{bigint} are likely not real people, are bots, and bots bent on spamvertising a single URL.
Secondarily, as with any emerging reputation system there will be shill creation and shill for hire if a follower reputation is created based on auto-follow classification.
Third, it is likely that any internal algorithm will eventually be gamed as the corpus of user creation maps to larger and more automated applications. 90 days is a sliding scale that will require tuning.
Afterword and Suggestions
While I appreciate the effect of growing net new accounts for Twitter via bot techniques of spammers -- it starts to feel like Blogger. I'd like to suggest that Twitter consider
a) SURBL implementation guided by community inputs and tempered by anti-spam leaders
b) shortly thereafter ratify or endorse a SURBL compliant (stated) URL shortening service
Conclusion
Enforcing reputation and checks against SURBL removes a key vector being used by these namespace and follow approaches by the current run of spammers on Twitter.
10
people like this idea
I like this idea!
Tell me when this idea gets some attention.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who like this idea, the more it gets noticed.
-
Inappropriate?Not once did you define SURBL.
1 person thinks
this is one of the best points
-
Inappropriate?Yeah, I don't think my HTML inclusions made it. SURBL can be read about here http://surbl.org and here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SURBL and here is how URL shortening services use it http://www.surbl.org/redirect.html
-
Inappropriate?I have no idea what this means. I don't care what's done, as long as the spamming stops. Please don't e-mail me about technical programming voodoo that I don't understand.
I’m wishing I'd never participated on this survey site.
-
This isn't a survey site. And also, by posting in here, you automatically 'followed' this thread, you were not following it until you decided to follow this thread by posting in it. You just opted into being e-mailed by saying "please don't send me e-mail", do you realize this? -
Inappropriate?I'll stop following it. And I'll stop posting here. I really don't need any more spam than I already get.
I’m annoyed.
-
Inappropriate?Twitter's web interface is now showing this message:
"WARNING! If you get email notice about a DM with a link to blogspot.com it could be phishing."
http://status.twitter.com/post/681965...
I’m a bit concerned
-
Inappropriate?And oddly enough... some progress is being made in the hiring pool at Twitter :) Cool!
http://twitter.jobscore.com/jobs/twit...
I’m confident
-
Inappropriate?What happens if you are a non profit who works very hard and very long hours often times till 4 am trying to develop a relationship with others on Twitter. And you use bit.ly to shorten your link and suddenly you find out from someone that we have been put on the SURBL list and all your links warn people we are a scam. We help find cures for Cancer in dogs we don't spam, we don't send out mass emails but what does happen is because we list alot of good information to people we get RT'ed ALOT.
Too much power in organizations like SURBL is what causes problems. We do live in a country where we are innocent until proven guilty. But SURBL follows the rule you are guilty and must prove you are innocent.
They should first contact someone and give them the opportunity to explain what they are doing. Not put us on a list, cause harm to our credibility and then have us fill out forms to say we are innocent.
Loading Profile...







