I think there might be a mistake in the One Bulge Cross data.

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 9 years ago
  • Answered
  • 1
I noticed that round 2 only has 5 synthesized designs, while round 4 has 9 designs and round 5 has ten designs. Shouldn't they all have 8?
Photo of starryjess

starryjess

  • 35 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
  • curious

Posted 9 years ago

  • 1
9 years ago
Photo of Ding

Ding

  • 94 Posts
  • 20 Reply Likes
I think that was the lab when there was a delay in some of the processing, so some designs that were submitted in Round Two were synthesized in Round Three, leaving the lab swamped and requiring them to push some of the Round Three designs into Round Four synthesis, etc...

In the csv I think it has both the round they were submitted in and the round they were synthesized during.
9 years ago
Photo of Jeehyung Lee

Jeehyung Lee, Alum

  • 708 Posts
  • 94 Reply Likes
Ding's right - there was a mix up in rounds where only subset of synthesis results were delayed.

Thanks for responding Ding!
9 years ago
Photo of starryjess

starryjess

  • 35 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
In the csv the synthesis round column is identical to the submitted round column.
2011-04-10T03:32:00+00:00
Photo of Ding

Ding

  • 94 Posts
  • 20 Reply Likes
Guess I remembered wrong, sorry :(

You can always sort by NID number to figure out which designs were submitted in which round (first 8 are round one, second 8 round two, etc)
2011-04-10T03:54:07+00:00
Photo of Berex NZ

Berex NZ

  • 116 Posts
  • 20 Reply Likes
NID number isn't that accurate either. Its more accurate. But the submitted round column might need to be made more accurate. Especially with the somewhat frequent lab delays... Would help in revising earlier designs.
  • 1

Powered by Get Satisfaction