Loading Profile...
In order to preserve the promise of transparency and open communication, the change log records changes to topics made by both customers and employees. Anyone can dispute a change by clicking the "Dispute" link and entering additional details.
-
Sylvía Hilmarsdóttir, the poster:Removed a reply by Sylvía Hilmarsdóttir in Reserve your names before you get a permission, then release the names to you when a permission is received or 110 years have passed.Reason: removed by the poster
-
Sylvía Hilmarsdóttir, the poster:Removed a reply by Sylvía Hilmarsdóttir in Reserve your names before you get a permission, then release the names to you when a permission is received or 110 years have passed.Reason: removed by the poster
-
Stewart Millar, the poster:Removed a reply by Stewart Millar in Potentially the best printed report from Family Tree - that is not there (yet)Reason: removed by the poster
-
Sylvía Hilmarsdóttir, the poster:Removed a reply by Sylvía Hilmarsdóttir in Reserve your names before you get a permission, then release the names to you when a permission is received or 110 years have passed.Reason: removed by the poster
-
Ron TannerChanged reply in topic of Feature Enhancement Request: Ordinances Ready by Ron Tanner to The limits on Ordinances Ready are set by the Temple Department and may change larger or smaller over time..
-
Paul Wrightson, the poster:Removed May Be a Match hint by Paul WrightsonReason: removed by the poster
-
Tom Huber, the poster:Reason: removed by the poster
-
Stewart Millar, the poster:Removed a reply by Stewart Millar in Please add "Duplicate" next to "Not a Match" on the suggested sources that the computer finds for us.Reason: removed by the poster
-
Gail Ann Hellings, the poster:Removed a reply by Gail Ann Hellings in Please Restore little arrows to change order of Sources- users should be able to put them a Logical Order- NOT stuck with Random confusionReason: removed by the poster
-
Gail Ann Hellings, the poster:Removed a reply by Gail Ann Hellings in Please Restore little arrows to change order of Sources- users should be able to put them a Logical Order- NOT stuck with Random confusionReason: removed by the poster
-
Paul Wrightson, the poster:Reason: removed by the poster
-
Jenn Marie, the poster:Reason: removed by the poster
-
Carol Anne Lethaby, the poster:Reason: removed by the poster
-
joe martelChanged reply in topic of Deleting one's family tree from FamilySearch by joe martel to There are probably other approaches that maybe would be better. But there's always a trade-off: keep my tree intact vs. community contribution... In many ways FS FT follows the wikipedia model - any user can edit - open edit, and no one user owns the data. Other approaches include a curated model - where a user can post and another review, or another where a user suggest and another accepts/rejects that. To give some idea of scope and scale earlier this year:<br />- 4 millions persons are added each month<br />- 125 million transactions happen each hour<br />- about 1 million conclusion writes (add a birth, edit a relationship...) happen each day<br />An approval model would need to have users curate probably double that today.<br /><br />I'm always interested in new approaches that would slow bad data coming in and facilitate good changes..
-
joe martelChanged reply in topic of Deleting one's family tree from FamilySearch by joe martel to There are probably other approaches that maybe would be better. But there's always a trade-off: keep my tree intact vs. community contribution... In many ways FS FT follows the wikipedia model - any user can edit - open edit, and no one user owns the data. Other approaches include a curated model - where a user can post and another review, or another where a user suggest and another accepts/rejects that. To give some idea of scope and scale earlier this year:<br />- 4 millions persons are added each month<br />- 125 million transactions happen each hour<br />- about 1 million conclusion writes happen each day<br />An approval model would need to have users curate probably double that today.<br /><br />I'm always interested in new approaches that would slow bad data coming in and facilitate good changes..
-
joe martelChanged reply in topic of Deleting one's family tree from FamilySearch by joe martel to There are probably other approaches that maybe would be better. But there's always a trade-off: keep my tree intact vs. community contribution... In many ways FS FT follows the wikipedia model - any user can edit - open edit, and no one user owns the data. Other approaches include a curated model - where a user can post and another review, or another where a user suggest and another accepts/rejects that. To give some idea of scope and scale earlier this year:<br />- 4 millions persons are added each month<br />- 125 million transactions happen each hour.<br />An approval model would need to have users curate probably double that today.<br /><br />I'm always interested in new approaches that would slow bad data coming in and facilitate good changes..
-
Paul Wrightson, the poster:Removed a reply by Paul Wrightson in Please add "Duplicate" next to "Not a Match" on the suggested sources that the computer finds for us.Reason: removed by the poster
-
Siv Collett, the poster:Reason: removed by the poster
| next » « previous |