#190913-230943-088802 - this was declined arbitrarily

  • 1
  • Problem
  • Updated 1 month ago
  • Solved
  • (Edited)
I reported a duplicate image which is worse in quality comparing to another existing one. The better image taken from original BD is mentioned and linked in the explanation field. Why and how my report was declined for the reason "Does not meet contribution guidelines" that can further effect all the next contributions of images?
Photo of MAthePA

MAthePA

  • 2063 Posts
  • 3495 Reply Likes

Posted 1 month ago

  • 1
Photo of Will

Will, Official Rep

  • 3909 Posts
  • 4967 Reply Likes
Hi MAthePA,

The delete was submitted against the primary image of the name page, which is why it was rejected. I've now amended the primary and removed the duplicate image.

Thanks,
Will
Photo of MAthePA

MAthePA

  • 2063 Posts
  • 3495 Reply Likes
Hi, Will.
Thank you for the action.
I'd like to mention that the delete was submitted against one of many other images on the title page, not the name page -- it is obvious (see the submitted data).

Anyway, "Does not meet contribution guidelines" might not be the reason for such submission in any of both possible cases, because instead I suggested the same image but of much better quality. A cumulative "Does not meet contribution guidelines" is a very bad sign when contributing images. Those who want to punish me and other conscientious contributors this way, have no extra salary after this while the base receives less benefit.